FVD vs. SCHD
FVD (First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund) and SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FVD is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Value Line Dividend Index, while SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FVD returned 8.54%/yr vs 12.68%/yr for SCHD. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FVD charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHD.
Performance
FVD vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FVD achieves a 3.30% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 17.24% return. Over the past 10 years, FVD has underperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 8.54%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively higher 12.68% annualized return.
FVD
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- -1.17%
- YTD
- 3.30%
- 6M
- 2.96%
- 1Y
- 9.84%
- 3Y*
- 8.73%
- 5Y*
- 5.99%
- 10Y*
- 8.54%
SCHD
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -2.86%
- YTD
- 17.24%
- 6M
- 16.44%
- 1Y
- 24.06%
- 3Y*
- 14.45%
- 5Y*
- 8.77%
- 10Y*
- 12.68%
FVD vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FVD First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund | 3.30% | 8.16% | 10.04% | 4.11% | -5.18% | 25.08% | -0.02% | 26.58% | -3.49% | 12.51% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 17.24% | 4.34% | 11.66% | 4.54% | -3.26% | 29.87% | 15.03% | 27.29% | -5.56% | 20.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between FVD and SCHD is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2011 | 0.90 |
The correlation between FVD and SCHD shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (1 year) to 0.90 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FVD vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FVD
SCHD
Financial Services
Utilities
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Real Estate
-
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Financial Services
FVD
SCHD
Utilities
FVD
SCHD
Industrials
FVD
SCHD
Consumer Defensive
FVD
SCHD
Healthcare
FVD
SCHD
Real Estate
FVD
SCHD
-
Technology
FVD
SCHD
Consumer Cyclical
FVD
SCHD
Energy
FVD
SCHD
Communication Services
FVD
SCHD
Basic Materials
FVD
SCHD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FVD vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
FVD
SCHD
FVD vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund (FVD) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FVD | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.39 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.37 | 5.24 | -3.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.52 | 12.71 | -9.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FVD vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FVD drawdown since its inception was -51.00%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FVD and SCHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FVD | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.00% | -33.37% | -17.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.23% | -4.61% | -2.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.97% | -16.13% | +4.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.41% | -16.85% | +0.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.25% | -33.37% | -1.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.95% | -2.86% | -2.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.44% | -3.31% | -2.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.80% | 1.90% | +0.90% |
Volatility
FVD vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund (FVD) is 3.12%, while Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) has a volatility of 3.58%. This indicates that FVD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FVD | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.12% | 3.58% | -0.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.05% | 7.74% | -0.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.73% | 11.09% | -1.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.76% | 14.36% | -1.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.46% | 16.73% | -1.27% |
FVD vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
FVD has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
FVD vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
FVD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.29%, less than SCHD's 3.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FVD First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund | 2.29% | 2.36% | 2.23% | 2.34% | 2.20% | 1.75% | 2.31% | 2.03% | 2.50% | 2.10% | 2.04% | 2.34% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.31% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FVD and SCHD have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHD has higher volatility (3.58%) compared to FVD (3.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FVD dropped -51.00% vs SCHD's -33.37%.
On 10-year performance, SCHD leads with 12.68% vs 8.54% for FVD. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, FVD has been the lower-risk option at 3.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 12.68% return vs 8.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for FVD.
SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.31%, compared with 2.29% for FVD.
FVD is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while SCHD is Dividend. FVD tracks Value Line Dividend Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for FVD and 0.06% for SCHD.
SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FVD and SCHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer