CRGY vs. EQT

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Crescent Energy Company (CRGY) and EQT Corporation (EQT).

Performance

CRGY vs. EQT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Crescent Energy Company (CRGY) and EQT Corporation (EQT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CRGY vs. EQT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CRGY Crescent Energy Company	53.28%	-39.60%	15.16%	15.58%	-1.55%	-24.61%
EQT EQT Corporation	14.30%	17.64%	21.41%	16.20%	57.64%	4.01%

Fundamentals

Market Cap CRGY : $3.12B EQT : $38.15B
EPS CRGY : $0.53 EQT : $3.30
PE Ratio CRGY : 24.18 EQT : 18.53
PS Ratio CRGY : 0.90 EQT : 4.37
PB Ratio CRGY : 0.60 EQT : 1.61
Total Revenue (TTM) CRGY : $3.58B EQT : $8.64B
Gross Profit (TTM) CRGY : $3.17B EQT : $8.42B
EBITDA (TTM) CRGY : $1.50B EQT : $5.89B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRGY achieves a 53.28% return, which is significantly higher than EQT's 14.30% return.

CRGY

• 1D: -5.70%
• 1M: 7.08%
• YTD: 53.28%
• 6M: 44.60%
• 1Y: 20.68%
• 3Y*: 8.73%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EQT

• 1D: -4.01%
• 1M: -0.89%
• YTD: 14.30%
• 6M: 9.41%
• 1Y: 14.72%
• 3Y*: 26.02%
• 5Y*: 28.03%
• 10Y*: 6.24%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CRGY vs. EQT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRGY

CRGY Risk / Return Rank: 52
CRGY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
CRGY Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
CRGY Omega Ratio Rank: 50
CRGY Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
CRGY Martin Ratio Rank: 52

EQT

EQT Risk / Return Rank: 54
EQT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
EQT Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
EQT Omega Ratio Rank: 48
EQT Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
EQT Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRGY vs. EQT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Crescent Energy Company (CRGY) and EQT Corporation (EQT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CRGY	EQT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.35	0.41	-0.06
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.85	0.76	+0.10
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.10	+0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.55	0.85	-0.31
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.04	1.68	-0.65
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CRGY vs. EQT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRGY Sharpe Ratio is 0.35, which is comparable to the EQT Sharpe Ratio of 0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRGY and EQT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CRGY	EQT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.35	0.41	-0.06
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.64	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.13	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.04	0.31	-0.35

Correlation

The correlation between CRGY and EQT is 0.49, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

CRGY vs. EQT - Dividend Comparison

CRGY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.77%, more than EQT's 1.06% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CRGY Crescent Energy Company	3.77%	5.72%	3.29%	4.01%	5.25%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EQT EQT Corporation	1.06%	1.19%	1.37%	1.57%	1.63%	0.00%	0.24%	1.10%	0.42%	0.21%	0.18%	0.23%

Drawdowns

CRGY vs. EQT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRGY drawdown since its inception was -56.21%, smaller than the maximum EQT drawdown of -91.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRGY and EQT.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRGY	EQT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.21%	-91.51%	+35.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-34.79%	-18.39%	-16.40%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-42.56%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-88.28%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-19.68%	-10.07%	-9.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-30.64%	-23.37%	-7.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	18.31%	9.31%	+9.00%

Volatility

CRGY vs. EQT - Volatility Comparison

Crescent Energy Company (CRGY) has a higher volatility of 11.11% compared to EQT Corporation (EQT) at 9.09%. This indicates that CRGY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EQT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CRGY	EQT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.11%	9.09%	+2.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	35.86%	24.01%	+11.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	59.44%	36.12%	+23.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	50.57%	43.81%	+6.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	50.57%	48.96%	+1.61%

Financials