FANG vs. AOS
Compare and contrast key facts about Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) and A. O. Smith Corporation (AOS).
Performance
FANG vs. AOS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FANG vs. AOS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FANG Diamondback Energy, Inc. | 27.56% | -5.64% | 10.35% | 19.66% | 35.34% | 127.51% | -46.00% | 0.92% | -26.35% | 24.93% |
AOS A. O. Smith Corporation | -2.21% | 0.07% | -15.92% | 47.30% | -32.07% | 59.28% | 17.46% | 13.65% | -29.35% | 30.78% |
Fundamentals
FANG:
$54.48B
AOS:
$9.11B
FANG:
$5.75
AOS:
$3.87
FANG:
33.15
AOS:
16.83
FANG:
3.68
AOS:
2.40
FANG:
1.47
AOS:
4.27
FANG:
$14.98B
AOS:
$3.83B
FANG:
$7.48B
AOS:
$1.49B
FANG:
$7.31B
AOS:
$792.20M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FANG achieves a 27.56% return, which is significantly higher than AOS's -2.21% return. Over the past 10 years, FANG has outperformed AOS with an annualized return of 12.44%, while AOS has yielded a comparatively lower 7.10% annualized return.
FANG
- 1D
- -3.63%
- 1M
- 7.15%
- YTD
- 27.56%
- 6M
- 34.51%
- 1Y
- 21.73%
- 3Y*
- 16.36%
- 5Y*
- 23.73%
- 10Y*
- 12.44%
AOS
- 1D
- -1.30%
- 1M
- -16.49%
- YTD
- -2.21%
- 6M
- -10.05%
- 1Y
- 1.24%
- 3Y*
- -0.06%
- 5Y*
- 1.05%
- 10Y*
- 7.10%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FANG vs. AOS — Risk / Return Rank
FANG
AOS
FANG vs. AOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) and A. O. Smith Corporation (AOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FANG | AOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.56 | 0.05 | +0.51 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.98 | 0.26 | +0.72 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.03 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.86 | 0.08 | +0.78 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.18 | 0.21 | +1.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FANG | AOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 | 0.05 | +0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 | 0.04 | +0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 | 0.26 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.43 | +0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between FANG and AOS is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FANG vs. AOS - Dividend Comparison
FANG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%, less than AOS's 2.15% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FANG Diamondback Energy, Inc. | 2.12% | 2.66% | 5.06% | 5.15% | 6.55% | 1.62% | 3.10% | 0.74% | 0.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
AOS A. O. Smith Corporation | 2.15% | 2.06% | 1.91% | 1.84% | 1.99% | 1.23% | 1.79% | 1.89% | 1.78% | 0.91% | 1.01% | 0.99% |
Drawdowns
FANG vs. AOS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FANG drawdown since its inception was -88.72%, which is greater than AOS's maximum drawdown of -66.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FANG and AOS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FANG | AOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.72% | -66.07% | -22.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.16% | -20.86% | -5.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.10% | -42.68% | +0.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -88.72% | -46.81% | -41.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.72% | -26.83% | +21.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.57% | -20.43% | +0.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.33% | 7.73% | +2.60% |
Volatility
FANG vs. AOS - Volatility Comparison
Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) has a higher volatility of 8.16% compared to A. O. Smith Corporation (AOS) at 7.69%. This indicates that FANG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AOS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FANG | AOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.16% | 7.69% | +0.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.91% | 17.29% | +3.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.22% | 25.90% | +13.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.39% | 26.94% | +11.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.95% | 26.90% | +22.05% |
Financials
FANG vs. AOS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Diamondback Energy, Inc. and A. O. Smith Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities