PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MAR vs. CMG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MAR vs. CMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Marriott International, Inc. (MAR) and Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (CMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAR achieves a 21.91% return, which is significantly higher than CMG's -22.32% return. Over the past 10 years, MAR has outperformed CMG with an annualized return of 19.76%, while CMG has yielded a comparatively lower 12.72% annualized return.


MAR

1D
0.80%
1M
8.71%
YTD
21.91%
6M
23.34%
1Y
43.75%
3Y*
29.81%
5Y*
22.52%
10Y*
19.76%

CMG

1D
-1.78%
1M
-10.13%
YTD
-22.32%
6M
-15.30%
1Y
-42.60%
3Y*
-11.34%
5Y*
1.62%
10Y*
12.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAR vs. CMG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MAR
Marriott International, Inc.
21.91%12.31%24.92%53.06%-9.34%25.26%-12.53%41.49%-19.05%66.24%
CMG
Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.
-22.32%-38.64%31.83%64.83%-20.64%26.07%65.65%93.87%49.39%-23.40%

Correlation

The correlation between MAR and CMG is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2006

0.40

Fundamentals

EPS

MAR:

$12.66

CMG:

$1.09

PE Ratio

MAR:

29.76

CMG:

26.28

PEG Ratio

MAR:

0.78

CMG:

0.98

PS Ratio

MAR:

3.54

CMG:

3.14

Total Revenue (TTM)

MAR:

$21.73B

CMG:

$12.14B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MAR:

$1.31B

CMG:

$4.39B

EBITDA (TTM)

MAR:

$3.81B

CMG:

$2.30B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MAR vs. CMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAR
MAR Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
MAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAR Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
MAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAR Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

CMG
CMG Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
CMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMG Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
CMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMG Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAR vs. CMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Marriott International, Inc. (MAR) and Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (CMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MARCMGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

0.79

+0.50

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.48

-0.84

+4.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.72

-1.24

+9.95

MAR vs. CMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAR Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is higher than the CMG Sharpe Ratio of -1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAR and CMG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MARCMGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.69

-1.11

+2.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.05

+0.74

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

0.36

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.49

-0.02

Drawdowns

MAR vs. CMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAR drawdown since its inception was -75.59%, roughly equal to the maximum CMG drawdown of -74.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAR and CMG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MARCMGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.59%

-74.61%

-0.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.65%

-50.65%

+38.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.50%

-58.08%

+27.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.50%

-58.08%

+27.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.26%

-58.08%

-3.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.36%

-58.08%

+55.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.91%

-21.33%

+6.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.03%

34.47%

-29.44%

Volatility

MAR vs. CMG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Marriott International, Inc. (MAR) is 6.53%, while Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (CMG) has a volatility of 9.37%. This indicates that MAR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MARCMGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.53%

9.37%

-2.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.04%

22.93%

-2.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.10%

38.41%

-12.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.81%

33.50%

-4.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.88%

35.63%

-2.75%

Dividends

MAR vs. CMG - Dividend Comparison

MAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, while CMG has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CMG
Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MAR
Marriott International, Inc.
0.73%0.85%0.86%0.87%0.67%0.00%0.36%1.22%1.44%0.95%1.39%1.42%

Financials

MAR vs. CMG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Marriott International, Inc. and Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B7.00B20222023202420252026
1.81B
3.09B
(MAR) Total Revenue
(CMG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


MAR and CMG have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CMG has higher volatility (9.37%) compared to MAR (6.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAR dropped -75.59% vs CMG's -74.61%.

MAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs -1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MAR and CMG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer