PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FVD vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FVD vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund (FVD) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FVD having a 10.07% return and VOO slightly higher at 10.16%. Over the past 10 years, FVD has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 8.75%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.14% annualized return.


FVD

1D
-0.18%
1M
1.52%
6M
5.94%
YTD
10.07%
1Y
14.68%
3Y*
9.72%
5Y*
6.75%
10Y*
8.75%
ALL TIME*
9.74%

VOO

1D
0.71%
1M
0.26%
6M
8.58%
YTD
10.16%
1Y
21.58%
3Y*
19.42%
5Y*
12.83%
10Y*
15.14%
ALL TIME*
14.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$21.15M$21.63M$33.04M
$3.82B$3.78B$5.44B

FVD vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FVD
First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund
10.07%8.16%10.04%4.11%-5.18%25.08%-0.02%26.58%-3.49%12.51%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
10.16%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between FVD and VOO is 0.23, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010

0.79

Over the past year, the correlation between FVD and VOO has dropped to 0.23 - well below their long-term average of 0.79, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FVD vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FVD
VOO

Financial Services

19.8%
11.4%

Utilities

17.3%
2.2%

Industrials

14.4%
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

10.9%
4.5%

Healthcare

8.2%
8.9%

Real Estate

8.1%
1.8%

Technology

6.7%
38.6%

Consumer Cyclical

5.3%
9.5%

Energy

3.5%
3.0%

Communication Services

3.1%
9.9%

Basic Materials

2.8%
1.7%

Financial Services

FVD
19.8%
VOO
11.4%

Utilities

FVD
17.3%
VOO
2.2%

Industrials

FVD
14.4%
VOO
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

FVD
10.9%
VOO
4.5%

Healthcare

FVD
8.2%
VOO
8.9%

Real Estate

FVD
8.1%
VOO
1.8%

Technology

FVD
6.7%
VOO
38.6%

Consumer Cyclical

FVD
5.3%
VOO
9.5%

Energy

FVD
3.5%
VOO
3.0%

Communication Services

FVD
3.1%
VOO
9.9%

Basic Materials

FVD
2.8%
VOO
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FVD vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FVD
FVD Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
FVD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FVD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
FVD Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
FVD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
FVD Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FVD vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund (FVD) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FVDVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.28

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.99

2.21

-0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.07

9.44

-4.37

FVD vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FVD Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FVD and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FVD vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FVD drawdown since its inception was -51.00%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FVD and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FVDVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.00%

-33.99%

-17.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.23%

-8.90%

+1.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.97%

-18.69%

+6.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.41%

-24.52%

+8.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.25%

-33.99%

-1.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.72%

-1.38%

-0.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.42%

-3.67%

-1.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.83%

2.08%

+0.75%

Volatility

FVD vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund (FVD) has a higher volatility of 4.37% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 3.54%. This indicates that FVD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FVDVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.37%

3.54%

+0.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.01%

10.10%

-2.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.14%

12.82%

-2.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.84%

16.93%

-4.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.47%

18.01%

-2.54%

FVD vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FVD has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

FVD vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

FVD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.23%, more than VOO's 1.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FVD
First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund
2.23%2.36%2.23%2.34%2.20%1.75%2.31%2.03%2.50%2.10%2.04%2.34%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.07%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


FVD and VOO have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FVD has higher volatility (4.37%) compared to VOO (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FVD dropped -51.00% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 15.14% vs 8.75% for FVD. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 3.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 15.14% return vs 8.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for FVD.

FVD has the higher dividend yield at 2.23%, compared with 1.07% for VOO.

FVD is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. FVD tracks Value Line Dividend Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for FVD and 0.03% for VOO.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FVD and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer