CRGY vs. AES

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Crescent Energy Company (CRGY) and The AES Corporation (AES).

Performance

CRGY vs. AES - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Crescent Energy Company (CRGY) and The AES Corporation (AES). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CRGY vs. AES - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CRGY Crescent Energy Company	53.28%	-39.60%	15.16%	15.58%	-1.55%	-24.61%
AES The AES Corporation	0.20%	18.26%	-30.40%	-30.88%	21.69%	-2.33%

Fundamentals

EPS CRGY : $0.53 AES : $1.91
PE Ratio CRGY : 24.18 AES : 7.42
PS Ratio CRGY : 0.90 AES : 0.45
Total Revenue (TTM) CRGY : $3.58B AES : $15.16B
Gross Profit (TTM) CRGY : $3.17B AES : $5.45B
EBITDA (TTM) CRGY : $1.50B AES : $4.56B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRGY achieves a 53.28% return, which is significantly higher than AES's 0.20% return.

CRGY

• 1D: -5.70%
• 1M: 7.08%
• YTD: 53.28%
• 6M: 44.60%
• 1Y: 20.68%
• 3Y*: 8.73%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AES

• 1D: 0.78%
• 1M: -0.07%
• YTD: 0.20%
• 6M: -5.33%
• 1Y: 21.36%
• 3Y*: -12.21%
• 5Y*: -8.72%
• 10Y*: 5.95%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CRGY vs. AES — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRGY

CRGY Risk / Return Rank: 52
CRGY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
CRGY Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
CRGY Omega Ratio Rank: 50
CRGY Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
CRGY Martin Ratio Rank: 52

AES

AES Risk / Return Rank: 57
AES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
AES Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
AES Omega Ratio Rank: 56
AES Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
AES Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRGY vs. AES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Crescent Energy Company (CRGY) and The AES Corporation (AES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CRGY	AES	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.35	0.43	-0.08
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.85	0.96	-0.11
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.14	-0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.55	0.90	-0.35
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.04	1.95	-0.91
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CRGY vs. AES - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRGY Sharpe Ratio is 0.35, which is comparable to the AES Sharpe Ratio of 0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRGY and AES, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CRGY	AES	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.35	0.43	-0.08
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.23	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.17	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.04	0.13	-0.17

Correlation

The correlation between CRGY and AES is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CRGY vs. AES - Dividend Comparison

CRGY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.77%, less than AES's 4.96% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CRGY Crescent Energy Company	3.77%	5.72%	3.29%	4.01%	5.25%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
AES The AES Corporation	4.96%	4.91%	5.36%	3.45%	2.20%	2.48%	2.44%	2.74%	3.60%	4.43%	3.79%	4.18%

Drawdowns

CRGY vs. AES - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRGY drawdown since its inception was -56.21%, smaller than the maximum AES drawdown of -98.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRGY and AES.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRGY	AES	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.21%	-98.65%	+42.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-34.79%	-23.27%	-11.52%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-63.43%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-63.43%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-19.68%	-63.77%	+44.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-30.64%	-56.99%	+26.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	18.31%	10.72%	+7.59%

Volatility

CRGY vs. AES - Volatility Comparison

Crescent Energy Company (CRGY) has a higher volatility of 11.11% compared to The AES Corporation (AES) at 1.73%. This indicates that CRGY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CRGY	AES	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.11%	1.73%	+9.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	35.86%	32.77%	+3.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	59.44%	49.97%	+9.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	50.57%	38.05%	+12.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	50.57%	36.17%	+14.40%

Financials