FAT vs. NU
FAT (FAT Brands Inc.) and NU (Nu Holdings Ltd.) are both stocks. FAT operates in Restaurants (Consumer Cyclical), while NU operates in Banks - Diversified (Financial Services). Over the past 3 years, FAT returned -62.32%/yr vs 19.62%/yr for NU. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FAT vs. NU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FAT achieves a -48.32% return, which is significantly lower than NU's -28.73% return.
FAT
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- -48.32%
- 6M
- -73.93%
- 1Y
- -92.54%
- 3Y*
- -62.32%
- 5Y*
- -48.69%
- 10Y*
- —
NU
- 1D
- -8.16%
- 1M
- -17.38%
- YTD
- -28.73%
- 6M
- -32.25%
- 1Y
- -0.58%
- 3Y*
- 19.62%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FAT vs. NU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAT FAT Brands Inc. | -48.32% | -89.39% | -3.66% | 32.64% | -50.03% | 1.63% |
NU Nu Holdings Ltd. | -28.73% | 61.58% | 24.37% | 104.67% | -56.61% | -9.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between FAT and NU is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2021 | 0.14 |
Fundamentals
FAT:
$2.91M
NU:
$58.58B
FAT:
-$12.65
NU:
$0.65
FAT:
0.01
NU:
3.34
FAT:
$574.14M
NU:
$17.54B
FAT:
$157.40M
NU:
$7.67B
FAT:
-$45.08M
NU:
$4.14B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FAT vs. NU — Risk / Return Rank
FAT
NU
FAT vs. NU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FAT Brands Inc. (FAT) and Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FAT | NU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.95 | -0.02 | -0.94 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.54 | 0.25 | -2.79 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.56 | 1.03 | -0.48 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.99 | -0.02 | -0.97 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.38 | -0.05 | -1.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FAT | NU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.95 | -0.02 | -0.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.74 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.41 | 0.06 | -0.47 |
Drawdowns
FAT vs. NU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FAT drawdown since its inception was -97.48%, which is greater than NU's maximum drawdown of -72.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAT and NU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FAT | NU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.48% | -72.07% | -25.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -94.21% | -36.41% | -57.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -96.59% | -39.58% | -57.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -97.48% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -97.48% | -36.41% | -61.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -49.83% | -29.74% | -20.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 67.25% | 13.93% | +53.32% |
Volatility
FAT vs. NU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FAT Brands Inc. (FAT) is 0.00%, while Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU) has a volatility of 13.41%. This indicates that FAT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FAT | NU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.00% | 13.41% | -13.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 97.93% | 28.38% | +69.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 97.68% | 38.61% | +59.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 66.34% | 58.47% | +7.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 77.28% | 58.47% | +18.81% |
Dividends
FAT vs. NU - Dividend Comparison
Neither FAT nor NU has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAT FAT Brands Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 10.53% | 9.24% | 10.92% | 4.91% | 0.00% | 2.64% | 7.66% |
NU Nu Holdings Ltd. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
FAT vs. NU - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between FAT Brands Inc. and Nu Holdings Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FAT vs. NU - Profitability Comparison
FAT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FAT Brands Inc. reported a gross profit of 37.49M and revenue of 140.01M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.8%.
NU - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nu Holdings Ltd. reported a gross profit of 2.00B and revenue of 4.98B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.2%.
FAT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FAT Brands Inc. reported an operating income of -17.34M and revenue of 140.01M, resulting in an operating margin of -12.4%.
NU - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nu Holdings Ltd. reported an operating income of 954.31M and revenue of 4.98B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.2%.
FAT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FAT Brands Inc. reported a net income of -58.22M and revenue of 140.01M, resulting in a net margin of -41.6%.
NU - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nu Holdings Ltd. reported a net income of 872.06M and revenue of 4.98B, resulting in a net margin of 17.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
FAT and NU have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NU has higher volatility (13.41%) compared to FAT (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAT dropped -97.48% vs NU's -72.07%.
NU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.02 vs -0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FAT and NU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer