PortfoliosLab logo
CIBR vs. HACK
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between CIBR and HACK is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.7

Performance

CIBR vs. HACK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) and ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF (HACK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

150.00%200.00%250.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
230.80%
139.48%
CIBR
HACK

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CIBR:

0.81

HACK:

0.67

Sortino Ratio

CIBR:

1.24

HACK:

1.08

Omega Ratio

CIBR:

1.16

HACK:

1.15

Calmar Ratio

CIBR:

0.97

HACK:

0.78

Martin Ratio

CIBR:

3.51

HACK:

2.87

Ulcer Index

CIBR:

5.54%

HACK:

5.92%

Daily Std Dev

CIBR:

24.15%

HACK:

25.35%

Max Drawdown

CIBR:

-33.89%

HACK:

-42.68%

Current Drawdown

CIBR:

-12.83%

HACK:

-15.33%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CIBR achieves a -1.19% return, which is significantly higher than HACK's -5.87% return.


CIBR

YTD

-1.19%

1M

-5.05%

6M

3.60%

1Y

15.72%

5Y*

17.63%

10Y*

N/A

HACK

YTD

-5.87%

1M

-7.32%

6M

1.11%

1Y

13.21%

5Y*

12.50%

10Y*

9.17%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CIBR vs. HACK - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CIBR and HACK have an expense ratio of 0.60%.


Expense ratio chart for CIBR: current value is 0.60%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
CIBR: 0.60%
Expense ratio chart for HACK: current value is 0.60%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
HACK: 0.60%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CIBR vs. HACK — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CIBR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CIBR is 7979
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CIBR is 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CIBR is 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CIBR is 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CIBR is 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CIBR is 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

HACK
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of HACK is 7474
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of HACK is 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of HACK is 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of HACK is 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of HACK is 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of HACK is 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CIBR vs. HACK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) and ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF (HACK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for CIBR, currently valued at 0.81, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00
CIBR: 0.81
HACK: 0.67
The chart of Sortino ratio for CIBR, currently valued at 1.24, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
CIBR: 1.24
HACK: 1.08
The chart of Omega ratio for CIBR, currently valued at 1.16, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.50
CIBR: 1.16
HACK: 1.15
The chart of Calmar ratio for CIBR, currently valued at 0.97, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00
CIBR: 0.97
HACK: 0.78
The chart of Martin ratio for CIBR, currently valued at 3.51, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.00
CIBR: 3.51
HACK: 2.87

The current CIBR Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is comparable to the HACK Sharpe Ratio of 0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CIBR and HACK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.50NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
0.81
0.67
CIBR
HACK

Dividends

CIBR vs. HACK - Dividend Comparison

CIBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, more than HACK's 0.15% yield.


TTM2024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CIBR
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF
0.26%0.29%0.42%0.30%0.59%1.10%0.23%0.22%0.10%0.77%0.58%
HACK
ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF
0.15%0.14%0.21%0.24%0.26%1.11%0.14%0.09%0.01%1.23%0.00%

Drawdowns

CIBR vs. HACK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIBR drawdown since its inception was -33.89%, smaller than the maximum HACK drawdown of -42.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIBR and HACK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-12.83%
-15.33%
CIBR
HACK

Volatility

CIBR vs. HACK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) is 14.49%, while ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF (HACK) has a volatility of 15.87%. This indicates that CIBR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HACK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
14.49%
15.87%
CIBR
HACK