PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
EQT vs. LNG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


EQTLNG
YTD Return8.56%21.73%
1Y Return6.50%21.76%
3Y Return (Ann)28.86%25.71%
5Y Return (Ann)30.42%28.12%
10Y Return (Ann)-1.72%11.34%
Sharpe Ratio0.161.15
Sortino Ratio0.481.73
Omega Ratio1.061.21
Calmar Ratio0.111.39
Martin Ratio0.402.50
Ulcer Index13.02%8.83%
Daily Std Dev31.76%19.23%
Max Drawdown-91.57%-97.84%
Current Drawdown-26.26%0.00%

Fundamentals


EQTLNG
Market Cap$24.60B$45.32B
EPS$0.76$16.06
PE Ratio54.2412.58
PEG Ratio0.200.60
Total Revenue (TTM)$4.79B$16.09B
Gross Profit (TTM)$703.36M$9.35B
EBITDA (TTM)$1.75B$7.44B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between EQT and LNG is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

EQT vs. LNG - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, EQT achieves a 8.56% return, which is significantly lower than LNG's 21.73% return. Over the past 10 years, EQT has underperformed LNG with an annualized return of -1.72%, while LNG has yielded a comparatively higher 11.34% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
4.58%
33.57%
EQT
LNG

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

EQT vs. LNG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EQT Corporation (EQT) and Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EQT
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for EQT, currently valued at 0.16, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.16
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for EQT, currently valued at 0.48, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.48
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for EQT, currently valued at 1.06, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.06
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for EQT, currently valued at 0.11, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.11
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for EQT, currently valued at 0.40, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.000.40
LNG
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LNG, currently valued at 1.15, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.15
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for LNG, currently valued at 1.73, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.73
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for LNG, currently valued at 1.21, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.21
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for LNG, currently valued at 1.39, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.39
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for LNG, currently valued at 2.50, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.002.50

EQT vs. LNG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EQT Sharpe Ratio is 0.16, which is lower than the LNG Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EQT and LNG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.16
1.15
EQT
LNG

Dividends

EQT vs. LNG - Dividend Comparison

EQT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%, more than LNG's 0.88% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
EQT
EQT Corporation
1.55%1.58%1.66%0.00%0.24%1.10%83.74%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LNG
Cheniere Energy, Inc.
0.88%0.95%0.92%0.33%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

EQT vs. LNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EQT drawdown since its inception was -91.57%, smaller than the maximum LNG drawdown of -97.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQT and LNG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-26.26%
0
EQT
LNG

Volatility

EQT vs. LNG - Volatility Comparison

EQT Corporation (EQT) has a higher volatility of 11.84% compared to Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) at 8.12%. This indicates that EQT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
11.84%
8.12%
EQT
LNG

Financials

EQT vs. LNG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between EQT Corporation and Cheniere Energy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items