PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CIBR vs. IHAK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CIBR vs. IHAK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) and iShares Cybersecurity & Tech ETF (IHAK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CIBR achieves a 21.55% return, which is significantly higher than IHAK's 18.52% return.


CIBR

1D
-4.41%
1M
23.56%
YTD
21.55%
6M
16.15%
1Y
18.97%
3Y*
25.83%
5Y*
14.99%
10Y*
17.73%

IHAK

1D
-3.62%
1M
15.04%
YTD
18.52%
6M
15.74%
1Y
10.66%
3Y*
15.74%
5Y*
7.00%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CIBR vs. IHAK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
CIBR
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF
21.55%13.06%18.21%39.71%-26.46%19.67%50.53%6.40%
IHAK
iShares Cybersecurity & Tech ETF
18.52%-1.29%7.60%37.77%-25.81%11.13%51.22%6.66%

Correlation

The correlation between CIBR and IHAK is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2019

0.95

The correlation between CIBR and IHAK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

CIBR vs. IHAK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CIBR
IHAK

Technology

94.0%
95.8%

Industrials

3.5%
3.3%

Communication Services

2.6%
0.4%

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

CIBR
94.0%
IHAK
95.8%

Industrials

CIBR
3.5%
IHAK
3.3%

Communication Services

CIBR
2.6%
IHAK
0.4%

Basic Materials

CIBR

-

IHAK

-

Consumer Cyclical

CIBR

-

IHAK

-

Consumer Defensive

CIBR

-

IHAK

-

Energy

CIBR

-

IHAK

-

Financial Services

CIBR

-

IHAK

-

Healthcare

CIBR

-

IHAK

-

Real Estate

CIBR

-

IHAK

-

Utilities

CIBR

-

IHAK

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CIBR vs. IHAK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CIBR
CIBR Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
CIBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIBR Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
CIBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIBR Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

IHAK
IHAK Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
IHAK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IHAK Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
IHAK Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
IHAK Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
IHAK Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CIBR vs. IHAK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) and iShares Cybersecurity & Tech ETF (IHAK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CIBRIHAKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.10

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.87

0.46

+0.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.05

1.07

+0.98

CIBR vs. IHAK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CIBR Sharpe Ratio is 0.77, which is higher than the IHAK Sharpe Ratio of 0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CIBR and IHAK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CIBRIHAKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

0.44

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.30

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.52

+0.12

Drawdowns

CIBR vs. IHAK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIBR drawdown since its inception was -33.89%, roughly equal to the maximum IHAK drawdown of -34.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIBR and IHAK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CIBRIHAKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.89%

-34.42%

+0.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.99%

-23.48%

+1.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.99%

-23.48%

+1.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.89%

-34.42%

+0.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.08%

-6.54%

-1.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.66%

-10.76%

+2.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.27%

9.99%

-0.72%

Volatility

CIBR vs. IHAK - Volatility Comparison

First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) has a higher volatility of 12.36% compared to iShares Cybersecurity & Tech ETF (IHAK) at 10.44%. This indicates that CIBR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IHAK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CIBRIHAKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.36%

10.44%

+1.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.41%

20.28%

+1.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.91%

24.31%

+0.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.02%

23.62%

+1.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.64%

24.44%

-0.80%

CIBR vs. IHAK - Expense Ratio Comparison

CIBR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than IHAK's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

CIBR vs. IHAK - Dividend Comparison

CIBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%, more than IHAK's 0.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CIBR
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF
0.47%0.42%0.29%0.42%0.31%0.59%1.10%0.23%0.23%0.10%0.77%0.58%
IHAK
iShares Cybersecurity & Tech ETF
0.07%0.08%0.20%0.13%0.25%0.50%0.40%0.50%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CIBR and IHAK have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CIBR has higher volatility (12.36%) compared to IHAK (10.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CIBR dropped -33.89% vs IHAK's -34.42%.

On 5-year performance, CIBR leads with 14.99% vs 7.00% for IHAK. On fees, IHAK is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, IHAK has been the lower-risk option at 10.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, CIBR has performed better with a 14.99% return vs 7.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IHAK is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for CIBR.

CIBR has the higher dividend yield at 0.47%, compared with 0.07% for IHAK.

CIBR is categorized as Cybersecurity, while IHAK is Technology Equities. CIBR tracks Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index, while IHAK tracks NYSE FactSet Global Cyber Security Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for CIBR and 0.47% for IHAK.

CIBR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.77 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CIBR and IHAK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer