MAR vs. LNG

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Marriott International, Inc. (MAR) and Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG).

Performance

MAR vs. LNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Marriott International, Inc. (MAR) and Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MAR vs. LNG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MAR Marriott International, Inc.	5.63%	12.31%	24.92%	53.06%	-9.34%	25.26%	-12.53%	41.49%	-19.05%	66.24%
LNG Cheniere Energy, Inc.	46.36%	-8.70%	27.18%	15.02%	49.30%	69.48%	-1.70%	3.18%	9.94%	29.95%

Fundamentals

Market Cap MAR : $88.11B LNG : $60.98B
EPS MAR : $9.56 LNG : $24.33
PE Ratio MAR : 34.23 LNG : 11.66
PEG Ratio MAR : 0.90 LNG : 0.06
PS Ratio MAR : 3.40 LNG : 3.11
Total Revenue (TTM) MAR : $26.19B LNG : $19.98B
Gross Profit (TTM) MAR : $5.59B LNG : $5.46B
EBITDA (TTM) MAR : $4.62B LNG : $9.75B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAR achieves a 5.63% return, which is significantly lower than LNG's 46.36% return. Over the past 10 years, MAR has underperformed LNG with an annualized return of 18.26%, while LNG has yielded a comparatively higher 24.28% annualized return.

MAR

• 1D: 2.43%
• 1M: -4.29%
• YTD: 5.63%
• 6M: 26.12%
• 1Y: 38.61%
• 3Y*: 26.60%
• 5Y*: 18.04%
• 10Y*: 18.26%

LNG

• 1D: -3.36%
• 1M: 20.38%
• YTD: 46.36%
• 6M: 21.40%
• 1Y: 23.80%
• 3Y*: 22.87%
• 5Y*: 32.83%
• 10Y*: 24.28%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

MAR vs. LNG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAR

MAR Risk / Return Rank: 82
MAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
MAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
MAR Omega Ratio Rank: 77
MAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
MAR Martin Ratio Rank: 85

LNG

LNG Risk / Return Rank: 66
LNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
LNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
LNG Omega Ratio Rank: 64
LNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
LNG Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAR vs. LNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Marriott International, Inc. (MAR) and Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MAR	LNG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.31	0.81	+0.50
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.07	1.25	+0.82
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.17	+0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.03	1.19	+1.84
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.48	2.72	+4.76
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MAR vs. LNG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAR Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is higher than the LNG Sharpe Ratio of 0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAR and LNG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MAR	LNG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.31	0.81	+0.50
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.63	1.11	-0.48
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.56	0.74	-0.18
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.46	0.17	+0.29

Correlation

The correlation between MAR and LNG is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

MAR vs. LNG - Dividend Comparison

MAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, more than LNG's 0.74% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MAR Marriott International, Inc.	0.82%	0.85%	0.86%	0.87%	0.67%	0.00%	0.36%	1.22%	1.44%	0.95%	1.39%	1.42%
LNG Cheniere Energy, Inc.	0.74%	1.06%	0.84%	0.95%	0.92%	0.33%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

MAR vs. LNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAR drawdown since its inception was -75.59%, smaller than the maximum LNG drawdown of -97.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAR and LNG.

Drawdown Indicators

	MAR	LNG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-75.59%	-97.84%	+22.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.96%	-22.34%	+9.38%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.50%	-24.87%	-5.63%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-61.26%	-57.53%	-3.73%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.96%	-4.43%	-4.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.97%	-43.35%	+28.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.25%	9.78%	-4.53%

Volatility

MAR vs. LNG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Marriott International, Inc. (MAR) is 7.77%, while Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) has a volatility of 11.40%. This indicates that MAR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MAR	LNG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.77%	11.40%	-3.63%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.84%	18.17%	+1.67%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.57%	29.59%	-0.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.78%	29.87%	-1.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.76%	32.95%	-0.19%

Financials

MAR vs. LNG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Marriott International, Inc. and Cheniere Energy, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

MAR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Marriott International, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.11B and revenue of 6.69B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 16.5%.

LNG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 5.67B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

MAR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Marriott International, Inc. reported an operating income of 777.00M and revenue of 6.69B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.6%.

LNG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of 4.74B and revenue of 5.67B, resulting in an operating margin of 83.7%.

MAR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Marriott International, Inc. reported a net income of 445.00M and revenue of 6.69B, resulting in a net margin of 6.7%.

LNG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported a net income of 2.30B and revenue of 5.67B, resulting in a net margin of 40.6%.