FAT vs. ACI

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FAT (FAT Brands Inc.) and ACI (Albertsons Companies, Inc.) are both stocks. FAT operates in Restaurants (Consumer Cyclical), while ACI operates in Grocery Stores (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 5 years, FAT returned -49.21%/yr vs 3.23%/yr for ACI. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

FAT vs. ACI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FAT Brands Inc. (FAT) and Albertsons Companies, Inc. (ACI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAT achieves a -48.32% return, which is significantly lower than ACI's -6.76% return.

FAT

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: -48.32%
• 6M: -69.26%
• 1Y: -92.84%
• 3Y*: -62.32%
• 5Y*: -49.21%
• 10Y*: —

ACI

• 1D: 0.77%
• 1M: -3.56%
• YTD: -6.76%
• 6M: -10.76%
• 1Y: -24.68%
• 3Y*: -5.91%
• 5Y*: 3.23%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FAT vs. ACI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FAT FAT Brands Inc.	-48.32%	-89.39%	-3.66%	32.64%	-50.03%	86.50%	84.78%
ACI Albertsons Companies, Inc.	-6.76%	-9.96%	-12.54%	13.42%	-6.81%	75.18%	14.57%

Correlation

The correlation between FAT and ACI is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.00
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.00
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2020	0.04

Fundamentals

Market Cap FAT : $2.91M ACI : $8.01B
EPS FAT : -$12.65 ACI : $0.40
PS Ratio FAT : 0.01 ACI : 0.10
Total Revenue (TTM) FAT : $574.14M ACI : $83.17B
Gross Profit (TTM) FAT : $157.40M ACI : $22.18B
EBITDA (TTM) FAT : -$45.08M ACI : $3.42B

Return for Risk

FAT vs. ACI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAT

FAT Risk / Return Rank: 3
FAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
FAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
FAT Omega Ratio Rank: 0
FAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
FAT Martin Ratio Rank: 9

ACI

ACI Risk / Return Rank: 9
ACI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
ACI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
ACI Omega Ratio Rank: 10
ACI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
ACI Martin Ratio Rank: 12

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAT vs. ACI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FAT Brands Inc. (FAT) and Albertsons Companies, Inc. (ACI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FAT	ACI	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.96	-0.85	-0.11
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-2.59	-1.24	-1.35
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.55	0.86	-0.32
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.99	-0.84	-0.15
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.36	-1.25	-0.11
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FAT vs. ACI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAT Sharpe Ratio is -0.96, which is comparable to the ACI Sharpe Ratio of -0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAT and ACI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FAT	ACI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.96	-0.85	-0.11
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.75	0.11	-0.85
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.41	0.25	-0.66

Drawdowns

FAT vs. ACI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAT drawdown since its inception was -97.48%, which is greater than ACI's maximum drawdown of -37.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAT and ACI.

Drawdown Indicators

	FAT	ACI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.48%	-37.32%	-60.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-94.21%	-29.61%	-64.60%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-96.59%	-29.66%	-66.93%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-97.48%	-37.32%	-60.16%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-97.48%	-36.35%	-61.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-49.85%	-18.49%	-31.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	67.51%	19.77%	+47.74%

Volatility

FAT vs. ACI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FAT Brands Inc. (FAT) is 0.00%, while Albertsons Companies, Inc. (ACI) has a volatility of 8.65%. This indicates that FAT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FAT	ACI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.00%	8.65%	-8.65%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	92.92%	20.54%	+72.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	97.68%	29.27%	+68.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	66.34%	30.27%	+36.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	77.26%	31.25%	+46.01%

Dividends

FAT vs. ACI - Dividend Comparison

FAT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ACI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.95%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
ACI Albertsons Companies, Inc.	3.95%	3.49%	2.44%	2.09%	35.34%	1.39%	0.57%	0.00%	0.00%
FAT FAT Brands Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	10.53%	9.24%	10.92%	4.91%	0.00%	2.64%	7.66%

Financials

FAT vs. ACI - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between FAT Brands Inc. and Albertsons Companies, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

FAT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FAT Brands Inc. reported a gross profit of 37.49M and revenue of 140.01M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.8%.

ACI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Albertsons Companies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 5.09B and revenue of 20.25B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.1%.

FAT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FAT Brands Inc. reported an operating income of -17.34M and revenue of 140.01M, resulting in an operating margin of -12.4%.

ACI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Albertsons Companies, Inc. reported an operating income of -490.20M and revenue of 20.25B, resulting in an operating margin of -2.4%.

FAT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FAT Brands Inc. reported a net income of -58.22M and revenue of 140.01M, resulting in a net margin of -41.6%.

ACI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Albertsons Companies, Inc. reported a net income of -480.80M and revenue of 20.25B, resulting in a net margin of -2.4%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FAT and ACI in my portfolio?

FAT and ACI have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FAT or ACI?

ACI has higher volatility (8.65%) compared to FAT (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAT dropped -97.48% vs ACI's -37.32%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ACI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.85 vs -0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.