PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NU vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NU vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NU achieves a -14.40% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 10.16% return.


NU

1D
-1.10%
1M
5.29%
6M
-19.27%
YTD
-14.40%
1Y
18.92%
3Y*
21.91%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
5.35%

VOO

1D
0.71%
1M
0.26%
6M
8.58%
YTD
10.16%
1Y
21.58%
3Y*
19.42%
5Y*
12.83%
10Y*
15.14%
ALL TIME*
14.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.35B$1.45B$991.86M
$3.82B$3.78B$5.44B

NU vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
NU
Nu Holdings Ltd.
-14.40%61.58%24.37%104.67%-56.61%-16.62%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
10.16%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%1.50%

Correlation

The correlation between NU and VOO is 0.53, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2021

0.50

The correlation between NU and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NU vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NU
NU Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
NU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
NU Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
NU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
NU Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NU vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NUVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.28

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.45

2.21

-1.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.96

9.44

-8.48

NU vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NU Sharpe Ratio is 0.47, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NU and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NU vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NU drawdown since its inception was -72.07%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NU and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NUVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.07%

-33.99%

-38.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.17%

-8.90%

-29.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.58%

-18.69%

-20.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.61%

-1.38%

-22.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.71%

-3.67%

-26.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.07%

2.08%

+15.99%

Volatility

NU vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU) has a higher volatility of 10.41% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 3.54%. This indicates that NU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NUVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.41%

3.54%

+6.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.73%

10.10%

+19.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.31%

12.82%

+24.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

57.94%

16.93%

+41.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

57.94%

18.01%

+39.93%

Dividends

NU vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

NU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NU
Nu Holdings Ltd.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.07%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


NU and VOO have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NU has higher volatility (10.41%) compared to VOO (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NU dropped -72.07% vs VOO's -33.99%.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NU and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer