PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CIBR vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CIBR vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CIBR achieves a 21.55% return, which is significantly higher than QQQ's 14.92% return. Over the past 10 years, CIBR has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 17.73%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 21.27% annualized return.


CIBR

1D
-4.41%
1M
18.54%
YTD
21.55%
6M
16.15%
1Y
18.67%
3Y*
25.83%
5Y*
14.99%
10Y*
17.73%

QQQ

1D
-4.80%
1M
1.46%
YTD
14.92%
6M
13.01%
1Y
33.69%
3Y*
26.46%
5Y*
16.70%
10Y*
21.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CIBR vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CIBR
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF
21.55%13.06%18.21%39.71%-26.46%19.67%50.53%28.52%1.47%18.61%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
14.92%20.77%25.58%54.86%-32.58%27.42%48.62%38.96%-0.13%32.66%

Correlation

The correlation between CIBR and QQQ is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2015

0.77

The correlation between CIBR and QQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.77 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CIBR vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CIBR
QQQ

Technology

94.0%
53.8%

Industrials

3.5%
2.8%

Communication Services

2.6%
15.8%

Basic Materials

-

1.1%

Consumer Cyclical

-

12.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

7.7%

Energy

-

0.6%

Financial Services

-

0.2%

Healthcare

-

4.2%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Utilities

-

1.4%

Technology

CIBR
94.0%
QQQ
53.8%

Industrials

CIBR
3.5%
QQQ
2.8%

Communication Services

CIBR
2.6%
QQQ
15.8%

Basic Materials

CIBR

-

QQQ
1.1%

Consumer Cyclical

CIBR

-

QQQ
12.3%

Consumer Defensive

CIBR

-

QQQ
7.7%

Energy

CIBR

-

QQQ
0.6%

Financial Services

CIBR

-

QQQ
0.2%

Healthcare

CIBR

-

QQQ
4.2%

Real Estate

CIBR

-

QQQ
0.1%

Utilities

CIBR

-

QQQ
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CIBR vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CIBR
CIBR Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
CIBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIBR Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
CIBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIBR Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CIBR vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CIBRQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.37

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.87

2.94

-2.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.05

11.22

-9.17

CIBR vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CIBR Sharpe Ratio is 0.77, which is lower than the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CIBR and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CIBRQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

2.11

-1.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.75

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

0.95

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.40

+0.24

Drawdowns

CIBR vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIBR drawdown since its inception was -33.89%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIBR and QQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CIBRQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.89%

-82.97%

+49.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.99%

-11.96%

-10.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.99%

-22.77%

+0.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.89%

-35.12%

+1.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.89%

-35.12%

+1.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.08%

-5.51%

-2.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.66%

-32.78%

+24.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.27%

3.13%

+6.14%

Volatility

CIBR vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) has a higher volatility of 12.36% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 6.68%. This indicates that CIBR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CIBRQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.36%

6.68%

+5.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.41%

13.12%

+8.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.91%

16.69%

+8.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.02%

22.47%

+2.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.64%

22.34%

+1.30%

CIBR vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

CIBR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

CIBR vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

CIBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%, more than QQQ's 0.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CIBR
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF
0.47%0.42%0.29%0.42%0.31%0.59%1.10%0.23%0.23%0.10%0.77%0.58%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.40%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


CIBR and QQQ have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CIBR has higher volatility (12.36%) compared to QQQ (6.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CIBR dropped -33.89% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

On 10-year performance, QQQ leads with 21.27% vs 17.73% for CIBR. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, QQQ has been the lower-risk option at 6.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 21.27% return vs 17.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for CIBR.

CIBR has the higher dividend yield at 0.47%, compared with 0.40% for QQQ.

CIBR is categorized as Cybersecurity, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. CIBR tracks Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for CIBR and 0.18% for QQQ.

QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CIBR and QQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer