PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FVD vs. VYM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FVD vs. VYM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund (FVD) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FVD achieves a 10.07% return, which is significantly lower than VYM's 14.21% return. Over the past 10 years, FVD has underperformed VYM with an annualized return of 8.75%, while VYM has yielded a comparatively higher 11.71% annualized return.


FVD

1D
-0.18%
1M
1.52%
6M
5.94%
YTD
10.07%
1Y
14.68%
3Y*
9.72%
5Y*
6.75%
10Y*
8.75%
ALL TIME*
9.74%

VYM

1D
0.00%
1M
1.56%
6M
9.31%
YTD
14.21%
1Y
24.90%
3Y*
16.96%
5Y*
12.20%
10Y*
11.71%
ALL TIME*
9.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$21.15M$21.63M$33.04M
$195.34M$198.02M$200.78M

FVD vs. VYM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FVD
First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund
10.07%8.16%10.04%4.11%-5.18%25.08%-0.02%26.58%-3.49%12.51%
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
14.21%15.42%17.60%6.57%-0.43%26.20%1.15%24.06%-5.92%16.42%

Correlation

The correlation between FVD and VYM is 0.68, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2006

0.91

Over the past year, the correlation between FVD and VYM has dropped to 0.68 - well below their long-term average of 0.91, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FVD vs. VYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FVD
VYM

Financial Services

19.8%
21.0%

Utilities

17.3%
5.7%

Industrials

14.4%
12.6%

Consumer Defensive

10.9%
8.1%

Healthcare

8.2%
13.2%

Real Estate

8.1%
0.0%

Technology

6.7%
17.8%

Consumer Cyclical

5.3%
6.8%

Energy

3.5%
8.6%

Communication Services

3.1%
3.0%

Basic Materials

2.8%
3.3%

Financial Services

FVD
19.8%
VYM
21.0%

Utilities

FVD
17.3%
VYM
5.7%

Industrials

FVD
14.4%
VYM
12.6%

Consumer Defensive

FVD
10.9%
VYM
8.1%

Healthcare

FVD
8.2%
VYM
13.2%

Real Estate

FVD
8.1%
VYM
0.0%

Technology

FVD
6.7%
VYM
17.8%

Consumer Cyclical

FVD
5.3%
VYM
6.8%

Energy

FVD
3.5%
VYM
8.6%

Communication Services

FVD
3.1%
VYM
3.0%

Basic Materials

FVD
2.8%
VYM
3.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FVD vs. VYM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FVD
FVD Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
FVD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FVD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
FVD Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
FVD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
FVD Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

VYM
VYM Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
VYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
VYM Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
VYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
VYM Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FVD vs. VYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund (FVD) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FVDVYMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.43

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.99

3.56

-1.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.07

13.40

-8.33

FVD vs. VYM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FVD Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is lower than the VYM Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FVD and VYM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FVD vs. VYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FVD drawdown since its inception was -51.00%, smaller than the maximum VYM drawdown of -56.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FVD and VYM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FVDVYMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.00%

-56.98%

+5.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.23%

-6.69%

-0.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.97%

-14.46%

+2.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.41%

-15.84%

-0.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.25%

-35.21%

-0.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.72%

-1.15%

-0.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.42%

-7.14%

+1.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.83%

1.78%

+1.05%

Volatility

FVD vs. VYM - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund (FVD) has a higher volatility of 4.37% compared to Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) at 2.46%. This indicates that FVD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FVDVYMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.37%

2.46%

+1.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.01%

7.42%

+0.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.14%

10.29%

-0.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.84%

13.87%

-1.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.47%

16.29%

-0.82%

FVD vs. VYM - Expense Ratio Comparison

FVD has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than VYM's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

FVD vs. VYM - Dividend Comparison

FVD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.23%, which matches VYM's 2.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FVD
First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund
2.23%2.36%2.23%2.34%2.20%1.75%2.31%2.03%2.50%2.10%2.04%2.34%
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
2.24%2.44%2.74%3.12%3.01%2.76%3.18%3.03%3.40%2.80%2.91%3.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


FVD and VYM have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FVD has higher volatility (4.37%) compared to VYM (2.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FVD dropped -51.00% vs VYM's -56.98%.

On 10-year performance, VYM leads with 11.71% vs 8.75% for FVD. On fees, VYM is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VYM has been the lower-risk option at 2.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VYM has performed better with a 11.71% return vs 8.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VYM is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for FVD.

FVD and VYM have nearly identical dividend yields, around 2.23%.

FVD is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while VYM is Dividend. FVD tracks Value Line Dividend Index, while VYM tracks FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for FVD and 0.04% for VYM.

VYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FVD and VYM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer