GGUS vs. SCHG
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Growth Equity ETF (GGUS) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG).
GGUS and SCHG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GGUS is a passively managed fund by Goldman Sachs that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth 40 Act Daily Capped Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Nov 28, 2023. SCHG is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Total Return Index. It was launched on Dec 11, 2009. Both GGUS and SCHG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GGUS or SCHG.
Correlation
The correlation between GGUS and SCHG is 0.98, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
GGUS vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
GGUS:
1.76
SCHG:
1.73
GGUS:
2.34
SCHG:
2.30
GGUS:
1.31
SCHG:
1.31
GGUS:
2.47
SCHG:
2.52
GGUS:
9.45
SCHG:
9.50
GGUS:
3.04%
SCHG:
3.27%
GGUS:
16.36%
SCHG:
17.95%
GGUS:
-11.62%
SCHG:
-34.59%
GGUS:
-0.25%
SCHG:
-0.55%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GGUS achieves a 4.09% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 3.84% return.
GGUS
4.09%
3.22%
14.89%
27.57%
N/A
N/A
SCHG
3.84%
2.30%
14.84%
30.29%
18.58%
16.62%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GGUS vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
GGUS has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GGUS vs. SCHG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
GGUS
SCHG
GGUS vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Growth Equity ETF (GGUS) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GGUS vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
GGUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, more than SCHG's 0.38% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGUS Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Growth Equity ETF | 0.89% | 0.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.38% | 0.40% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% | 1.09% |
Drawdowns
GGUS vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GGUS drawdown since its inception was -11.62%, smaller than the maximum SCHG drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGUS and SCHG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GGUS vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Growth Equity ETF (GGUS) is 4.87%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a volatility of 5.24%. This indicates that GGUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.