CIBR vs. CRWD
CIBR (First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF) is Cybersecurity fund tracking the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index, while CRWD (CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, CIBR returned 14.99%/yr vs 26.53%/yr for CRWD. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
CIBR vs. CRWD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CIBR achieves a 21.55% return, which is significantly lower than CRWD's 43.15% return.
CIBR
- 1D
- -4.41%
- 1M
- 18.54%
- YTD
- 21.55%
- 6M
- 16.15%
- 1Y
- 18.67%
- 3Y*
- 25.83%
- 5Y*
- 14.99%
- 10Y*
- 17.73%
CRWD
- 1D
- -6.68%
- 1M
- 32.69%
- YTD
- 43.15%
- 6M
- 31.05%
- 1Y
- 43.25%
- 3Y*
- 63.67%
- 5Y*
- 26.53%
- 10Y*
- —
CIBR vs. CRWD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF | 21.55% | 13.06% | 18.21% | 39.71% | -26.46% | 19.67% | 50.53% | 6.85% |
CRWD CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. | 43.15% | 37.00% | 34.01% | 142.49% | -48.58% | -3.34% | 324.74% | -14.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between CIBR and CRWD is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2019 | 0.76 |
The correlation between CIBR and CRWD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CIBR vs. CRWD — Risk / Return Rank
CIBR
CRWD
CIBR vs. CRWD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) and CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CIBR | CRWD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.20 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.87 | 1.21 | -0.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.05 | 2.79 | -0.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CIBR | CRWD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 | 1.01 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 | 0.52 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.75 | -0.11 |
Drawdowns
CIBR vs. CRWD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CIBR drawdown since its inception was -33.89%, smaller than the maximum CRWD drawdown of -67.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIBR and CRWD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CIBR | CRWD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.89% | -67.69% | +33.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.99% | -37.18% | +15.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.99% | -44.44% | +22.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.89% | -67.69% | +33.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.89% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.08% | -14.21% | +6.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.66% | -23.65% | +14.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.27% | 16.15% | -6.88% |
Volatility
CIBR vs. CRWD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) is 12.36%, while CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD) has a volatility of 18.42%. This indicates that CIBR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRWD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CIBR | CRWD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.36% | 18.42% | -6.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.41% | 37.04% | -15.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.91% | 44.93% | -20.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.02% | 50.79% | -25.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.64% | 56.00% | -32.36% |
Dividends
CIBR vs. CRWD - Dividend Comparison
CIBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%, while CRWD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF | 0.47% | 0.42% | 0.29% | 0.42% | 0.31% | 0.59% | 1.10% | 0.23% | 0.23% | 0.10% | 0.77% | 0.58% |
CRWD CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CIBR and CRWD have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CRWD has higher volatility (18.42%) compared to CIBR (12.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CIBR dropped -33.89% vs CRWD's -67.69%.
CRWD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.01 vs 0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CIBR and CRWD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer