PortfoliosLab logo
FANG vs. APA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between FANG and APA is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

FANG vs. APA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) and Apache Corporation (APA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FANG:

-0.76

APA:

-0.79

Sortino Ratio

FANG:

-0.91

APA:

-0.97

Omega Ratio

FANG:

0.88

APA:

0.86

Calmar Ratio

FANG:

-0.71

APA:

-0.46

Martin Ratio

FANG:

-1.48

APA:

-1.41

Ulcer Index

FANG:

20.16%

APA:

28.69%

Daily Std Dev

FANG:

39.15%

APA:

51.22%

Max Drawdown

FANG:

-88.72%

APA:

-96.73%

Current Drawdown

FANG:

-34.21%

APA:

-84.49%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FANG:

$40.26B

APA:

$6.26B

EPS

FANG:

$16.26

APA:

$2.82

PE Ratio

FANG:

8.48

APA:

6.15

PEG Ratio

FANG:

1.20

APA:

0.17

PS Ratio

FANG:

3.28

APA:

0.62

PB Ratio

FANG:

1.05

APA:

1.15

Total Revenue (TTM)

FANG:

$12.86B

APA:

$10.42B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FANG:

$6.94B

APA:

$4.17B

EBITDA (TTM)

FANG:

$8.96B

APA:

$4.88B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FANG achieves a -16.72% return, which is significantly higher than APA's -24.33% return. Over the past 10 years, FANG has outperformed APA with an annualized return of 8.06%, while APA has yielded a comparatively lower -9.70% annualized return.


FANG

YTD

-16.72%

1M

2.63%

6M

-23.17%

1Y

-29.68%

3Y*

0.88%

5Y*

31.47%

10Y*

8.06%

APA

YTD

-24.33%

1M

9.46%

6M

-22.86%

1Y

-40.17%

3Y*

-26.46%

5Y*

12.02%

10Y*

-9.70%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Diamondback Energy, Inc.

Apache Corporation

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FANG vs. APA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FANG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FANG is 1010
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FANG is 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FANG is 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FANG is 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FANG is 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FANG is 66
Martin Ratio Rank

APA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of APA is 1212
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of APA is 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of APA is 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of APA is 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of APA is 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of APA is 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FANG vs. APA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) and Apache Corporation (APA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current FANG Sharpe Ratio is -0.76, which is comparable to the APA Sharpe Ratio of -0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FANG and APA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

FANG vs. APA - Dividend Comparison

FANG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.89%, less than APA's 5.88% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FANG
Diamondback Energy, Inc.
3.89%5.06%5.15%6.55%1.62%3.10%0.74%0.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
APA
Apache Corporation
5.88%4.33%2.79%1.34%0.51%2.29%3.91%3.81%2.37%1.58%2.25%1.52%

Drawdowns

FANG vs. APA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FANG drawdown since its inception was -88.72%, smaller than the maximum APA drawdown of -96.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FANG and APA.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

FANG vs. APA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) is 9.09%, while Apache Corporation (APA) has a volatility of 13.45%. This indicates that FANG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than APA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

FANG vs. APA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Diamondback Energy, Inc. and Apache Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B20212022202320242025
4.03B
2.64B
(FANG) Total Revenue
(APA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

FANG vs. APA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Diamondback Energy, Inc. and Apache Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
45.0%
38.2%
(FANG) Gross Margin
(APA) Gross Margin
FANG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Diamondback Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.81B and revenue of 4.03B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.0%.

APA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Apache Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.01B and revenue of 2.64B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.2%.

FANG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Diamondback Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.67B and revenue of 4.03B, resulting in an operating margin of 41.5%.

APA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Apache Corporation reported an operating income of 773.00M and revenue of 2.64B, resulting in an operating margin of 29.3%.

FANG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Diamondback Energy, Inc. reported a net income of 1.41B and revenue of 4.03B, resulting in a net margin of 34.9%.

APA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Apache Corporation reported a net income of 347.00M and revenue of 2.64B, resulting in a net margin of 13.2%.