PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FAT vs. POAGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FAT vs. POAGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FAT Brands Inc. (FAT) and PrimeCap Odyssey Aggressive Growth Fund (POAGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FAT vs. POAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FAT
FAT Brands Inc.
-48.32%-89.39%-3.66%32.64%-50.03%86.50%30.77%-1.21%-44.62%-21.20%
POAGX
PrimeCap Odyssey Aggressive Growth Fund
-6.55%28.68%12.56%25.02%-24.25%4.02%29.17%23.52%-7.10%8.90%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAT achieves a -48.32% return, which is significantly lower than POAGX's -6.55% return.


FAT

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
-48.32%
6M
-91.44%
1Y
-94.19%
3Y*
-63.58%
5Y*
-45.21%
10Y*

POAGX

1D
4.56%
1M
-7.93%
YTD
-6.55%
6M
-0.22%
1Y
30.59%
3Y*
15.20%
5Y*
4.33%
10Y*
12.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FAT vs. POAGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAT
FAT Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
FAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAT Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
FAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAT Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

POAGX
POAGX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
POAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
POAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
POAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
POAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
POAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAT vs. POAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FAT Brands Inc. (FAT) and PrimeCap Odyssey Aggressive Growth Fund (POAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FATPOAGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.93

1.25

-2.19

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-2.71

1.81

-4.52

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.59

1.25

-0.67

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-1.00

1.73

-2.73

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.65

7.07

-8.73

FAT vs. POAGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAT Sharpe Ratio is -0.93, which is lower than the POAGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAT and POAGX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FATPOAGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.93

1.25

-2.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.68

0.19

-0.87

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.42

0.58

-0.99

Correlation

The correlation between FAT and POAGX is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

FAT vs. POAGX - Dividend Comparison

FAT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while POAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.18%.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FAT
FAT Brands Inc.
0.00%0.00%10.53%9.24%10.92%4.91%0.00%2.64%7.66%0.00%0.00%0.00%
POAGX
PrimeCap Odyssey Aggressive Growth Fund
14.18%13.25%9.90%5.54%10.78%5.93%7.84%5.33%7.82%0.86%16.63%12.52%

Drawdowns

FAT vs. POAGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAT drawdown since its inception was -97.48%, which is greater than POAGX's maximum drawdown of -55.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAT and POAGX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FATPOAGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.48%

-55.77%

-41.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-94.41%

-16.87%

-77.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-97.48%

-38.80%

-58.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-97.48%

-13.08%

-84.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-48.88%

-9.58%

-39.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

57.25%

4.13%

+53.12%

Volatility

FAT vs. POAGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FAT Brands Inc. (FAT) is 0.00%, while PrimeCap Odyssey Aggressive Growth Fund (POAGX) has a volatility of 8.65%. This indicates that FAT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than POAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FATPOAGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.00%

8.65%

-8.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

102.12%

15.69%

+86.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

101.56%

24.15%

+77.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

67.00%

22.65%

+44.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

78.05%

22.75%

+55.30%