PortfoliosLab logo
FANG vs. VNOM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between FANG and VNOM is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

FANG vs. VNOM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) and Viper Energy Partners LP (VNOM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FANG:

-0.63

VNOM:

0.61

Sortino Ratio

FANG:

-0.72

VNOM:

0.97

Omega Ratio

FANG:

0.90

VNOM:

1.13

Calmar Ratio

FANG:

-0.61

VNOM:

0.60

Martin Ratio

FANG:

-1.37

VNOM:

1.55

Ulcer Index

FANG:

18.89%

VNOM:

13.43%

Daily Std Dev

FANG:

39.17%

VNOM:

37.56%

Max Drawdown

FANG:

-88.72%

VNOM:

-86.96%

Current Drawdown

FANG:

-29.02%

VNOM:

-22.47%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FANG:

$42.03B

VNOM:

$12.17B

EPS

FANG:

$16.08

VNOM:

$3.95

PE Ratio

FANG:

8.89

VNOM:

10.68

PEG Ratio

FANG:

1.20

VNOM:

0.64

PS Ratio

FANG:

3.40

VNOM:

14.25

PB Ratio

FANG:

1.09

VNOM:

2.07

Total Revenue (TTM)

FANG:

$12.87B

VNOM:

$893.51M

Gross Profit (TTM)

FANG:

$8.81B

VNOM:

$595.55M

EBITDA (TTM)

FANG:

$8.98B

VNOM:

$884.36M

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FANG having a -10.15% return and VNOM slightly lower at -10.65%. Over the past 10 years, FANG has underperformed VNOM with an annualized return of 8.92%, while VNOM has yielded a comparatively higher 14.44% annualized return.


FANG

YTD

-10.15%

1M

13.30%

6M

-17.77%

1Y

-24.69%

5Y*

36.59%

10Y*

8.92%

VNOM

YTD

-10.65%

1M

14.90%

6M

-16.03%

1Y

22.68%

5Y*

47.53%

10Y*

14.44%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FANG vs. VNOM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FANG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FANG is 1414
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FANG is 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FANG is 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FANG is 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FANG is 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FANG is 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

VNOM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VNOM is 6969
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VNOM is 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VNOM is 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VNOM is 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VNOM is 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VNOM is 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FANG vs. VNOM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) and Viper Energy Partners LP (VNOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current FANG Sharpe Ratio is -0.63, which is lower than the VNOM Sharpe Ratio of 0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FANG and VNOM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

FANG vs. VNOM - Dividend Comparison

FANG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.25%, less than VNOM's 5.77% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FANG
Diamondback Energy, Inc.
4.25%5.06%5.15%6.55%1.62%3.10%0.74%0.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VNOM
Viper Energy Partners LP
5.77%4.89%5.58%7.68%5.16%5.85%7.38%8.14%5.27%4.83%6.16%1.38%

Drawdowns

FANG vs. VNOM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FANG drawdown since its inception was -88.72%, roughly equal to the maximum VNOM drawdown of -86.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FANG and VNOM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

FANG vs. VNOM - Volatility Comparison

Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) and Viper Energy Partners LP (VNOM) have volatilities of 11.78% and 12.19%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

FANG vs. VNOM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Diamondback Energy, Inc. and Viper Energy Partners LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B20212022202320242025
4.05B
245.00M
(FANG) Total Revenue
(VNOM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

FANG vs. VNOM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Diamondback Energy, Inc. and Viper Energy Partners LP over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
91.6%
65.7%
(FANG) Gross Margin
(VNOM) Gross Margin
FANG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Diamondback Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.71B and revenue of 4.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 91.6%.

VNOM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Viper Energy Partners LP reported a gross profit of 161.00M and revenue of 245.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 65.7%.

FANG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Diamondback Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of 17.00M and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.4%.

VNOM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Viper Energy Partners LP reported an operating income of 155.00M and revenue of 245.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 63.3%.

FANG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Diamondback Energy, Inc. reported a net income of 1.41B and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in a net margin of 34.7%.

VNOM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Viper Energy Partners LP reported a net income of 75.00M and revenue of 245.00M, resulting in a net margin of 30.6%.