FVD vs. CIBR

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FVD (First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund) and CIBR (First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FVD is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Value Line Dividend Index, while CIBR is a Cybersecurity fund tracking the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FVD returned 8.66%/yr vs 17.93%/yr for CIBR. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FVD charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for CIBR.

Performance

FVD vs. CIBR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund (FVD) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FVD achieves a 4.43% return, which is significantly lower than CIBR's 18.06% return. Over the past 10 years, FVD has underperformed CIBR with an annualized return of 8.66%, while CIBR has yielded a comparatively higher 17.93% annualized return.

FVD

• 1D: 1.10%
• 1M: -0.08%
• YTD: 4.43%
• 6M: 4.03%
• 1Y: 9.78%
• 3Y*: 9.12%
• 5Y*: 6.11%
• 10Y*: 8.66%

CIBR

• 1D: 0.75%
• 1M: -0.08%
• YTD: 18.06%
• 6M: 15.86%
• 1Y: 15.20%
• 3Y*: 24.74%
• 5Y*: 12.80%
• 10Y*: 17.93%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FVD vs. CIBR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FVD First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund	4.43%	8.16%	10.04%	4.11%	-5.18%	25.08%	-0.02%	26.58%	-3.49%	12.51%
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF	18.06%	13.06%	18.21%	39.71%	-26.46%	19.67%	50.53%	28.52%	1.47%	18.61%

Correlation

The correlation between FVD and CIBR is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.08
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.30
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.42
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2015	0.47

Over the past year, the correlation between FVD and CIBR has dropped to 0.08 - well below their long-term average of 0.47, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FVD vs. CIBR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FVD	CIBR
Financial Services	19.0%	-
Utilities	17.4%	-
Industrials	14.3%	2.7%
Consumer Defensive	11.1%	-
Healthcare	8.2%	-
Real Estate	7.7%	-
Technology	7.3%	95.4%
Consumer Cyclical	5.7%	-
Energy	3.6%	-
Communication Services	2.9%	1.9%
Basic Materials	2.9%	-

Return for Risk

FVD vs. CIBR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FVD

FVD Risk / Return Rank: 28
FVD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
FVD Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
FVD Omega Ratio Rank: 26
FVD Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
FVD Martin Ratio Rank: 27

CIBR

CIBR Risk / Return Rank: 18
CIBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
CIBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
CIBR Omega Ratio Rank: 19
CIBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
CIBR Martin Ratio Rank: 16

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FVD vs. CIBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund (FVD) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FVD	CIBR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.01	0.61	+0.41
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.53	0.99	+0.53
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.12	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.36	0.69	+0.66
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.48	1.60	+1.88

FVD vs. CIBR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FVD Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is higher than the CIBR Sharpe Ratio of 0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FVD and CIBR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FVD vs. CIBR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FVD drawdown since its inception was -51.00%, which is greater than CIBR's maximum drawdown of -33.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FVD and CIBR.

Drawdown Indicators

	FVD	CIBR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.00%	-33.89%	-17.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.23%	-21.99%	+14.76%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.97%	-21.99%	+10.02%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.41%	-33.89%	+17.48%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.25%	-33.89%	-1.36%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.91%	-10.72%	+6.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.44%	-8.66%	+3.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.81%	9.51%	-6.70%

Volatility

FVD vs. CIBR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund (FVD) is 3.28%, while First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) has a volatility of 12.03%. This indicates that FVD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FVD	CIBR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.28%	12.03%	-8.75%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.13%	21.54%	-14.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.77%	25.21%	-15.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.77%	25.07%	-12.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.44%	23.60%	-8.16%

FVD vs. CIBR - Expense Ratio Comparison

FVD has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than CIBR's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

FVD vs. CIBR - Dividend Comparison

FVD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.26%, more than CIBR's 0.49% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF	0.49%	0.42%	0.29%	0.42%	0.31%	0.59%	1.10%	0.23%	0.23%	0.10%	0.77%	0.58%
FVD First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund	2.26%	2.36%	2.23%	2.34%	2.20%	1.75%	2.31%	2.03%	2.50%	2.10%	2.04%	2.34%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FVD and CIBR in my portfolio?

FVD and CIBR have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FVD or CIBR?

CIBR has higher volatility (12.03%) compared to FVD (3.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FVD dropped -51.00% vs CIBR's -33.89%.

Which ETF is better, FVD or CIBR?

On 10-year performance, CIBR leads with 17.93% vs 8.66% for FVD. On fees, CIBR is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, FVD has been the lower-risk option at 3.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FVD or CIBR?

Over the 10-year period, CIBR has performed better with a 17.93% return vs 8.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FVD or CIBR?

CIBR is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for FVD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FVD or CIBR?

FVD has the higher dividend yield at 2.26%, compared with 0.49% for CIBR.

What is the main difference between FVD and CIBR?

FVD is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while CIBR is Cybersecurity. FVD tracks Value Line Dividend Index, while CIBR tracks Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for FVD and 0.60% for CIBR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FVD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.01 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.