CIBR vs. HACK
Compare and contrast key facts about First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) and ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF (HACK).
CIBR and HACK are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CIBR is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index. It was launched on Jul 7, 2015. HACK is a passively managed fund by ETFMG that tracks the performance of the Prime Cyber Defense Index. It was launched on Nov 11, 2014. Both CIBR and HACK are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CIBR or HACK.
Performance
CIBR vs. HACK - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CIBR achieves a 14.30% return, which is significantly lower than HACK's 17.54% return.
CIBR
14.30%
-1.43%
10.01%
28.77%
15.85%
N/A
HACK
17.54%
-0.46%
12.76%
31.35%
12.15%
11.47%
Key characteristics
| CIBR | HACK | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.52 | 1.63 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.03 | 2.15 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.27 | 1.29 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.93 | 1.52 |
| Martin Ratio | 5.90 | 6.25 |
| Ulcer Index | 4.81% | 4.83% |
| Daily Std Dev | 18.65% | 18.54% |
| Max Drawdown | -33.89% | -42.68% |
| Current Drawdown | -4.92% | -5.20% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CIBR vs. HACK - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both CIBR and HACK have an expense ratio of 0.60%.
Correlation
The correlation between CIBR and HACK is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CIBR vs. HACK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) and ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF (HACK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CIBR vs. HACK - Dividend Comparison
CIBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, more than HACK's 0.19% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF | 0.43% | 0.42% | 0.30% | 0.59% | 1.10% | 0.23% | 0.22% | 0.10% | 0.77% | 0.58% |
HACK ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF | 0.19% | 0.21% | 0.24% | 0.26% | 1.11% | 0.14% | 0.09% | 0.01% | 1.23% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CIBR vs. HACK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CIBR drawdown since its inception was -33.89%, smaller than the maximum HACK drawdown of -42.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIBR and HACK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CIBR vs. HACK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) is 6.31%, while ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF (HACK) has a volatility of 6.74%. This indicates that CIBR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HACK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.