FDIS vs. CIBR
FDIS (Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF) and CIBR (First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FDIS is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Consumer Discretionary Index, while CIBR is a Cybersecurity fund tracking the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FDIS returned 13.98%/yr vs 17.88%/yr for CIBR. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FDIS charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for CIBR.
Performance
FDIS vs. CIBR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDIS achieves a 0.01% return, which is significantly lower than CIBR's 19.63% return. Over the past 10 years, FDIS has underperformed CIBR with an annualized return of 13.98%, while CIBR has yielded a comparatively higher 17.88% annualized return.
FDIS
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 2.10%
- YTD
- 0.01%
- 6M
- -1.14%
- 1Y
- 12.39%
- 3Y*
- 13.37%
- 5Y*
- 6.04%
- 10Y*
- 13.98%
CIBR
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 7.94%
- YTD
- 19.63%
- 6M
- 15.68%
- 1Y
- 18.53%
- 3Y*
- 24.30%
- 5Y*
- 13.58%
- 10Y*
- 17.88%
FDIS vs. CIBR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDIS Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF | 0.01% | 5.67% | 24.43% | 40.48% | -35.23% | 24.25% | 49.50% | 27.44% | -0.88% | 22.96% |
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF | 19.63% | 13.06% | 18.21% | 39.71% | -26.46% | 19.67% | 50.53% | 28.52% | 1.47% | 18.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDIS and CIBR is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2015 | 0.69 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FDIS and CIBR has dropped to 0.39 - well below their long-term average of 0.69, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
FDIS vs. CIBR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FDIS
CIBR
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Technology
Industrials
Communication Services
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Energy
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
FDIS
CIBR
-
Consumer Defensive
FDIS
CIBR
-
Technology
FDIS
CIBR
Industrials
FDIS
CIBR
Communication Services
FDIS
CIBR
Healthcare
FDIS
CIBR
-
Real Estate
FDIS
CIBR
-
Financial Services
FDIS
CIBR
-
Basic Materials
FDIS
-
CIBR
-
Energy
FDIS
-
CIBR
-
Utilities
FDIS
-
CIBR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDIS vs. CIBR — Risk / Return Rank
FDIS
CIBR
FDIS vs. CIBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FDIS | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.14 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.72 | 0.79 | -0.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.24 | 1.86 | +0.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FDIS vs. CIBR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDIS drawdown since its inception was -39.16%, which is greater than CIBR's maximum drawdown of -33.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDIS and CIBR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDIS | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.16% | -33.89% | -5.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.50% | -21.99% | +6.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.43% | -21.99% | -5.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.16% | -33.89% | -5.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.16% | -33.89% | -5.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.58% | -9.53% | +4.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.49% | -8.66% | +1.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.01% | 9.38% | -4.37% |
Volatility
FDIS vs. CIBR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) is 6.19%, while First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) has a volatility of 12.35%. This indicates that FDIS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDIS | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.19% | 12.35% | -6.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.44% | 21.72% | -8.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.52% | 25.16% | -6.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.92% | 25.04% | -1.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.32% | 23.65% | -1.33% |
FDIS vs. CIBR - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDIS has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than CIBR's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDIS vs. CIBR - Dividend Comparison
FDIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, more than CIBR's 0.48% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF | 0.48% | 0.42% | 0.29% | 0.42% | 0.31% | 0.59% | 1.10% | 0.23% | 0.23% | 0.10% | 0.77% | 0.58% |
FDIS Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF | 0.73% | 0.75% | 0.69% | 0.78% | 1.00% | 0.58% | 0.59% | 1.14% | 1.29% | 1.00% | 1.62% | 1.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDIS and CIBR have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CIBR has higher volatility (12.35%) compared to FDIS (6.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDIS dropped -39.16% vs CIBR's -33.89%.
On 10-year performance, CIBR leads with 17.88% vs 13.98% for FDIS. On fees, FDIS is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FDIS has been the lower-risk option at 6.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, CIBR has performed better with a 17.88% return vs 13.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FDIS is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for CIBR.
FDIS has the higher dividend yield at 0.73%, compared with 0.48% for CIBR.
FDIS is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while CIBR is Cybersecurity. FDIS tracks MSCI USA IMI Consumer Discretionary Index, while CIBR tracks Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FDIS and 0.60% for CIBR.
CIBR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.69 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDIS and CIBR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer