PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Portfolios
Screeners
Discussions
MAR vs. LNG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

MAR vs. LNG

Last updated May 16, 2025

Compare and contrast key facts about Marriott International, Inc. (MAR) and Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG).

Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MAR or LNG.

Correlation

The correlation between MAR and LNG is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

MAR vs. LNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Marriott International, Inc. (MAR) and Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MAR:

0.57

LNG:

1.81

Sortino Ratio

MAR:

0.94

LNG:

2.30

Omega Ratio

MAR:

1.13

LNG:

1.34

Calmar Ratio

MAR:

0.51

LNG:

2.44

Martin Ratio

MAR:

1.41

LNG:

7.63

Ulcer Index

MAR:

10.95%

LNG:

7.05%

Daily Std Dev

MAR:

28.43%

LNG:

29.13%

Max Drawdown

MAR:

-75.92%

LNG:

-97.84%

Current Drawdown

MAR:

-10.63%

LNG:

-6.66%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MAR:

$74.66B

LNG:

$51.73B

EPS

MAR:

$8.80

LNG:

$13.64

PE Ratio

MAR:

30.98

LNG:

17.10

PEG Ratio

MAR:

1.62

LNG:

2.08

PS Ratio

MAR:

11.17

LNG:

3.09

PB Ratio

MAR:

47.45

LNG:

9.25

Total Revenue (TTM)

MAR:

$25.39B

LNG:

$16.89B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MAR:

$5.40B

LNG:

$8.43B

EBITDA (TTM)

MAR:

$4.16B

LNG:

$6.53B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAR achieves a -2.46% return, which is significantly lower than LNG's 10.19% return. Over the past 10 years, MAR has outperformed LNG with an annualized return of 13.97%, while LNG has yielded a comparatively lower 12.28% annualized return.

MAR

YTD

-2.46%

1M

21.97%

6M

-3.31%

1Y

16.19%

5Y*

28.60%

10Y*

13.97%

LNG

YTD

10.19%

1M

4.08%

6M

12.33%

1Y

52.40%

5Y*

42.93%

10Y*

12.28%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

MAR vs. LNG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
MAR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MAR is 6868
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MAR is 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MAR is 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MAR is 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MAR is 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MAR is 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
LNG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LNG is 9292
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LNG is 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LNG is 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LNG is 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LNG is 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LNG is 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MAR vs. LNG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Marriott International, Inc. (MAR) and Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current MAR Sharpe Ratio is 0.57, which is lower than the LNG Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAR and LNG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading data...

Dividends

MAR vs. LNG - Dividend Comparison

MAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, more than LNG's 0.82% yield.

TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
MAR
Marriott International, Inc.		0.93%0.86%0.87%0.67%0.00%0.36%1.22%1.44%0.95%1.39%1.42%0.99%
LNG
Cheniere Energy, Inc.		0.82%0.84%0.95%0.92%0.33%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

MAR vs. LNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAR drawdown since its inception was -75.92%, smaller than the maximum LNG drawdown of -97.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAR and LNG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Loading data...

Volatility

MAR vs. LNG - Volatility Comparison

Marriott International, Inc. (MAR) has a higher volatility of 8.46% compared to Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) at 7.52%. This indicates that MAR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading data...

Financials

MAR vs. LNG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Marriott International, Inc. and Cheniere Energy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.

Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities

2.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B20212022202320242025
6.26B
5.44B
(MAR) Total Revenue
(LNG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MAR vs. LNG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Marriott International, Inc. and Cheniere Energy, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual
-50.0%0.0%50.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
21.0%
20.0%
(MAR) Gross Margin
(LNG) Gross Margin
MAR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Marriott International, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.31B and revenue of 6.26B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.0%.

LNG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.09B and revenue of 5.44B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.0%.

MAR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Marriott International, Inc. reported an operating income of 948.00M and revenue of 6.26B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.1%.

LNG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of 961.00M and revenue of 5.44B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.7%.

MAR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Marriott International, Inc. reported a net income of 665.00M and revenue of 6.26B, resulting in a net margin of 10.6%.

LNG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported a net income of 353.00M and revenue of 5.44B, resulting in a net margin of 6.5%.