CRGY vs. EQT
CRGY (Crescent Energy Company) and EQT (EQT Corporation) are both stocks. CRGY operates in Utilities - Diversified (Utilities), while EQT operates in Oil & Gas E&P (Energy). Over the past 3 years, CRGY returned 13.08%/yr vs 16.95%/yr for EQT. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CRGY vs. EQT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRGY achieves a 48.27% return, which is significantly higher than EQT's 3.64% return.
CRGY
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -11.54%
- YTD
- 48.27%
- 6M
- 27.32%
- 1Y
- 45.38%
- 3Y*
- 13.08%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EQT
- 1D
- 1.41%
- 1M
- -5.66%
- YTD
- 3.64%
- 6M
- -7.52%
- 1Y
- 0.71%
- 3Y*
- 16.95%
- 5Y*
- 22.48%
- 10Y*
- 4.11%
CRGY vs. EQT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRGY Crescent Energy Company | 48.27% | -39.60% | 15.16% | 15.58% | -1.55% | -24.61% |
EQT EQT Corporation | 3.64% | 17.64% | 21.41% | 16.20% | 57.64% | 4.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRGY and EQT is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2021 | 0.48 |
The correlation between CRGY and EQT shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (1 year) to 0.48 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CRGY:
$4.00B
EQT:
$34.53B
CRGY:
-$0.98
EQT:
$5.40
CRGY:
0.93
EQT:
3.41
CRGY:
0.85
EQT:
1.37
CRGY:
$3.81B
EQT:
$10.03B
CRGY:
$2.68B
EQT:
$6.43B
CRGY:
$1.21B
EQT:
$7.48B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRGY vs. EQT — Risk / Return Rank
CRGY
EQT
CRGY vs. EQT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Crescent Energy Company (CRGY) and EQT Corporation (EQT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CRGY | EQT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.03 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.04 | 0.04 | +2.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.62 | 0.07 | +4.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CRGY | EQT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 | 0.02 | +0.89 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.53 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.08 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.05 | 0.30 | -0.36 |
Drawdowns
CRGY vs. EQT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRGY drawdown since its inception was -56.21%, smaller than the maximum EQT drawdown of -91.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRGY and EQT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRGY | EQT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.21% | -91.51% | +35.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.34% | -19.59% | -2.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -55.95% | -31.62% | -24.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -42.56% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -88.28% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.31% | -18.45% | -3.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.20% | -23.34% | -6.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.86% | 10.94% | -1.08% |
Volatility
CRGY vs. EQT - Volatility Comparison
Crescent Energy Company (CRGY) has a higher volatility of 14.47% compared to EQT Corporation (EQT) at 7.87%. This indicates that CRGY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EQT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRGY | EQT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.47% | 7.87% | +6.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.78% | 21.57% | +13.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.29% | 32.57% | +17.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.48% | 42.80% | +7.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.48% | 48.91% | +1.57% |
Dividends
CRGY vs. EQT - Dividend Comparison
CRGY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.93%, more than EQT's 1.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRGY Crescent Energy Company | 3.93% | 5.72% | 3.29% | 4.01% | 5.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EQT EQT Corporation | 1.18% | 1.19% | 1.37% | 1.57% | 1.63% | 0.00% | 0.24% | 1.10% | 0.42% | 0.21% | 0.18% | 0.23% |
Financials
CRGY vs. EQT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Crescent Energy Company and EQT Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CRGY vs. EQT - Profitability Comparison
CRGY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Crescent Energy Company reported a gross profit of 1.08B and revenue of 1.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 91.4%.
EQT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EQT Corporation reported a gross profit of 3.32B and revenue of 3.38B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 98.4%.
CRGY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Crescent Energy Company reported an operating income of 327.49M and revenue of 1.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.7%.
EQT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EQT Corporation reported an operating income of 2.04B and revenue of 3.38B, resulting in an operating margin of 60.3%.
CRGY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Crescent Energy Company reported a net income of -419.85M and revenue of 1.18B, resulting in a net margin of -35.5%.
EQT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EQT Corporation reported a net income of 1.55B and revenue of 3.38B, resulting in a net margin of 46.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CRGY and EQT have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CRGY has higher volatility (14.47%) compared to EQT (7.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRGY dropped -56.21% vs EQT's -91.51%.
CRGY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.91 vs 0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CRGY and EQT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer