PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFLV vs. DFLVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFLV vs. DFLVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF (DFLV) and DFA U.S. Large Cap Value Portfolio (DFLVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFLV achieves a 16.10% return, which is significantly higher than DFLVX's 14.74% return.


DFLV

1D
0.89%
1M
4.63%
YTD
16.10%
6M
19.09%
1Y
34.62%
3Y*
19.44%
5Y*
10Y*

DFLVX

1D
0.22%
1M
3.97%
YTD
14.74%
6M
17.76%
1Y
33.30%
3Y*
18.94%
5Y*
10.77%
10Y*
11.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFLV vs. DFLVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
DFLV
Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF
16.10%15.90%12.88%12.31%-0.67%
DFLVX
DFA U.S. Large Cap Value Portfolio
14.74%16.36%12.76%11.52%-0.90%

Correlation

The correlation between DFLV and DFLVX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2022

0.99

The correlation between DFLV and DFLVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFLV vs. DFLVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFLV
DFLV Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
DFLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFLV Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
DFLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFLV Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

DFLVX
DFLVX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
DFLVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFLVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFLVX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
DFLVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFLVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFLV vs. DFLVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF (DFLV) and DFA U.S. Large Cap Value Portfolio (DFLVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFLVDFLVXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.10

3.09

+0.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.31

4.37

-0.06

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.55

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

6.34

5.59

+0.76

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

22.32

20.61

+1.71

DFLV vs. DFLVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFLV Sharpe Ratio is 3.10, which is comparable to the DFLVX Sharpe Ratio of 3.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFLV and DFLVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFLVDFLVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.10

3.09

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.16

0.53

+0.63

Drawdowns

DFLV vs. DFLVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFLV drawdown since its inception was -16.80%, smaller than the maximum DFLVX drawdown of -65.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFLV and DFLVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFLVDFLVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.80%

-65.65%

+48.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.48%

-5.86%

+0.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.80%

-16.64%

-0.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.08%

-8.48%

+5.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.56%

1.59%

-0.03%

Volatility

DFLV vs. DFLVX - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF (DFLV) and DFA U.S. Large Cap Value Portfolio (DFLVX) have volatilities of 2.78% and 2.77%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFLVDFLVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.78%

2.77%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.11%

8.17%

-0.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.22%

11.00%

+0.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.22%

15.87%

-1.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.22%

18.38%

-4.16%

DFLV vs. DFLVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DFLV and DFLVX have an expense ratio of 0.22%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DFLV vs. DFLVX - Dividend Comparison

DFLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, less than DFLVX's 1.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFLV
Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF
1.40%1.61%1.65%1.72%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DFLVX
DFA U.S. Large Cap Value Portfolio
1.47%1.71%1.87%3.65%4.56%5.90%1.97%4.04%7.83%6.06%3.77%6.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, DFLV and DFLVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DFLV has higher volatility (2.78%) compared to DFLVX (2.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFLV dropped -16.80% vs DFLVX's -65.65%.

DFLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.10 vs 3.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFLV and DFLVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer