CIBR vs. IHAK
CIBR (First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF) and IHAK (iShares Cybersecurity & Tech ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CIBR is a Cybersecurity fund tracking the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index, while IHAK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the NYSE FactSet Global Cyber Security Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CIBR returned 14.99%/yr vs 7.00%/yr for IHAK. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CIBR charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for IHAK.
Performance
CIBR vs. IHAK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CIBR achieves a 21.55% return, which is significantly higher than IHAK's 18.52% return.
CIBR
- 1D
- -4.41%
- 1M
- 23.56%
- YTD
- 21.55%
- 6M
- 16.15%
- 1Y
- 18.97%
- 3Y*
- 25.83%
- 5Y*
- 14.99%
- 10Y*
- 17.73%
IHAK
- 1D
- -3.62%
- 1M
- 15.04%
- YTD
- 18.52%
- 6M
- 15.74%
- 1Y
- 10.66%
- 3Y*
- 15.74%
- 5Y*
- 7.00%
- 10Y*
- —
CIBR vs. IHAK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF | 21.55% | 13.06% | 18.21% | 39.71% | -26.46% | 19.67% | 50.53% | 6.40% |
IHAK iShares Cybersecurity & Tech ETF | 18.52% | -1.29% | 7.60% | 37.77% | -25.81% | 11.13% | 51.22% | 6.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between CIBR and IHAK is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2019 | 0.95 |
The correlation between CIBR and IHAK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
CIBR vs. IHAK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CIBR
IHAK
Technology
Industrials
Communication Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
CIBR
IHAK
Industrials
CIBR
IHAK
Communication Services
CIBR
IHAK
Basic Materials
CIBR
-
IHAK
-
Consumer Cyclical
CIBR
-
IHAK
-
Consumer Defensive
CIBR
-
IHAK
-
Energy
CIBR
-
IHAK
-
Financial Services
CIBR
-
IHAK
-
Healthcare
CIBR
-
IHAK
-
Real Estate
CIBR
-
IHAK
-
Utilities
CIBR
-
IHAK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CIBR vs. IHAK — Risk / Return Rank
CIBR
IHAK
CIBR vs. IHAK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) and iShares Cybersecurity & Tech ETF (IHAK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CIBR | IHAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.10 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.87 | 0.46 | +0.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.05 | 1.07 | +0.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CIBR | IHAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 | 0.44 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 | 0.30 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.52 | +0.12 |
Drawdowns
CIBR vs. IHAK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CIBR drawdown since its inception was -33.89%, roughly equal to the maximum IHAK drawdown of -34.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIBR and IHAK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CIBR | IHAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.89% | -34.42% | +0.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.99% | -23.48% | +1.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.99% | -23.48% | +1.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.89% | -34.42% | +0.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.89% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.08% | -6.54% | -1.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.66% | -10.76% | +2.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.27% | 9.99% | -0.72% |
Volatility
CIBR vs. IHAK - Volatility Comparison
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) has a higher volatility of 12.36% compared to iShares Cybersecurity & Tech ETF (IHAK) at 10.44%. This indicates that CIBR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IHAK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CIBR | IHAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.36% | 10.44% | +1.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.41% | 20.28% | +1.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.91% | 24.31% | +0.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.02% | 23.62% | +1.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.64% | 24.44% | -0.80% |
CIBR vs. IHAK - Expense Ratio Comparison
CIBR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than IHAK's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
CIBR vs. IHAK - Dividend Comparison
CIBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%, more than IHAK's 0.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF | 0.47% | 0.42% | 0.29% | 0.42% | 0.31% | 0.59% | 1.10% | 0.23% | 0.23% | 0.10% | 0.77% | 0.58% |
IHAK iShares Cybersecurity & Tech ETF | 0.07% | 0.08% | 0.20% | 0.13% | 0.25% | 0.50% | 0.40% | 0.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CIBR and IHAK have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CIBR has higher volatility (12.36%) compared to IHAK (10.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CIBR dropped -33.89% vs IHAK's -34.42%.
On 5-year performance, CIBR leads with 14.99% vs 7.00% for IHAK. On fees, IHAK is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, IHAK has been the lower-risk option at 10.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, CIBR has performed better with a 14.99% return vs 7.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IHAK is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for CIBR.
CIBR has the higher dividend yield at 0.47%, compared with 0.07% for IHAK.
CIBR is categorized as Cybersecurity, while IHAK is Technology Equities. CIBR tracks Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index, while IHAK tracks NYSE FactSet Global Cyber Security Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for CIBR and 0.47% for IHAK.
CIBR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.77 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CIBR and IHAK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer