DFLV vs. VTV

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

DFLV (Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF) and VTV (Vanguard Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. DFLV is actively managed, while VTV is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DFLV returned 18.89%/yr vs 18.66%/yr for VTV. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. DFLV charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VTV.

Performance

DFLV vs. VTV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF (DFLV) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFLV achieves a 15.66% return, which is significantly higher than VTV's 14.47% return.

DFLV

• 1D: -0.95%
• 1M: 1.70%
• YTD: 15.66%
• 6M: 14.88%
• 1Y: 30.70%
• 3Y*: 18.89%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VTV

• 1D: -0.56%
• 1M: 3.10%
• YTD: 14.47%
• 6M: 13.93%
• 1Y: 27.19%
• 3Y*: 18.66%
• 5Y*: 12.22%
• 10Y*: 12.95%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFLV vs. VTV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
DFLV Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF	15.66%	15.90%	12.88%	12.31%	-0.94%
VTV Vanguard Value ETF	14.47%	15.27%	15.95%	9.32%	-0.62%

Correlation

The correlation between DFLV and VTV is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2022	0.96

The correlation between DFLV and VTV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

DFLV vs. VTV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DFLV	VTV
Financial Services	20.2%	21.5%
Technology	16.2%	16.4%
Energy	13.8%	7.4%
Healthcare	13.4%	14.1%
Industrials	13.0%	13.9%
Consumer Cyclical	7.7%	4.0%
Basic Materials	6.8%	3.0%
Consumer Defensive	4.5%	8.9%
Communication Services	4.2%	3.1%
Real Estate	0.3%	2.7%
Utilities	-	4.8%

Return for Risk

DFLV vs. VTV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFLV

DFLV Risk / Return Rank: 88
DFLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
DFLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
DFLV Omega Ratio Rank: 84
DFLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
DFLV Martin Ratio Rank: 90

VTV

VTV Risk / Return Rank: 84
VTV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
VTV Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
VTV Omega Ratio Rank: 82
VTV Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
VTV Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFLV vs. VTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF (DFLV) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DFLV	VTV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.67	2.63	+0.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.70	3.75	-0.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.47	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.63	4.30	+1.33
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.53	16.20	+3.33

DFLV vs. VTV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFLV Sharpe Ratio is 2.67, which is comparable to the VTV Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFLV and VTV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DFLV vs. VTV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFLV drawdown since its inception was -16.80%, smaller than the maximum VTV drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFLV and VTV.

Drawdown Indicators

	DFLV	VTV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.80%	-59.27%	+42.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.48%	-6.35%	+0.87%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.80%	-14.52%	-2.28%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-17.04%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-36.78%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.40%	-0.56%	-0.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.04%	-7.85%	+4.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.58%	1.68%	-0.10%

Volatility

DFLV vs. VTV - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF (DFLV) has a higher volatility of 3.79% compared to Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) at 3.41%. This indicates that DFLV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DFLV	VTV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.79%	3.41%	+0.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.42%	7.85%	+0.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.54%	10.39%	+1.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.22%	13.88%	+0.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.22%	16.65%	-2.43%

DFLV vs. VTV - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFLV has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than VTV's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

DFLV vs. VTV - Dividend Comparison

DFLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.41%, less than VTV's 1.83% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DFLV Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF	1.41%	1.61%	1.65%	1.72%	0.11%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VTV Vanguard Value ETF	1.83%	2.05%	2.31%	2.46%	2.52%	2.15%	2.56%	2.50%	2.73%	2.29%	2.44%	2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DFLV and VTV in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, DFLV and VTV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, DFLV or VTV?

DFLV has higher volatility (3.79%) compared to VTV (3.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFLV dropped -16.80% vs VTV's -59.27%.

Which ETF is better, DFLV or VTV?

On 3-year performance, DFLV leads with 18.89% vs 18.66% for VTV. On fees, VTV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VTV has been the lower-risk option at 3.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DFLV or VTV?

Over the 3-year period, DFLV has performed better with a 18.89% return vs 18.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DFLV or VTV?

VTV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for DFLV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DFLV or VTV?

VTV has the higher dividend yield at 1.83%, compared with 1.41% for DFLV.

What is the main difference between DFLV and VTV?

They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for DFLV and 0.04% for VTV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DFLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 2.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.