MAR vs. LNG
Compare and contrast key facts about Marriott International, Inc. (MAR) and Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MAR or LNG.
Correlation
The correlation between MAR and LNG is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
MAR vs. LNG - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
MAR:
1.52
LNG:
1.19
MAR:
2.05
LNG:
1.82
MAR:
1.27
LNG:
1.21
MAR:
1.79
LNG:
1.48
MAR:
4.91
LNG:
4.15
MAR:
6.58%
LNG:
5.63%
MAR:
21.33%
LNG:
19.71%
MAR:
-75.91%
LNG:
-97.84%
MAR:
-2.95%
LNG:
-7.54%
Fundamentals
MAR:
$80.43B
LNG:
$47.27B
MAR:
$9.55
LNG:
$15.73
MAR:
30.31
LNG:
13.39
MAR:
2.85
LNG:
0.60
MAR:
$24.77B
LNG:
$16.09B
MAR:
$4.93B
LNG:
$9.35B
MAR:
$3.95B
LNG:
$8.11B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MAR achieves a 27.17% return, which is significantly higher than LNG's 23.64% return. Over the past 10 years, MAR has outperformed LNG with an annualized return of 14.87%, while LNG has yielded a comparatively lower 11.67% annualized return.
MAR
27.17%
1.58%
17.20%
29.28%
14.21%
14.87%
LNG
23.64%
-5.33%
27.28%
22.91%
28.74%
11.67%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
MAR vs. LNG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Marriott International, Inc. (MAR) and Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
MAR vs. LNG - Dividend Comparison
MAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, less than LNG's 0.86% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAR Marriott International, Inc. | 0.85% | 0.87% | 0.67% | 0.00% | 0.36% | 1.22% | 1.44% | 0.95% | 1.39% | 1.42% | 0.99% | 1.30% |
LNG Cheniere Energy, Inc. | 0.86% | 0.95% | 0.92% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
MAR vs. LNG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MAR drawdown since its inception was -75.91%, smaller than the maximum LNG drawdown of -97.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAR and LNG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
MAR vs. LNG - Volatility Comparison
Marriott International, Inc. (MAR) and Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) have volatilities of 6.47% and 6.30%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
MAR vs. LNG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Marriott International, Inc. and Cheniere Energy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities