FANG vs. APA
Compare and contrast key facts about Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) and Apache Corporation (APA).
Performance
FANG vs. APA - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FANG vs. APA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FANG Diamondback Energy, Inc. | 27.56% | -5.64% | 10.35% | 19.66% | 35.34% | 127.51% | -46.00% | 0.92% | -26.35% | 24.93% |
APA Apache Corporation | 70.66% | 11.54% | -33.44% | -21.24% | 76.44% | 90.76% | -43.71% | 1.12% | -36.39% | -32.13% |
Fundamentals
FANG:
$54.48B
APA:
$14.68B
FANG:
$5.75
APA:
$3.99
FANG:
33.15
APA:
10.36
FANG:
3.68
APA:
1.67
FANG:
1.47
APA:
1.32
FANG:
$14.98B
APA:
$8.92B
FANG:
$7.48B
APA:
$2.62B
FANG:
$7.31B
APA:
$4.29B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FANG achieves a 27.56% return, which is significantly lower than APA's 70.66% return. Over the past 10 years, FANG has outperformed APA with an annualized return of 12.44%, while APA has yielded a comparatively lower 1.12% annualized return.
FANG
- 1D
- -3.63%
- 1M
- 7.15%
- YTD
- 27.56%
- 6M
- 34.51%
- 1Y
- 21.73%
- 3Y*
- 16.36%
- 5Y*
- 23.73%
- 10Y*
- 12.44%
APA
- 1D
- -2.57%
- 1M
- 30.48%
- YTD
- 70.66%
- 6M
- 68.44%
- 1Y
- 105.81%
- 3Y*
- 8.71%
- 5Y*
- 20.35%
- 10Y*
- 1.12%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FANG vs. APA — Risk / Return Rank
FANG
APA
FANG vs. APA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) and Apache Corporation (APA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FANG | APA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.56 | 1.93 | -1.38 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.98 | 2.39 | -1.41 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.33 | -0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.86 | 3.15 | -2.29 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.18 | 9.88 | -7.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FANG | APA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 | 1.93 | -1.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 | 0.42 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 | 0.02 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.17 | +0.30 |
Correlation
The correlation between FANG and APA is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FANG vs. APA - Dividend Comparison
FANG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%, less than APA's 2.42% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FANG Diamondback Energy, Inc. | 2.12% | 2.66% | 5.06% | 5.15% | 6.55% | 1.62% | 3.10% | 0.74% | 0.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
APA Apache Corporation | 2.42% | 4.09% | 4.33% | 2.79% | 1.34% | 0.51% | 2.29% | 3.91% | 3.81% | 2.37% | 1.58% | 2.25% |
Drawdowns
FANG vs. APA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FANG drawdown since its inception was -88.72%, smaller than the maximum APA drawdown of -96.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FANG and APA.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FANG | APA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.72% | -96.73% | +8.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.16% | -33.95% | +7.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.10% | -70.47% | +28.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -88.72% | -93.49% | +4.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.72% | -60.99% | +55.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.57% | -40.25% | +20.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.33% | 10.81% | -0.48% |
Volatility
FANG vs. APA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) is 8.16%, while Apache Corporation (APA) has a volatility of 11.45%. This indicates that FANG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than APA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FANG | APA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.16% | 11.45% | -3.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.91% | 31.61% | -10.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.22% | 54.99% | -15.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.39% | 48.52% | -10.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.95% | 58.23% | -9.28% |
Financials
FANG vs. APA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Diamondback Energy, Inc. and Apache Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities