PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FANG vs. APA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


FANGAPA
YTD Return30.40%-18.46%
1Y Return36.65%-32.46%
3Y Return (Ann)44.11%17.73%
5Y Return (Ann)19.82%7.89%
10Y Return (Ann)10.94%-10.11%
Sharpe Ratio1.52-0.99
Daily Std Dev24.48%31.64%
Max Drawdown-88.72%-100.00%
Current Drawdown-6.65%-100.00%

Fundamentals


FANGAPA
Market Cap$34.74B$10.52B
EPS$19.32$9.24
PE Ratio10.083.08
PEG Ratio1.200.17
Total Revenue (TTM)$9.27B$8.97B
Gross Profit (TTM)$5.84B$4.11B
EBITDA (TTM)$6.51B$4.96B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.7

The correlation between FANG and APA is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

FANG vs. APA - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, FANG achieves a 30.40% return, which is significantly higher than APA's -18.46% return. Over the past 10 years, FANG has outperformed APA with an annualized return of 10.94%, while APA has yielded a comparatively lower -10.11% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%500.00%1,000.00%MarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugust
1,291.20%
-57.99%
FANG
APA

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Diamondback Energy, Inc.

Apache Corporation

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FANG vs. APA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) and Apache Corporation (APA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FANG
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FANG, currently valued at 1.52, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.001.52
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FANG, currently valued at 2.25, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.25
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FANG, currently valued at 1.28, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.28
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FANG, currently valued at 3.04, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.003.04
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FANG, currently valued at 6.85, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.006.85
APA
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for APA, currently valued at -0.99, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.00-0.99
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for APA, currently valued at -1.36, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-1.36
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for APA, currently valued at 0.84, compared to the broader market0.501.001.500.84
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for APA, currently valued at -0.46, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.00-0.46
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for APA, currently valued at -1.18, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.00-1.18

FANG vs. APA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FANG Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is higher than the APA Sharpe Ratio of -0.99. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of FANG and APA.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00MarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugust
1.52
-0.99
FANG
APA

Dividends

FANG vs. APA - Dividend Comparison

FANG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.53%, more than APA's 3.50% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
FANG
Diamondback Energy, Inc.
5.53%5.15%6.55%1.62%3.10%0.74%0.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
APA
Apache Corporation
3.50%2.79%1.34%0.51%2.29%3.91%3.81%2.37%1.58%2.25%1.52%0.90%

Drawdowns

FANG vs. APA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FANG drawdown since its inception was -88.72%, smaller than the maximum APA drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FANG and APA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%MarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugust
-6.65%
-66.02%
FANG
APA

Volatility

FANG vs. APA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) is 9.15%, while Apache Corporation (APA) has a volatility of 12.44%. This indicates that FANG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than APA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%MarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugust
9.15%
12.44%
FANG
APA

Financials

FANG vs. APA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Diamondback Energy, Inc. and Apache Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items