PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
F vs. TM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

F vs. TM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ford Motor Company (F) and Toyota Motor Corporation (TM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, F achieves a 17.75% return, which is significantly higher than TM's -11.71% return. Over the past 10 years, F has underperformed TM with an annualized return of 7.26%, while TM has yielded a comparatively higher 8.41% annualized return.


F

1D
1.57%
1M
12.97%
6M
11.30%
YTD
17.75%
1Y
46.37%
3Y*
10.35%
5Y*
6.78%
10Y*
7.26%
ALL TIME*
5.63%

TM

1D
-1.28%
1M
8.25%
6M
-16.69%
YTD
-11.71%
1Y
6.73%
3Y*
5.69%
5Y*
3.56%
10Y*
8.41%
ALL TIME*
6.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$936.56M$781.81M$926.29M
$83.54M$83.60M$92.51M

F vs. TM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
F
Ford Motor Company
17.75%42.35%-13.10%10.18%-42.18%137.48%-3.88%29.64%-34.35%8.73%
TM
Toyota Motor Corporation
-11.71%13.82%8.88%38.23%-24.43%23.21%13.62%22.69%-5.81%12.10%

Correlation

The correlation between F and TM is 0.45, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.46

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 1999

0.39

Fundamentals

Market Cap

F:

$58.54B

TM:

$223.78B

EPS

F:

-$1.84

TM:

¥2.98K

PS Ratio

F:

0.31

TM:

0.77

PB Ratio

F:

1.64

TM:

0.99

Total Revenue (TTM)

F:

$187.97B

TM:

¥51.16T

Gross Profit (TTM)

F:

$20.25B

TM:

¥8.54T

EBITDA (TTM)

F:

-$907.00M

TM:

¥7.11T

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

F vs. TM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

F
F Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
F Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
F Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
F Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
F Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
F Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

TM
TM Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
TM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
TM Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
TM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
TM Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

F vs. TM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ford Motor Company (F) and Toyota Motor Corporation (TM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FTMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.07

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.85

0.22

+1.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.96

0.47

+3.50

F vs. TM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current F Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is higher than the TM Sharpe Ratio of 0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of F and TM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

F vs. TM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum F drawdown since its inception was -97.07%, which is greater than TM's maximum drawdown of -60.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for F and TM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.07%

-60.15%

-36.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.39%

-32.94%

+9.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.51%

-34.92%

-1.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-58.62%

-36.80%

-21.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.77%

-36.80%

-27.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-33.40%

-23.88%

-9.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.68%

-22.20%

-22.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.89%

15.34%

-4.45%

Volatility

F vs. TM - Volatility Comparison

Ford Motor Company (F) has a higher volatility of 8.28% compared to Toyota Motor Corporation (TM) at 7.49%. This indicates that F's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.28%

7.49%

+0.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.76%

20.17%

+9.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.38%

26.56%

+10.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.35%

27.16%

+12.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.42%

23.66%

+13.76%

Dividends

F vs. TM - Dividend Comparison

F's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.85%, more than TM's 1.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
F
Ford Motor Company
6.85%5.72%7.88%4.92%4.30%0.48%1.71%6.45%9.54%5.20%7.01%4.26%
TM
Toyota Motor Corporation
1.52%2.95%2.81%2.45%2.90%2.45%2.74%1.30%3.40%2.96%3.23%5.59%

Financials

F vs. TM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ford Motor Company and Toyota Motor Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

F vs. TM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Ford Motor Company and Toyota Motor Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

F - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ford Motor Company reported a gross profit of 6.08B and revenue of 48.30B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 12.6%.

TM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Toyota Motor Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.94T and revenue of 12.83T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.1%.

F - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ford Motor Company reported an operating income of 638.00M and revenue of 48.30B, resulting in an operating margin of 1.3%.

TM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Toyota Motor Corporation reported an operating income of 579.96B and revenue of 12.83T, resulting in an operating margin of 4.5%.

F - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ford Motor Company reported a net income of -1.33B and revenue of 48.30B, resulting in a net margin of -2.8%.

TM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Toyota Motor Corporation reported a net income of 832.22B and revenue of 12.83T, resulting in a net margin of 6.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


F and TM have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

F has higher volatility (8.28%) compared to TM (7.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, F dropped -97.07% vs TM's -60.15%.

F currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.16 vs 0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for F and TM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer