FANG vs. MAR
FANG (Diamondback Energy, Inc.) and MAR (Marriott International, Inc.) are both stocks. FANG operates in Oil & Gas E&P (Energy), while MAR operates in Lodging (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, FANG returned 10.83%/yr vs 21.03%/yr for MAR. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FANG vs. MAR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FANG having a 29.28% return and MAR slightly higher at 30.26%. Over the past 10 years, FANG has underperformed MAR with an annualized return of 10.83%, while MAR has yielded a comparatively higher 21.03% annualized return.
FANG
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- -4.06%
- YTD
- 29.28%
- 6M
- 24.04%
- 1Y
- 27.23%
- 3Y*
- 18.15%
- 5Y*
- 22.17%
- 10Y*
- 10.83%
MAR
- 1D
- 1.42%
- 1M
- 14.11%
- YTD
- 30.26%
- 6M
- 35.28%
- 1Y
- 59.26%
- 3Y*
- 31.68%
- 5Y*
- 23.91%
- 10Y*
- 21.03%
FANG vs. MAR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FANG Diamondback Energy, Inc. | 29.28% | -5.64% | 10.35% | 19.66% | 35.34% | 127.51% | -46.00% | 0.92% | -26.35% | 24.93% |
MAR Marriott International, Inc. | 30.26% | 12.31% | 24.92% | 53.06% | -9.34% | 25.26% | -12.53% | 41.49% | -19.05% | 66.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between FANG and MAR is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2012 | 0.29 |
The correlation between FANG and MAR shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.29 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
FANG:
$1.40
MAR:
$12.66
FANG:
137.12
MAR:
31.80
FANG:
3.64
MAR:
3.78
FANG:
$15.19B
MAR:
$21.73B
FANG:
$7.30B
MAR:
$1.31B
FANG:
$5.54B
MAR:
$3.81B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FANG vs. MAR — Risk / Return Rank
FANG
MAR
FANG vs. MAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) and Marriott International, Inc. (MAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FANG | MAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.35 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.56 | 4.31 | -1.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.99 | 10.89 | -5.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FANG vs. MAR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FANG drawdown since its inception was -88.72%, which is greater than MAR's maximum drawdown of -75.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FANG and MAR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FANG | MAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.72% | -75.59% | -13.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.53% | -12.65% | +0.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.10% | -30.50% | -11.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.10% | -30.50% | -11.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -88.72% | -61.26% | -27.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.59% | 0.00% | -9.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.37% | -14.90% | -4.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.43% | 5.01% | +1.42% |
Volatility
FANG vs. MAR - Volatility Comparison
Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) has a higher volatility of 11.03% compared to Marriott International, Inc. (MAR) at 6.92%. This indicates that FANG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FANG | MAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.03% | 6.92% | +4.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.10% | 19.94% | +4.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.48% | 26.32% | +5.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.99% | 28.84% | +9.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.05% | 32.90% | +16.15% |
Dividends
FANG vs. MAR - Dividend Comparison
FANG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.16%, more than MAR's 0.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FANG Diamondback Energy, Inc. | 2.16% | 2.66% | 5.06% | 5.15% | 6.55% | 1.62% | 3.10% | 0.74% | 0.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MAR Marriott International, Inc. | 0.68% | 0.85% | 0.86% | 0.87% | 0.67% | 0.00% | 0.36% | 1.22% | 1.44% | 0.95% | 1.39% | 1.42% |
Financials
FANG vs. MAR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Diamondback Energy, Inc. and Marriott International, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
FANG and MAR have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FANG has higher volatility (11.03%) compared to MAR (6.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FANG dropped -88.72% vs MAR's -75.59%.
MAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FANG and MAR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer