DFLV vs. DUHP

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

DFLV (Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF) and DUHP (DFA Dimensional US High Profitability ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DFLV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional, while DUHP is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, DFLV returned 18.89%/yr vs 17.83%/yr for DUHP. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DFLV charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.21%/yr for DUHP.

Performance

DFLV vs. DUHP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF (DFLV) and DFA Dimensional US High Profitability ETF (DUHP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFLV achieves a 15.66% return, which is significantly higher than DUHP's 7.22% return.

DFLV

• 1D: -0.95%
• 1M: 1.70%
• YTD: 15.66%
• 6M: 14.88%
• 1Y: 30.70%
• 3Y*: 18.89%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DUHP

• 1D: -1.81%
• 1M: -0.02%
• YTD: 7.22%
• 6M: 6.35%
• 1Y: 18.29%
• 3Y*: 17.83%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFLV vs. DUHP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
DFLV Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF	15.66%	15.90%	12.88%	12.31%	-0.94%
DUHP DFA Dimensional US High Profitability ETF	7.22%	13.77%	19.49%	21.11%	-2.14%

Correlation

The correlation between DFLV and DUHP is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.77
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2022	0.82

The correlation between DFLV and DUHP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

DFLV vs. DUHP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DFLV	DUHP
Financial Services	20.2%	8.8%
Technology	16.2%	36.7%
Energy	13.8%	2.1%
Healthcare	13.4%	12.9%
Industrials	13.0%	15.9%
Consumer Cyclical	7.7%	9.1%
Basic Materials	6.8%	0.6%
Consumer Defensive	4.5%	7.4%
Communication Services	4.2%	5.3%
Real Estate	0.3%	-
Utilities	-	0.9%

Return for Risk

DFLV vs. DUHP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFLV

DFLV Risk / Return Rank: 88
DFLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
DFLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
DFLV Omega Ratio Rank: 84
DFLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
DFLV Martin Ratio Rank: 90

DUHP

DUHP Risk / Return Rank: 46
DUHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
DUHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
DUHP Omega Ratio Rank: 45
DUHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
DUHP Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFLV vs. DUHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF (DFLV) and DFA Dimensional US High Profitability ETF (DUHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DFLV	DUHP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.67	1.55	+1.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.70	2.20	+1.50
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.28	+0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.63	2.04	+3.58
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.53	8.82	+10.72

DFLV vs. DUHP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFLV Sharpe Ratio is 2.67, which is higher than the DUHP Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFLV and DUHP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DFLV vs. DUHP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFLV drawdown since its inception was -16.80%, smaller than the maximum DUHP drawdown of -20.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFLV and DUHP.

Drawdown Indicators

	DFLV	DUHP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.80%	-20.05%	+3.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.48%	-8.99%	+3.51%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.80%	-17.86%	+1.06%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.40%	-2.47%	+1.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.04%	-4.00%	+0.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.58%	2.08%	-0.50%

Volatility

DFLV vs. DUHP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF (DFLV) is 3.79%, while DFA Dimensional US High Profitability ETF (DUHP) has a volatility of 4.83%. This indicates that DFLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DUHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DFLV	DUHP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.79%	4.83%	-1.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.42%	9.62%	-1.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.54%	11.87%	-0.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.22%	16.32%	-2.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.22%	16.32%	-2.10%

DFLV vs. DUHP - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFLV has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than DUHP's 0.21% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

DFLV vs. DUHP - Dividend Comparison

DFLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.41%, more than DUHP's 0.99% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
DFLV Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF	1.41%	1.61%	1.65%	1.72%	0.11%
DUHP DFA Dimensional US High Profitability ETF	0.99%	1.02%	1.13%	1.51%	1.10%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DFLV and DUHP in my portfolio?

DFLV and DUHP have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DFLV or DUHP?

DUHP has higher volatility (4.83%) compared to DFLV (3.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFLV dropped -16.80% vs DUHP's -20.05%.

Which ETF is better, DFLV or DUHP?

On 3-year performance, DFLV leads with 18.89% vs 17.83% for DUHP. On fees, DUHP is cheaper at 0.21% per year. On volatility, DFLV has been the lower-risk option at 3.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DFLV or DUHP?

Over the 3-year period, DFLV has performed better with a 18.89% return vs 17.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DFLV or DUHP?

DUHP is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for DFLV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DFLV or DUHP?

DFLV has the higher dividend yield at 1.41%, compared with 0.99% for DUHP.

What is the main difference between DFLV and DUHP?

DFLV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while DUHP is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for DFLV and 0.21% for DUHP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DFLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.