F vs. ET
F (Ford Motor Company) and ET (Energy Transfer LP) are both stocks. F operates in Auto Manufacturers (Consumer Cyclical), while ET operates in Oil & Gas Midstream (Energy). Over the past 10 years, F returned 6.42%/yr vs 13.14%/yr for ET. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
F vs. ET - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, F achieves a 15.78% return, which is significantly lower than ET's 19.85% return. Over the past 10 years, F has underperformed ET with an annualized return of 6.42%, while ET has yielded a comparatively higher 13.14% annualized return.
F
- 1D
- 0.88%
- 1M
- 10.75%
- YTD
- 15.78%
- 6M
- 10.39%
- 1Y
- 49.30%
- 3Y*
- 8.25%
- 5Y*
- 4.50%
- 10Y*
- 6.42%
ET
- 1D
- 1.65%
- 1M
- -5.36%
- YTD
- 19.85%
- 6M
- 19.34%
- 1Y
- 12.14%
- 3Y*
- 24.04%
- 5Y*
- 20.15%
- 10Y*
- 13.14%
F vs. ET - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F Ford Motor Company | 15.78% | 42.35% | -13.10% | 10.18% | -42.18% | 137.48% | -3.88% | 29.64% | -34.35% | 8.73% |
ET Energy Transfer LP | 19.85% | -9.37% | 53.87% | 27.87% | 55.74% | 42.96% | -44.92% | 5.88% | -17.74% | -4.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between F and ET is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2006 | 0.31 |
The correlation between F and ET shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.34 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
F:
$60.41B
ET:
$65.93B
F:
-$1.52
ET:
$1.36
F:
0.31
ET:
0.76
F:
1.61
ET:
1.33
F:
$189.86B
ET:
$89.38B
F:
$17.42B
ET:
$20.48B
F:
$9.99B
ET:
$13.02B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
F vs. ET — Risk / Return Rank
F
ET
F vs. ET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ford Motor Company (F) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| F | ET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.13 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.16 | 1.22 | +0.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.55 | 2.70 | +2.86 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
F vs. ET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum F drawdown since its inception was -97.07%, which is greater than ET's maximum drawdown of -87.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for F and ET.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| F | ET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.07% | -87.81% | -9.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.31% | -9.38% | -12.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.51% | -24.56% | -11.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -58.62% | -25.82% | -32.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.77% | -72.82% | +8.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.52% | -6.47% | -28.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.70% | -25.72% | -18.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.65% | 4.65% | +4.00% |
Volatility
F vs. ET - Volatility Comparison
Ford Motor Company (F) has a higher volatility of 18.96% compared to Energy Transfer LP (ET) at 5.08%. This indicates that F's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| F | ET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.96% | 5.08% | +13.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.63% | 12.03% | +17.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.44% | 16.13% | +21.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.44% | 24.86% | +14.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.50% | 34.99% | +2.51% |
Dividends
F vs. ET - Dividend Comparison
F's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.04%, less than ET's 7.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ET Energy Transfer LP | 7.00% | 7.97% | 6.51% | 8.95% | 7.33% | 7.41% | 17.27% | 9.51% | 9.24% | 6.66% | 5.90% | 7.42% |
F Ford Motor Company | 4.04% | 5.72% | 7.88% | 4.92% | 4.30% | 0.48% | 1.71% | 6.45% | 9.54% | 5.20% | 7.01% | 4.26% |
Financials
F vs. ET - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ford Motor Company and Energy Transfer LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
F vs. ET - Profitability Comparison
F - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ford Motor Company reported a gross profit of 7.94B and revenue of 43.25B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 18.4%.
ET - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Energy Transfer LP reported a gross profit of 6.62B and revenue of 27.77B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.9%.
F - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ford Motor Company reported an operating income of 2.33B and revenue of 43.25B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.4%.
ET - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Energy Transfer LP reported an operating income of 2.98B and revenue of 27.77B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.7%.
F - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ford Motor Company reported a net income of 2.55B and revenue of 43.25B, resulting in a net margin of 5.9%.
ET - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Energy Transfer LP reported a net income of 1.25B and revenue of 27.77B, resulting in a net margin of 4.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
F and ET have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
F has higher volatility (18.96%) compared to ET (5.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, F dropped -97.07% vs ET's -87.81%.
F currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.29 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for F and ET
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer