MAR vs. HLT

In the year-to-date period, MAR achieves a 26.94% return, which is significantly lower than HLT's 38.69% return. Over the past 10 years, MAR has underperformed HLT with an annualized return of 15.08%, while HLT has yielded a comparatively higher 17.54% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Marriott International, Inc. (MAR) and Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. (HLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current MAR Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is lower than the HLT Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAR and HLT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

MAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, more than HLT's 0.24% yield.

The maximum MAR drawdown since its inception was -75.90%, which is greater than HLT's maximum drawdown of -50.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAR and HLT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Marriott International, Inc. (MAR) has a higher volatility of 7.57% compared to Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. (HLT) at 5.47%. This indicates that MAR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Marriott International, Inc. and Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.