CIBR vs. QQQ
CIBR (First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CIBR is a Cybersecurity fund tracking the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index, while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CIBR returned 17.73%/yr vs 21.27%/yr for QQQ. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CIBR charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.
Performance
CIBR vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CIBR achieves a 21.55% return, which is significantly higher than QQQ's 14.92% return. Over the past 10 years, CIBR has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 17.73%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 21.27% annualized return.
CIBR
- 1D
- -4.41%
- 1M
- 18.54%
- YTD
- 21.55%
- 6M
- 16.15%
- 1Y
- 18.67%
- 3Y*
- 25.83%
- 5Y*
- 14.99%
- 10Y*
- 17.73%
QQQ
- 1D
- -4.80%
- 1M
- 1.46%
- YTD
- 14.92%
- 6M
- 13.01%
- 1Y
- 33.69%
- 3Y*
- 26.46%
- 5Y*
- 16.70%
- 10Y*
- 21.27%
CIBR vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF | 21.55% | 13.06% | 18.21% | 39.71% | -26.46% | 19.67% | 50.53% | 28.52% | 1.47% | 18.61% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 14.92% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 48.62% | 38.96% | -0.13% | 32.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between CIBR and QQQ is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2015 | 0.77 |
The correlation between CIBR and QQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.77 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
CIBR vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CIBR
QQQ
Technology
Industrials
Communication Services
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
CIBR
QQQ
Industrials
CIBR
QQQ
Communication Services
CIBR
QQQ
Basic Materials
CIBR
-
QQQ
Consumer Cyclical
CIBR
-
QQQ
Consumer Defensive
CIBR
-
QQQ
Energy
CIBR
-
QQQ
Financial Services
CIBR
-
QQQ
Healthcare
CIBR
-
QQQ
Real Estate
CIBR
-
QQQ
Utilities
CIBR
-
QQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CIBR vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
CIBR
QQQ
CIBR vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CIBR | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.37 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.87 | 2.94 | -2.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.05 | 11.22 | -9.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CIBR | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 | 2.11 | -1.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 | 0.75 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 | 0.95 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.40 | +0.24 |
Drawdowns
CIBR vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CIBR drawdown since its inception was -33.89%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIBR and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CIBR | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.89% | -82.97% | +49.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.99% | -11.96% | -10.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.99% | -22.77% | +0.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.89% | -35.12% | +1.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.89% | -35.12% | +1.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.08% | -5.51% | -2.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.66% | -32.78% | +24.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.27% | 3.13% | +6.14% |
Volatility
CIBR vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) has a higher volatility of 12.36% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 6.68%. This indicates that CIBR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CIBR | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.36% | 6.68% | +5.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.41% | 13.12% | +8.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.91% | 16.69% | +8.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.02% | 22.47% | +2.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.64% | 22.34% | +1.30% |
CIBR vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
CIBR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
CIBR vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
CIBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%, more than QQQ's 0.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF | 0.47% | 0.42% | 0.29% | 0.42% | 0.31% | 0.59% | 1.10% | 0.23% | 0.23% | 0.10% | 0.77% | 0.58% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.40% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CIBR and QQQ have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CIBR has higher volatility (12.36%) compared to QQQ (6.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CIBR dropped -33.89% vs QQQ's -82.97%.
On 10-year performance, QQQ leads with 21.27% vs 17.73% for CIBR. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, QQQ has been the lower-risk option at 6.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 21.27% return vs 17.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for CIBR.
CIBR has the higher dividend yield at 0.47%, compared with 0.40% for QQQ.
CIBR is categorized as Cybersecurity, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. CIBR tracks Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for CIBR and 0.18% for QQQ.
QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CIBR and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer