MAR vs. LNG

In the year-to-date period, MAR achieves a 26.94% return, which is significantly lower than LNG's 33.17% return. Over the past 10 years, MAR has outperformed LNG with an annualized return of 15.08%, while LNG has yielded a comparatively lower 12.29% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Marriott International, Inc. (MAR) and Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current MAR Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is comparable to the LNG Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAR and LNG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

MAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, more than LNG's 0.80% yield.

The maximum MAR drawdown since its inception was -75.90%, smaller than the maximum LNG drawdown of -97.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAR and LNG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Marriott International, Inc. (MAR) is 7.57%, while Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) has a volatility of 8.52%. This indicates that MAR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Marriott International, Inc. and Cheniere Energy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.