PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GGUS vs. GDOC
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GGUS vs. GDOC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Growth Equity ETF (GGUS) and Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF (GDOC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GGUS vs. GDOC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
GGUS
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Growth Equity ETF
-8.81%17.32%30.88%4.54%
GDOC
Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF
-8.12%10.74%-1.66%8.47%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GGUS achieves a -8.81% return, which is significantly lower than GDOC's -8.12% return.


GGUS

1D
3.65%
1M
-5.28%
YTD
-8.81%
6M
-8.20%
1Y
17.99%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GDOC

1D
2.76%
1M
-5.94%
YTD
-8.12%
6M
2.88%
1Y
1.53%
3Y*
0.66%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GGUS vs. GDOC - Expense Ratio Comparison

GGUS has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than GDOC's 0.75% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

GGUS vs. GDOC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GGUS
GGUS Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
GGUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GGUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
GGUS Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
GGUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
GGUS Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

GDOC
GDOC Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
GDOC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDOC Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDOC Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
GDOC Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDOC Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GGUS vs. GDOC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Growth Equity ETF (GGUS) and Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF (GDOC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GGUSGDOCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.83

0.08

+0.75

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.33

0.25

+1.09

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.03

+0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.21

0.10

+1.11

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.22

0.31

+3.91

GGUS vs. GDOC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GGUS Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is higher than the GDOC Sharpe Ratio of 0.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GGUS and GDOC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GGUSGDOCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

0.08

+0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.93

-0.20

+1.13

Correlation

The correlation between GGUS and GDOC is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

GGUS vs. GDOC - Dividend Comparison

GGUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%, more than GDOC's 0.35% yield.


TTM2025202420232022
GGUS
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Growth Equity ETF
0.48%0.43%0.68%0.00%0.00%
GDOC
Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF
0.35%0.32%0.02%0.55%0.00%

Drawdowns

GGUS vs. GDOC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GGUS drawdown since its inception was -22.59%, smaller than the maximum GDOC drawdown of -31.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGUS and GDOC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GGUSGDOCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.59%

-31.01%

+8.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.91%

-14.57%

-0.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.80%

-15.86%

+4.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.22%

-15.90%

+12.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.30%

4.96%

-0.66%

Volatility

GGUS vs. GDOC - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Growth Equity ETF (GGUS) has a higher volatility of 6.60% compared to Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF (GDOC) at 6.04%. This indicates that GGUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GDOC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GGUSGDOCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.60%

6.04%

+0.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.07%

11.22%

+0.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.80%

18.63%

+3.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.29%

18.83%

+0.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.29%

18.83%

+0.46%