EQT vs. LNG

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about EQT Corporation (EQT) and Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG).

Performance

EQT vs. LNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in EQT Corporation (EQT) and Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

EQT vs. LNG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EQT EQT Corporation	14.30%	17.64%	21.41%	16.20%	57.64%	71.60%	17.27%	-41.82%	-38.82%	-12.80%
LNG Cheniere Energy, Inc.	42.28%	-8.70%	27.18%	15.02%	49.30%	69.48%	-1.70%	3.18%	9.94%	29.95%

Fundamentals

Market Cap EQT : $38.15B LNG : $59.28B
EPS EQT : $3.30 LNG : $24.33
PE Ratio EQT : 18.53 LNG : 11.34
PEG Ratio EQT : 0.12 LNG : 0.06
PS Ratio EQT : 4.37 LNG : 3.02
PB Ratio EQT : 1.61 LNG : 7.49
Total Revenue (TTM) EQT : $8.64B LNG : $19.98B
Gross Profit (TTM) EQT : $8.42B LNG : $5.46B
EBITDA (TTM) EQT : $5.89B LNG : $9.75B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EQT achieves a 14.30% return, which is significantly lower than LNG's 42.28% return. Over the past 10 years, EQT has underperformed LNG with an annualized return of 6.24%, while LNG has yielded a comparatively higher 23.93% annualized return.

EQT

• 1D: -4.01%
• 1M: -0.89%
• YTD: 14.30%
• 6M: 9.41%
• 1Y: 14.72%
• 3Y*: 26.02%
• 5Y*: 28.03%
• 10Y*: 6.24%

LNG

• 1D: -2.79%
• 1M: 10.81%
• YTD: 42.28%
• 6M: 19.47%
• 1Y: 20.58%
• 3Y*: 21.72%
• 5Y*: 32.08%
• 10Y*: 23.93%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

EQT vs. LNG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EQT

EQT Risk / Return Rank: 54
EQT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
EQT Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
EQT Omega Ratio Rank: 48
EQT Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
EQT Martin Ratio Rank: 57

LNG

LNG Risk / Return Rank: 61
LNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
LNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
LNG Omega Ratio Rank: 58
LNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
LNG Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EQT vs. LNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EQT Corporation (EQT) and Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EQT	LNG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.41	0.70	-0.29
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.76	1.11	-0.36
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.15	-0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.85	0.91	-0.06
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.68	2.08	-0.39
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EQT vs. LNG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EQT Sharpe Ratio is 0.41, which is lower than the LNG Sharpe Ratio of 0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EQT and LNG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EQT	LNG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41	0.70	-0.29
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.64	1.08	-0.44
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.13	0.73	-0.60
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.31	0.17	+0.14

Correlation

The correlation between EQT and LNG is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

EQT vs. LNG - Dividend Comparison

EQT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, more than LNG's 0.76% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EQT EQT Corporation	1.06%	1.19%	1.37%	1.57%	1.63%	0.00%	0.24%	1.10%	0.42%	0.21%	0.18%	0.23%
LNG Cheniere Energy, Inc.	0.76%	1.06%	0.84%	0.95%	0.92%	0.33%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

EQT vs. LNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EQT drawdown since its inception was -91.51%, smaller than the maximum LNG drawdown of -97.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQT and LNG.

Drawdown Indicators

	EQT	LNG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-91.51%	-97.84%	+6.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.39%	-22.34%	+3.95%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-42.56%	-24.87%	-17.69%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-88.28%	-57.53%	-30.75%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.07%	-7.10%	-2.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.37%	-43.34%	+19.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.31%	9.79%	-0.48%

Volatility

EQT vs. LNG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for EQT Corporation (EQT) is 9.09%, while Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) has a volatility of 11.79%. This indicates that EQT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EQT	LNG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.09%	11.79%	-2.70%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.01%	18.41%	+5.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	36.12%	29.65%	+6.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	43.81%	29.90%	+13.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	48.96%	32.96%	+16.00%

Financials