FANG vs. VNOM

In the year-to-date period, FANG achieves a -16.30% return, which is significantly lower than VNOM's -15.16% return. Over the past 10 years, FANG has underperformed VNOM with an annualized return of 8.04%, while VNOM has yielded a comparatively higher 14.40% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) and Viper Energy Partners LP (VNOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current FANG Sharpe Ratio is -0.79, which is lower than the VNOM Sharpe Ratio of 0.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FANG and VNOM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

FANG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.56%, less than VNOM's 6.07% yield.

The maximum FANG drawdown since its inception was -88.72%, roughly equal to the maximum VNOM drawdown of -86.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FANG and VNOM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) has a higher volatility of 27.09% compared to Viper Energy Partners LP (VNOM) at 21.05%. This indicates that FANG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VNOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Diamondback Energy, Inc. and Viper Energy Partners LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.