PortfoliosLab logo
EQT vs. LNG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between EQT and LNG is 0.40, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

EQT vs. LNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in EQT Corporation (EQT) and Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

EQT:

0.97

LNG:

1.86

Sortino Ratio

EQT:

1.42

LNG:

2.28

Omega Ratio

EQT:

1.20

LNG:

1.33

Calmar Ratio

EQT:

0.78

LNG:

2.41

Martin Ratio

EQT:

3.36

LNG:

7.36

Ulcer Index

EQT:

10.63%

LNG:

7.22%

Daily Std Dev

EQT:

37.26%

LNG:

29.16%

Max Drawdown

EQT:

-91.50%

LNG:

-97.84%

Current Drawdown

EQT:

-2.53%

LNG:

-6.16%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

EQT:

$33.15B

LNG:

$52.56B

EPS

EQT:

$0.61

LNG:

$13.94

PE Ratio

EQT:

90.38

LNG:

17.00

PEG Ratio

EQT:

0.54

LNG:

2.34

PS Ratio

EQT:

5.38

LNG:

3.14

PB Ratio

EQT:

1.59

LNG:

9.42

Total Revenue (TTM)

EQT:

$6.34B

LNG:

$16.89B

Gross Profit (TTM)

EQT:

$3.11B

LNG:

$9.22B

EBITDA (TTM)

EQT:

$3.35B

LNG:

$7.31B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EQT achieves a 20.27% return, which is significantly higher than LNG's 10.78% return. Over the past 10 years, EQT has underperformed LNG with an annualized return of 2.57%, while LNG has yielded a comparatively higher 12.78% annualized return.


EQT

YTD

20.27%

1M

9.80%

6M

22.04%

1Y

36.23%

3Y*

6.60%

5Y*

34.32%

10Y*

2.57%

LNG

YTD

10.78%

1M

3.04%

6M

6.26%

1Y

51.60%

3Y*

21.30%

5Y*

40.88%

10Y*

12.78%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EQT Corporation

Cheniere Energy, Inc.

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

EQT vs. LNG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EQT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of EQT is 7878
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of EQT is 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of EQT is 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of EQT is 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of EQT is 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of EQT is 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

LNG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LNG is 9191
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LNG is 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LNG is 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LNG is 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LNG is 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LNG is 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

EQT vs. LNG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EQT Corporation (EQT) and Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current EQT Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is lower than the LNG Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EQT and LNG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

EQT vs. LNG - Dividend Comparison

EQT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, more than LNG's 0.82% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
EQT
EQT Corporation
1.14%1.37%1.57%1.63%0.00%0.24%1.10%83.99%0.24%0.21%0.26%0.18%
LNG
Cheniere Energy, Inc.
0.82%0.84%0.95%0.92%0.33%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

EQT vs. LNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EQT drawdown since its inception was -91.50%, smaller than the maximum LNG drawdown of -97.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQT and LNG.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

EQT vs. LNG - Volatility Comparison

EQT Corporation (EQT) has a higher volatility of 7.82% compared to Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) at 5.16%. This indicates that EQT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

EQT vs. LNG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between EQT Corporation and Cheniere Energy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B20212022202320242025
2.42B
5.44B
(EQT) Total Revenue
(LNG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

EQT vs. LNG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between EQT Corporation and Cheniere Energy, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-50.0%0.0%50.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
70.7%
34.4%
(EQT) Gross Margin
(LNG) Gross Margin
EQT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, EQT Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.71B and revenue of 2.42B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 70.7%.

LNG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.87B and revenue of 5.44B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.4%.

EQT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, EQT Corporation reported an operating income of 496.25M and revenue of 2.42B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.5%.

LNG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of 961.00M and revenue of 5.44B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.7%.

EQT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, EQT Corporation reported a net income of 242.14M and revenue of 2.42B, resulting in a net margin of 10.0%.

LNG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported a net income of 353.00M and revenue of 5.44B, resulting in a net margin of 6.5%.