PortfoliosLab logo
FAT vs. NU
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between FAT and NU is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

FAT vs. NU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FAT Brands Inc. (FAT) and Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FAT:

-0.15

NU:

0.18

Sortino Ratio

FAT:

0.26

NU:

0.73

Omega Ratio

FAT:

1.03

NU:

1.10

Calmar Ratio

FAT:

-0.07

NU:

0.39

Martin Ratio

FAT:

-0.26

NU:

0.80

Ulcer Index

FAT:

16.79%

NU:

19.28%

Daily Std Dev

FAT:

52.18%

NU:

48.30%

Max Drawdown

FAT:

-81.65%

NU:

-72.07%

Current Drawdown

FAT:

-53.61%

NU:

-17.37%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FAT:

$48.20M

NU:

$65.08B

EPS

FAT:

-$11.96

NU:

$0.44

PS Ratio

FAT:

0.08

NU:

11.53

PB Ratio

FAT:

12.81

NU:

7.56

Total Revenue (TTM)

FAT:

$142.46B

NU:

$11.46B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FAT:

$46.04B

NU:

$5.32B

EBITDA (TTM)

FAT:

-$68.82B

NU:

$3.06B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAT achieves a -9.24% return, which is significantly lower than NU's 26.74% return.


FAT

YTD

-9.24%

1M

6.32%

6M

-9.92%

1Y

-7.91%

5Y*

38.61%

10Y*

N/A

NU

YTD

26.74%

1M

21.13%

6M

-13.56%

1Y

8.60%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FAT vs. NU — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FAT is 4444
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FAT is 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FAT is 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FAT is 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FAT is 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FAT is 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

NU
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NU is 6161
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NU is 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NU is 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NU is 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NU is 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NU is 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FAT vs. NU - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FAT Brands Inc. (FAT) and Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current FAT Sharpe Ratio is -0.15, which is lower than the NU Sharpe Ratio of 0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAT and NU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

FAT vs. NU - Dividend Comparison

FAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.80%, while NU has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2024202320222021202020192018
FAT
FAT Brands Inc.
5.80%10.53%9.24%10.92%4.66%0.00%6.37%18.89%
NU
Nu Holdings Ltd.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FAT vs. NU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAT drawdown since its inception was -81.65%, which is greater than NU's maximum drawdown of -72.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAT and NU. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

FAT vs. NU - Volatility Comparison

FAT Brands Inc. (FAT) has a higher volatility of 18.62% compared to Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU) at 8.32%. This indicates that FAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

FAT vs. NU - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between FAT Brands Inc. and Nu Holdings Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00B100.00B150.00B20212022202320242025
142.02B
2.86B
(FAT) Total Revenue
(NU) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

FAT vs. NU - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between FAT Brands Inc. and Nu Holdings Ltd. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
32.3%
45.7%
(FAT) Gross Margin
(NU) Gross Margin
FAT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, FAT Brands Inc. reported a gross profit of 45.92B and revenue of 142.02B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.3%.

NU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Nu Holdings Ltd. reported a gross profit of 1.31B and revenue of 2.86B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.7%.

FAT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, FAT Brands Inc. reported an operating income of -8.57B and revenue of 142.02B, resulting in an operating margin of -6.0%.

NU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Nu Holdings Ltd. reported an operating income of 767.45M and revenue of 2.86B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.9%.

FAT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, FAT Brands Inc. reported a net income of -45.97B and revenue of 142.02B, resulting in a net margin of -32.4%.

NU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Nu Holdings Ltd. reported a net income of 552.64M and revenue of 2.86B, resulting in a net margin of 19.3%.