FVD vs. HERD
FVD (First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund) and HERD (Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FVD is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Value Line Dividend Index, while HERD is a Global Equities fund tracking the Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FVD returned 5.99%/yr vs 9.42%/yr for HERD. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FVD charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.73%/yr for HERD.
Performance
FVD vs. HERD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FVD achieves a 3.30% return, which is significantly lower than HERD's 7.61% return.
FVD
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- -1.17%
- YTD
- 3.30%
- 6M
- 2.96%
- 1Y
- 9.84%
- 3Y*
- 8.73%
- 5Y*
- 5.99%
- 10Y*
- 8.54%
HERD
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- -2.59%
- YTD
- 7.61%
- 6M
- 6.96%
- 1Y
- 23.68%
- 3Y*
- 15.54%
- 5Y*
- 9.42%
- 10Y*
- —
FVD vs. HERD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FVD First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund | 3.30% | 8.16% | 10.04% | 4.11% | -5.18% | 25.08% | -0.02% | 9.91% |
HERD Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF | 7.61% | 19.07% | 2.91% | 20.72% | -6.96% | 28.58% | 10.71% | 6.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between FVD and HERD is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2019 | 0.60 |
The correlation between FVD and HERD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.
FVD vs. HERD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FVD
HERD
Financial Services
Utilities
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Real Estate
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Financial Services
FVD
HERD
Utilities
FVD
HERD
Industrials
FVD
HERD
Consumer Defensive
FVD
HERD
Healthcare
FVD
HERD
Real Estate
FVD
HERD
Technology
FVD
HERD
Consumer Cyclical
FVD
HERD
Energy
FVD
HERD
Communication Services
FVD
HERD
Basic Materials
FVD
HERD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FVD vs. HERD — Risk / Return Rank
FVD
HERD
FVD vs. HERD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund (FVD) and Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF (HERD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FVD | HERD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.36 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.37 | 4.19 | -2.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.52 | 13.55 | -10.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FVD vs. HERD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FVD drawdown since its inception was -51.00%, which is greater than HERD's maximum drawdown of -39.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FVD and HERD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FVD | HERD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.00% | -39.41% | -11.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.23% | -5.68% | -1.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.97% | -18.90% | +6.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.41% | -21.60% | +5.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.25% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.95% | -4.60% | -0.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.44% | -4.54% | -0.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.80% | 1.75% | +1.05% |
Volatility
FVD vs. HERD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund (FVD) is 3.12%, while Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF (HERD) has a volatility of 3.86%. This indicates that FVD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HERD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FVD | HERD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.12% | 3.86% | -0.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.05% | 8.26% | -1.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.73% | 11.96% | -2.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.76% | 17.75% | -4.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.46% | 20.47% | -5.01% |
FVD vs. HERD - Expense Ratio Comparison
FVD has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is lower than HERD's 0.73% expense ratio.
Dividends
FVD vs. HERD - Dividend Comparison
FVD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.29%, less than HERD's 2.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FVD First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund | 2.29% | 2.36% | 2.23% | 2.34% | 2.20% | 1.75% | 2.31% | 2.03% | 2.50% | 2.10% | 2.04% | 2.34% |
HERD Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF | 2.91% | 3.75% | 2.43% | 2.54% | 2.50% | 2.02% | 1.95% | 1.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FVD and HERD have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HERD has higher volatility (3.86%) compared to FVD (3.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FVD dropped -51.00% vs HERD's -39.41%.
On 5-year performance, HERD leads with 9.42% vs 5.99% for FVD. On fees, FVD is cheaper at 0.61% per year. On volatility, FVD has been the lower-risk option at 3.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, HERD has performed better with a 9.42% return vs 5.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FVD is cheaper with a 0.61% expense ratio, compared with 0.73% for HERD.
HERD has the higher dividend yield at 2.91%, compared with 2.29% for FVD.
FVD is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while HERD is Global Equities. FVD tracks Value Line Dividend Index, while HERD tracks Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for FVD and 0.73% for HERD.
HERD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FVD and HERD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer