PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
F vs. T
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

F vs. T - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ford Motor Company (F) and AT&T Inc. (T). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, F achieves a 8.05% return, which is significantly higher than T's -10.13% return. Over the past 10 years, F has outperformed T with an annualized return of 5.11%, while T has yielded a comparatively lower 1.81% annualized return.


F

1D
-1.07%
1M
-6.67%
6M
1.04%
YTD
8.05%
1Y
23.37%
3Y*
3.74%
5Y*
4.52%
10Y*
5.11%

T

1D
1.99%
1M
-7.39%
6M
-7.05%
YTD
-10.13%
1Y
-16.34%
3Y*
20.29%
5Y*
6.14%
10Y*
1.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

F vs. T - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
F
Ford Motor Company
8.05%42.35%-13.10%10.18%-42.18%137.48%-3.88%29.64%-34.35%8.73%
T
AT&T Inc.
-10.13%13.97%44.08%-2.74%5.76%-8.09%-21.37%45.55%-22.25%-4.01%

Correlation

The correlation between F and T is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 1984

0.29

Over the past year, the correlation between F and T has dropped to 0.01 - well below their long-term average of 0.29, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

F:

$54.28B

T:

$149.84B

EPS

F:

-$1.51

T:

$3.05

PS Ratio

F:

0.29

T:

1.23

Total Revenue (TTM)

F:

$189.86B

T:

$125.65B

Gross Profit (TTM)

F:

$17.42B

T:

$105.41B

EBITDA (TTM)

F:

$9.99B

T:

$54.70B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

F vs. T — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

F
F Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
F Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
F Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
F Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
F Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
F Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

T
T Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
T Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
T Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
T Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
T Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
T Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

F vs. T - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ford Motor Company (F) and AT&T Inc. (T). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

0.90

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.00

-0.57

+1.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.28

-1.31

+3.59

F vs. T - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current F Sharpe Ratio is 0.63, which is higher than the T Sharpe Ratio of -0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of F and T, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

F vs. T - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum F drawdown since its inception was -97.07%, which is greater than T's maximum drawdown of -64.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for F and T.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.07%

-64.15%

-32.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.39%

-28.89%

+5.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.51%

-28.89%

-7.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-58.62%

-32.01%

-26.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.77%

-42.35%

-22.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-38.88%

-24.17%

-14.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.69%

-15.73%

-28.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.26%

12.52%

-2.26%

Volatility

F vs. T - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ford Motor Company (F) is 8.33%, while AT&T Inc. (T) has a volatility of 10.00%. This indicates that F experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than T based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.33%

10.00%

-1.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.83%

19.81%

+10.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.46%

23.52%

+13.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.47%

24.36%

+15.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.48%

23.90%

+13.58%

Dividends

F vs. T - Dividend Comparison

F's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.33%, less than T's 5.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
F
Ford Motor Company
4.33%5.72%7.88%4.92%4.30%0.48%1.71%6.45%9.54%5.20%7.01%4.26%
T
AT&T Inc.
5.15%4.47%4.87%6.62%6.66%8.46%7.23%5.22%7.01%5.04%4.51%5.46%

Financials

F vs. T - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ford Motor Company and AT&T Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


30.00B35.00B40.00B45.00B50.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
43.25B
33.47B
(F) Total Revenue
(T) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


F and T have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

T has higher volatility (10.00%) compared to F (8.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, F dropped -97.07% vs T's -64.15%.

F currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.63 vs -0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for F and T

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer