FAT vs. LUMN
Compare and contrast key facts about FAT Brands Inc. (FAT) and Lumen Technologies, Inc. (LUMN).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FAT or LUMN.
Key characteristics
| FAT | LUMN | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -6.46% | 282.51% |
| 1Y Return | -9.73% | 525.00% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -16.25% | -17.85% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 27.83% | -8.04% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.08 | 4.60 |
| Sortino Ratio | 0.24 | 5.08 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.04 | 1.64 |
| Calmar Ratio | -0.07 | 6.45 |
| Martin Ratio | -0.14 | 27.24 |
| Ulcer Index | 30.63% | 22.55% |
| Daily Std Dev | 50.38% | 133.54% |
| Max Drawdown | -81.65% | -95.26% |
| Current Drawdown | -50.38% | -66.13% |
Fundamentals
| FAT | LUMN | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $89.47M | $7.12B |
| EPS | -$8.07 | -$2.10 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | $462.64M | $10.08B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $128.00M | $2.79B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $27.44M | $2.57B |
Correlation
The correlation between FAT and LUMN is 0.10, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
FAT vs. LUMN - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, FAT achieves a -6.46% return, which is significantly lower than LUMN's 282.51% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FAT vs. LUMN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FAT Brands Inc. (FAT) and Lumen Technologies, Inc. (LUMN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FAT vs. LUMN - Dividend Comparison
FAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.57%, while LUMN has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAT FAT Brands Inc. | 10.57% | 9.24% | 10.92% | 4.91% | 0.00% | 6.37% | 18.88% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LUMN Lumen Technologies, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 14.37% | 7.97% | 10.26% | 7.57% | 14.26% | 12.95% | 9.08% | 8.59% | 5.46% | 6.78% |
Drawdowns
FAT vs. LUMN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FAT drawdown since its inception was -81.65%, smaller than the maximum LUMN drawdown of -95.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAT and LUMN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FAT vs. LUMN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FAT Brands Inc. (FAT) is 7.94%, while Lumen Technologies, Inc. (LUMN) has a volatility of 19.44%. This indicates that FAT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LUMN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
FAT vs. LUMN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between FAT Brands Inc. and Lumen Technologies, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities