PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MAR vs. TTWO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MAR vs. TTWO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Marriott International, Inc. (MAR) and Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. (TTWO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAR achieves a 20.95% return, which is significantly higher than TTWO's -13.14% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MAR having a 19.66% annualized return and TTWO not far behind at 19.08%.


MAR

1D
-0.85%
1M
5.50%
YTD
20.95%
6M
23.16%
1Y
44.35%
3Y*
29.47%
5Y*
22.61%
10Y*
19.66%

TTWO

1D
-2.03%
1M
2.94%
YTD
-13.14%
6M
-9.91%
1Y
-2.29%
3Y*
17.38%
5Y*
4.58%
10Y*
19.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAR vs. TTWO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MAR
Marriott International, Inc.
20.95%12.31%24.92%53.06%-9.34%25.26%-12.53%41.49%-19.05%66.24%
TTWO
Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.
-13.14%39.09%14.37%54.57%-41.41%-14.47%69.72%18.93%-6.23%122.72%

Correlation

The correlation between MAR and TTWO is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 1997

0.25

The correlation between MAR and TTWO shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (1 year) to 0.28 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

MAR:

$12.66

TTWO:

-$1.62

PS Ratio

MAR:

3.51

TTWO:

6.13

Total Revenue (TTM)

MAR:

$21.73B

TTWO:

$6.66B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MAR:

$1.31B

TTWO:

$3.81B

EBITDA (TTM)

MAR:

$3.81B

TTWO:

$850.50M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MAR vs. TTWO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAR
MAR Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
MAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAR Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
MAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAR Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

TTWO
TTWO Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
TTWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TTWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
TTWO Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
TTWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
TTWO Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAR vs. TTWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Marriott International, Inc. (MAR) and Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. (TTWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MARTTWODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.71

-0.08

+1.79

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.61

0.09

+2.52

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.01

+0.28

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.39

-0.06

+3.46

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.53

-0.14

+8.67

MAR vs. TTWO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAR Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is higher than the TTWO Sharpe Ratio of -0.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAR and TTWO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MARTTWODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.71

-0.08

+1.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.14

+0.65

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

0.56

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.29

+0.17

Drawdowns

MAR vs. TTWO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAR drawdown since its inception was -75.59%, smaller than the maximum TTWO drawdown of -80.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAR and TTWO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MARTTWODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.59%

-80.85%

+5.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.65%

-27.68%

+15.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.50%

-27.68%

-2.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.50%

-51.50%

+21.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.26%

-56.14%

-5.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.14%

-15.22%

+12.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.91%

-27.81%

+12.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.03%

12.37%

-7.34%

Volatility

MAR vs. TTWO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Marriott International, Inc. (MAR) is 7.01%, while Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. (TTWO) has a volatility of 11.05%. This indicates that MAR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TTWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MARTTWODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.01%

11.05%

-4.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.04%

23.82%

-3.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.12%

29.22%

-3.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.82%

32.32%

-3.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.88%

34.04%

-1.16%

Dividends

MAR vs. TTWO - Dividend Comparison

MAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, while TTWO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MAR
Marriott International, Inc.
0.73%0.85%0.86%0.87%0.67%0.00%0.36%1.22%1.44%0.95%1.39%1.42%
TTWO
Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

MAR vs. TTWO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Marriott International, Inc. and Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B7.00B20222023202420252026
1.81B
1.68B
(MAR) Total Revenue
(TTWO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


MAR and TTWO have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TTWO has higher volatility (11.05%) compared to MAR (7.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAR dropped -75.59% vs TTWO's -80.85%.

MAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs -0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MAR and TTWO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer