FVD vs. FTCS
FVD (First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund) and FTCS (First Trust Capital Strength ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FVD is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Value Line Dividend Index, while FTCS is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the The Capital Strength Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FVD returned 8.54%/yr vs 10.41%/yr for FTCS. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FVD charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.53%/yr for FTCS.
Performance
FVD vs. FTCS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FVD achieves a 3.30% return, which is significantly higher than FTCS's 0.55% return. Over the past 10 years, FVD has underperformed FTCS with an annualized return of 8.54%, while FTCS has yielded a comparatively higher 10.41% annualized return.
FVD
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- -1.17%
- YTD
- 3.30%
- 6M
- 2.96%
- 1Y
- 9.84%
- 3Y*
- 8.73%
- 5Y*
- 5.99%
- 10Y*
- 8.54%
FTCS
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- -1.88%
- YTD
- 0.55%
- 6M
- -0.32%
- 1Y
- 5.44%
- 3Y*
- 9.28%
- 5Y*
- 5.80%
- 10Y*
- 10.41%
FVD vs. FTCS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FVD First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund | 3.30% | 8.16% | 10.04% | 4.11% | -5.18% | 25.08% | -0.02% | 26.58% | -3.49% | 12.51% |
FTCS First Trust Capital Strength ETF | 0.55% | 6.46% | 11.19% | 8.48% | -10.22% | 26.75% | 13.05% | 26.71% | -4.22% | 26.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between FVD and FTCS is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2006 | 0.83 |
The correlation between FVD and FTCS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
FVD vs. FTCS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FVD
FTCS
Financial Services
Utilities
-
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Real Estate
-
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Financial Services
FVD
FTCS
Utilities
FVD
FTCS
-
Industrials
FVD
FTCS
Consumer Defensive
FVD
FTCS
Healthcare
FVD
FTCS
Real Estate
FVD
FTCS
-
Technology
FVD
FTCS
Consumer Cyclical
FVD
FTCS
Energy
FVD
FTCS
Communication Services
FVD
FTCS
Basic Materials
FVD
FTCS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FVD vs. FTCS — Risk / Return Rank
FVD
FTCS
FVD vs. FTCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund (FVD) and First Trust Capital Strength ETF (FTCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FVD | FTCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.10 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.37 | 0.71 | +0.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.52 | 1.63 | +1.89 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FVD vs. FTCS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FVD drawdown since its inception was -51.00%, roughly equal to the maximum FTCS drawdown of -53.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FVD and FTCS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FVD | FTCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.00% | -53.64% | +2.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.23% | -7.74% | +0.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.97% | -12.62% | +0.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.41% | -20.93% | +4.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.25% | -31.93% | -3.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.95% | -6.45% | +1.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.44% | -6.92% | +1.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.80% | 3.34% | -0.54% |
Volatility
FVD vs. FTCS - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund (FVD) and First Trust Capital Strength ETF (FTCS) have volatilities of 3.12% and 2.99%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FVD | FTCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.12% | 2.99% | +0.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.05% | 7.22% | -0.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.73% | 9.95% | -0.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.76% | 13.14% | -0.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.46% | 15.55% | -0.09% |
FVD vs. FTCS - Expense Ratio Comparison
FVD has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than FTCS's 0.53% expense ratio.
Dividends
FVD vs. FTCS - Dividend Comparison
FVD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.29%, more than FTCS's 1.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTCS First Trust Capital Strength ETF | 1.12% | 1.04% | 1.33% | 1.47% | 1.23% | 1.06% | 0.93% | 1.26% | 1.26% | 1.15% | 1.43% | 1.50% |
FVD First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund | 2.29% | 2.36% | 2.23% | 2.34% | 2.20% | 1.75% | 2.31% | 2.03% | 2.50% | 2.10% | 2.04% | 2.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FVD and FTCS have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FVD has higher volatility (3.12%) compared to FTCS (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FVD dropped -51.00% vs FTCS's -53.64%.
On 10-year performance, FTCS leads with 10.41% vs 8.54% for FVD. On fees, FTCS is cheaper at 0.53% per year. On volatility, FTCS has been the lower-risk option at 2.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FTCS has performed better with a 10.41% return vs 8.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FTCS is cheaper with a 0.53% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for FVD.
FVD has the higher dividend yield at 2.29%, compared with 1.12% for FTCS.
FVD is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while FTCS is Large Cap Blend Equities. FVD tracks Value Line Dividend Index, while FTCS tracks The Capital Strength Index. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for FVD and 0.53% for FTCS.
FVD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.02 vs 0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FVD and FTCS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer