CIBR vs. BUG
Compare and contrast key facts about First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) and Global X Cybersecurity ETF (BUG).
CIBR and BUG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CIBR is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index. It was launched on Jul 7, 2015. BUG is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Indxx Cybersecurity Index. It was launched on Oct 25, 2019. Both CIBR and BUG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
CIBR vs. BUG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CIBR vs. BUG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF | -12.12% | 13.06% | 18.21% | 39.71% | -26.46% | 19.67% | 50.53% | 5.23% |
BUG Global X Cybersecurity ETF | -17.56% | -5.04% | 9.59% | 41.40% | -33.63% | 13.24% | 70.83% | 6.55% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CIBR achieves a -12.12% return, which is significantly higher than BUG's -17.56% return.
CIBR
- 1D
- 3.11%
- 1M
- -0.19%
- YTD
- -12.12%
- 6M
- -17.17%
- 1Y
- 0.06%
- 3Y*
- 14.11%
- 5Y*
- 8.62%
- 10Y*
- 14.52%
BUG
- 1D
- 3.33%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- -17.56%
- 6M
- -28.62%
- 1Y
- -22.33%
- 3Y*
- 2.39%
- 5Y*
- 0.17%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CIBR vs. BUG - Expense Ratio Comparison
CIBR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than BUG's 0.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CIBR vs. BUG — Risk / Return Rank
CIBR
BUG
CIBR vs. BUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) and Global X Cybersecurity ETF (BUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CIBR | BUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.00 | -0.80 | +0.80 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.17 | -1.00 | +1.18 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 0.88 | +0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.03 | -0.66 | +0.63 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.07 | -1.53 | +1.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CIBR | BUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00 | -0.80 | +0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | 0.01 | +0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 0.29 | +0.22 |
Correlation
The correlation between CIBR and BUG is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CIBR vs. BUG - Dividend Comparison
CIBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, more than BUG's 0.05% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF | 0.65% | 0.42% | 0.29% | 0.42% | 0.31% | 0.59% | 1.10% | 0.23% | 0.23% | 0.10% | 0.77% | 0.58% |
BUG Global X Cybersecurity ETF | 0.05% | 0.04% | 0.09% | 0.10% | 1.56% | 0.66% | 0.46% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CIBR vs. BUG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CIBR drawdown since its inception was -33.89%, smaller than the maximum BUG drawdown of -41.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIBR and BUG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CIBR | BUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.89% | -41.66% | +7.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.96% | -35.69% | +13.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.89% | -41.66% | +7.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.89% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.50% | -32.85% | +13.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.66% | -14.21% | +5.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.02% | 15.33% | -7.31% |
Volatility
CIBR vs. BUG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) is 7.04%, while Global X Cybersecurity ETF (BUG) has a volatility of 8.65%. This indicates that CIBR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CIBR | BUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.04% | 8.65% | -1.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.45% | 19.90% | -3.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.46% | 28.21% | -3.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.21% | 27.45% | -3.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.22% | 28.70% | -5.48% |