FAT vs. HOLX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

FAT (FAT Brands Inc.) and HOLX (Hologic, Inc.) are both stocks. FAT operates in Restaurants (Consumer Cyclical), while HOLX operates in Medical Instruments & Supplies (Healthcare). At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

FAT vs. HOLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FAT Brands Inc. (FAT) and Hologic, Inc. (HOLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

FAT

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: -48.32%
• 6M: -73.93%
• 1Y: -92.54%
• 3Y*: -62.32%
• 5Y*: -48.69%
• 10Y*: —

HOLX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FAT vs. HOLX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FAT FAT Brands Inc.	-48.32%	-89.39%	-3.66%	32.64%	-50.03%	86.50%	30.77%	-1.21%	-44.62%	-21.20%
HOLX Hologic, Inc.	2.04%	3.33%	0.90%	-4.49%	-2.29%	5.12%	39.49%	27.03%	-3.86%	14.92%

Correlation

The correlation between FAT and HOLX is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.25
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.18
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.15
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2017	0.10

The correlation between FAT and HOLX shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (all time) to 0.25 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap FAT : $2.91M HOLX : $17.17B
EPS FAT : -$12.65 HOLX : $2.41
PS Ratio FAT : 0.01 HOLX : 4.16
Total Revenue (TTM) FAT : $574.14M HOLX : $4.13B
Gross Profit (TTM) FAT : $157.40M HOLX : $2.18B
EBITDA (TTM) FAT : -$45.08M HOLX : $1.01B

Return for Risk

FAT vs. HOLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAT

FAT Risk / Return Rank: 3
FAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
FAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
FAT Omega Ratio Rank: 0
FAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
FAT Martin Ratio Rank: 8

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAT vs. HOLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FAT Brands Inc. (FAT) and Hologic, Inc. (HOLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FAT	HOLX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.95	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-2.54	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.56	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.99	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.38	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FAT	HOLX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.95	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.74	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.41	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	FAT	HOLX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.48%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-94.21%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-96.59%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-97.48%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-97.48%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-49.83%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	67.25%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FAT	HOLX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.00%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	97.93%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	97.68%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	66.34%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	77.28%	—	—

Dividends

FAT vs. HOLX - Dividend Comparison

Neither FAT nor HOLX has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FAT FAT Brands Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	10.53%	9.24%	10.92%	4.91%	0.00%	2.64%	7.66%
HOLX Hologic, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

FAT vs. HOLX - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between FAT Brands Inc. and Hologic, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

FAT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FAT Brands Inc. reported a gross profit of 37.49M and revenue of 140.01M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.8%.

HOLX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hologic, Inc. reported a gross profit of 586.40M and revenue of 1.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.0%.

FAT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FAT Brands Inc. reported an operating income of -17.34M and revenue of 140.01M, resulting in an operating margin of -12.4%.

HOLX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hologic, Inc. reported an operating income of 237.00M and revenue of 1.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.6%.

FAT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FAT Brands Inc. reported a net income of -58.22M and revenue of 140.01M, resulting in a net margin of -41.6%.

HOLX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hologic, Inc. reported a net income of 179.10M and revenue of 1.05B, resulting in a net margin of 17.1%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FAT and HOLX in my portfolio?

FAT and HOLX have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.