FANG vs. AOS
Compare and contrast key facts about Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) and A. O. Smith Corporation (AOS).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FANG or AOS.
Correlation
The correlation between FANG and AOS is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
FANG vs. AOS - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
FANG:
-0.63
AOS:
-0.76
FANG:
-0.71
AOS:
-0.95
FANG:
0.90
AOS:
0.88
FANG:
-0.60
AOS:
-0.57
FANG:
-1.33
AOS:
-1.02
FANG:
19.06%
AOS:
19.11%
FANG:
39.17%
AOS:
25.80%
FANG:
-88.72%
AOS:
-66.52%
FANG:
-29.68%
AOS:
-24.31%
Fundamentals
FANG:
$42.71B
AOS:
$9.96B
FANG:
$16.08
AOS:
$3.58
FANG:
9.09
AOS:
19.59
FANG:
1.20
AOS:
1.83
FANG:
3.48
AOS:
2.62
FANG:
1.09
AOS:
5.37
FANG:
$12.87B
AOS:
$3.80B
FANG:
$8.81B
AOS:
$1.45B
FANG:
$8.98B
AOS:
$768.80M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FANG achieves a -10.98% return, which is significantly lower than AOS's 1.23% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FANG having a 8.81% annualized return and AOS not far behind at 8.75%.
FANG
-10.98%
13.46%
-19.58%
-25.10%
35.88%
8.81%
AOS
1.23%
5.37%
-5.56%
-19.42%
13.24%
8.75%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FANG vs. AOS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
FANG
AOS
FANG vs. AOS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) and A. O. Smith Corporation (AOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
FANG vs. AOS - Dividend Comparison
FANG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.62%, more than AOS's 1.96% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FANG Diamondback Energy, Inc. | 3.62% | 5.06% | 5.15% | 6.55% | 1.62% | 3.10% | 0.74% | 0.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
AOS A. O. Smith Corporation | 1.96% | 1.91% | 1.84% | 1.99% | 1.23% | 1.79% | 1.89% | 1.78% | 0.91% | 1.01% | 0.99% | 1.06% |
Drawdowns
FANG vs. AOS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FANG drawdown since its inception was -88.72%, which is greater than AOS's maximum drawdown of -66.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FANG and AOS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Loading data...
Volatility
FANG vs. AOS - Volatility Comparison
Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) has a higher volatility of 11.73% compared to A. O. Smith Corporation (AOS) at 8.48%. This indicates that FANG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AOS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...
Financials
FANG vs. AOS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Diamondback Energy, Inc. and A. O. Smith Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FANG vs. AOS - Profitability Comparison
FANG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Diamondback Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.71B and revenue of 4.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 91.6%.
AOS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, A. O. Smith Corporation reported a gross profit of 375.40M and revenue of 963.90M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.0%.
FANG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Diamondback Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of 17.00M and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.4%.
AOS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, A. O. Smith Corporation reported an operating income of 182.80M and revenue of 963.90M, resulting in an operating margin of 19.0%.
FANG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Diamondback Energy, Inc. reported a net income of 1.41B and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in a net margin of 34.7%.
AOS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, A. O. Smith Corporation reported a net income of 136.60M and revenue of 963.90M, resulting in a net margin of 14.2%.