FANG vs. QQQ
FANG (Diamondback Energy, Inc.) is a stock, while QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) is Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Over the past 10 years, FANG returned 10.98%/yr vs 20.19%/yr for QQQ. Their 0.26 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
FANG vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FANG achieves a 28.05% return, which is significantly higher than QQQ's 10.22% return. Over the past 10 years, FANG has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 10.98%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 20.19% annualized return.
FANG
- 1D
- -2.81%
- 1M
- 5.78%
- 6M
- 20.98%
- YTD
- 28.05%
- 1Y
- 29.69%
- 3Y*
- 13.41%
- 5Y*
- 24.22%
- 10Y*
- 10.98%
- ALL TIME*
- 21.07%
QQQ
- 1D
- -0.97%
- 1M
- -4.39%
- 6M
- 7.28%
- YTD
- 10.22%
- 1Y
- 19.47%
- 3Y*
- 21.47%
- 5Y*
- 13.69%
- 10Y*
- 20.19%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.57%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $359.73M | $390.04M | $464.19M | |
| $27.38B | $27.21B | $30.90B |
FANG vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FANG Diamondback Energy, Inc. | 28.05% | -5.64% | 10.35% | 19.66% | 35.34% | 127.51% | -46.00% | 0.92% | -26.35% | 24.93% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 10.22% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 48.62% | 38.96% | -0.13% | 32.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between FANG and QQQ is -0.10, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.17 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2012 | 0.26 |
The correlation between FANG and QQQ shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FANG vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
FANG
QQQ
FANG vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FANG | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.19 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.56 | 1.63 | -0.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.41 | 5.42 | -1.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FANG vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FANG drawdown since its inception was -88.72%, which is greater than QQQ's maximum drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FANG and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FANG | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.72% | -82.97% | -5.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.09% | -11.96% | -7.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.10% | -22.77% | -19.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.10% | -35.12% | -6.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -88.72% | -35.12% | -53.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.45% | -9.37% | -1.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.31% | -32.63% | +13.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.76% | 3.60% | +3.16% |
Volatility
FANG vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) has a higher volatility of 10.68% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 6.59%. This indicates that FANG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FANG | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.68% | 6.59% | +4.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.94% | 15.65% | +8.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.52% | 18.99% | +12.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.35% | 22.84% | +14.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.08% | 22.48% | +26.60% |
Dividends
FANG vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
FANG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.18%, more than QQQ's 0.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FANG Diamondback Energy, Inc. | 2.18% | 2.66% | 5.06% | 5.15% | 6.55% | 1.62% | 3.10% | 0.74% | 0.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.45% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FANG and QQQ have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FANG has higher volatility (10.68%) compared to QQQ (6.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FANG dropped -88.72% vs QQQ's -82.97%.
QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.03 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FANG and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer