PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFLV vs. NOBL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

DFLV vs. NOBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF (DFLV) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

DFLV vs. NOBL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
DFLV
Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF
5.00%15.90%12.88%12.31%-0.67%
NOBL
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
2.32%6.84%6.72%8.09%-2.14%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFLV achieves a 5.00% return, which is significantly higher than NOBL's 2.32% return.


DFLV

1D
0.22%
1M
-3.41%
YTD
5.00%
6M
9.71%
1Y
19.33%
3Y*
15.35%
5Y*
10Y*

NOBL

1D
-0.04%
1M
-6.79%
YTD
2.32%
6M
4.06%
1Y
6.18%
3Y*
7.40%
5Y*
6.30%
10Y*
9.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DFLV vs. NOBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFLV has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than NOBL's 0.35% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

DFLV vs. NOBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFLV
DFLV Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
DFLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFLV Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
DFLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFLV Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

NOBL
NOBL Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
NOBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOBL Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
NOBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOBL Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFLV vs. NOBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF (DFLV) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFLVNOBLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.17

0.41

+0.76

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.67

0.70

+0.97

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.09

+0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.55

0.54

+1.02

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.85

1.89

+4.96

DFLV vs. NOBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFLV Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is higher than the NOBL Sharpe Ratio of 0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFLV and NOBL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFLVNOBLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.17

0.41

+0.76

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.96

0.64

+0.32

Correlation

The correlation between DFLV and NOBL is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

DFLV vs. NOBL - Dividend Comparison

DFLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%, less than NOBL's 2.14% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFLV
Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF
1.55%1.61%1.65%1.72%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NOBL
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
2.14%2.14%2.05%2.09%1.94%1.89%2.14%1.89%2.37%1.74%2.13%2.02%

Drawdowns

DFLV vs. NOBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFLV drawdown since its inception was -16.80%, smaller than the maximum NOBL drawdown of -35.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFLV and NOBL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


DFLVNOBLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.80%

-35.43%

+18.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.26%

-11.20%

-1.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.51%

-7.07%

+3.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.21%

-3.45%

+0.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.78%

3.18%

-0.40%

Volatility

DFLV vs. NOBL - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF (DFLV) has a higher volatility of 3.97% compared to ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) at 3.55%. This indicates that DFLV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NOBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


DFLVNOBLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.97%

3.55%

+0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.73%

8.06%

+0.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.67%

15.24%

+1.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.41%

14.39%

+0.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.41%

16.59%

-2.18%