FANG vs. AOS
Compare and contrast key facts about Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) and A. O. Smith Corporation (AOS).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FANG or AOS.
Correlation
The correlation between FANG and AOS is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
FANG vs. AOS - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
FANG:
0.14
AOS:
-0.54
FANG:
0.39
AOS:
-0.59
FANG:
1.05
AOS:
0.92
FANG:
0.15
AOS:
-0.52
FANG:
0.42
AOS:
-1.26
FANG:
9.21%
AOS:
10.25%
FANG:
28.20%
AOS:
23.82%
FANG:
-88.72%
AOS:
-66.52%
FANG:
-25.29%
AOS:
-24.67%
Fundamentals
FANG:
$46.76B
AOS:
$10.27B
FANG:
$17.33
AOS:
$3.79
FANG:
9.24
AOS:
18.68
FANG:
1.20
AOS:
2.00
FANG:
$9.57B
AOS:
$3.89B
FANG:
$6.02B
AOS:
$1.49B
FANG:
$6.66B
AOS:
$818.50M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FANG achieves a 4.36% return, which is significantly higher than AOS's -15.30% return. Over the past 10 years, FANG has outperformed AOS with an annualized return of 12.21%, while AOS has yielded a comparatively lower 11.18% annualized return.
FANG
4.36%
-14.61%
-17.44%
3.57%
17.01%
12.21%
AOS
-15.30%
-4.22%
-17.65%
-14.38%
9.77%
11.18%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FANG vs. AOS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) and A. O. Smith Corporation (AOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FANG vs. AOS - Dividend Comparison
FANG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.35%, more than AOS's 1.89% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FANG Diamondback Energy, Inc. | 5.35% | 5.15% | 6.55% | 1.62% | 3.10% | 0.74% | 0.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
AOS A. O. Smith Corporation | 1.89% | 1.84% | 1.99% | 1.23% | 1.79% | 1.89% | 1.78% | 0.91% | 1.01% | 0.99% | 1.06% | 0.85% |
Drawdowns
FANG vs. AOS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FANG drawdown since its inception was -88.72%, which is greater than AOS's maximum drawdown of -66.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FANG and AOS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FANG vs. AOS - Volatility Comparison
Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) has a higher volatility of 7.53% compared to A. O. Smith Corporation (AOS) at 5.99%. This indicates that FANG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AOS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
FANG vs. AOS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Diamondback Energy, Inc. and A. O. Smith Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities