FAT vs. POAGX
FAT (FAT Brands Inc.) is a stock, while POAGX (PrimeCap Odyssey Aggressive Growth Fund) is Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by PRIMECAP Odyssey Funds. Over the past 5 years, FAT returned -49.21%/yr vs 10.82%/yr for POAGX. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FAT vs. POAGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FAT achieves a -48.32% return, which is significantly lower than POAGX's 25.05% return.
FAT
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- -48.32%
- 6M
- -69.26%
- 1Y
- -92.84%
- 3Y*
- -62.32%
- 5Y*
- -49.21%
- 10Y*
- —
POAGX
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- 16.75%
- YTD
- 25.05%
- 6M
- 26.41%
- 1Y
- 60.37%
- 3Y*
- 25.56%
- 5Y*
- 10.82%
- 10Y*
- 15.87%
FAT vs. POAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAT FAT Brands Inc. | -48.32% | -89.39% | -3.66% | 32.64% | -50.03% | 86.50% | 30.77% | -1.21% | -44.62% | -21.20% |
POAGX PrimeCap Odyssey Aggressive Growth Fund | 25.05% | 28.68% | 12.56% | 25.02% | -24.25% | 4.02% | 29.17% | 23.52% | -7.10% | 8.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between FAT and POAGX is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2017 | 0.18 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FAT vs. POAGX — Risk / Return Rank
FAT
POAGX
FAT vs. POAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FAT Brands Inc. (FAT) and PrimeCap Odyssey Aggressive Growth Fund (POAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FAT | POAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.96 | 3.07 | -4.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.59 | 4.02 | -6.61 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.55 | 1.52 | -0.97 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.99 | 3.71 | -4.70 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.36 | 15.14 | -16.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FAT | POAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.96 | 3.07 | -4.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.75 | 0.47 | -1.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.70 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.41 | 0.64 | -1.05 |
Drawdowns
FAT vs. POAGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FAT drawdown since its inception was -97.48%, which is greater than POAGX's maximum drawdown of -55.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAT and POAGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FAT | POAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.48% | -55.77% | -41.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -94.21% | -16.87% | -77.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -96.59% | -24.73% | -71.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -97.48% | -38.80% | -58.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.80% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -97.48% | 0.00% | -97.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -49.85% | -9.54% | -40.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 67.51% | 4.12% | +63.39% |
Volatility
FAT vs. POAGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FAT Brands Inc. (FAT) is 0.00%, while PrimeCap Odyssey Aggressive Growth Fund (POAGX) has a volatility of 7.94%. This indicates that FAT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than POAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FAT | POAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.00% | 7.94% | -7.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 92.92% | 16.25% | +76.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 97.68% | 20.35% | +77.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 66.34% | 22.90% | +43.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 77.26% | 22.90% | +54.36% |
Dividends
FAT vs. POAGX - Dividend Comparison
FAT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while POAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.60%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAT FAT Brands Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 10.53% | 9.24% | 10.92% | 4.91% | 0.00% | 2.64% | 7.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
POAGX PrimeCap Odyssey Aggressive Growth Fund | 10.60% | 13.25% | 9.90% | 5.54% | 10.78% | 5.93% | 7.84% | 5.33% | 7.82% | 0.86% | 16.63% | 12.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FAT and POAGX have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
POAGX has higher volatility (7.94%) compared to FAT (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAT dropped -97.48% vs POAGX's -55.77%.
POAGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.07 vs -0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FAT and POAGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer