EQT vs. EXE

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about EQT Corporation (EQT) and Expand Energy Corp (EXE).

Performance

EQT vs. EXE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in EQT Corporation (EQT) and Expand Energy Corp (EXE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

EQT vs. EXE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
EQT EQT Corporation	19.07%	17.64%	21.41%	16.20%	57.64%	30.05%
EXE Expand Energy Corp	0.02%	14.35%	33.18%	-14.77%	62.34%	46.39%

Fundamentals

Market Cap EQT : $39.75B EXE : $26.38M
EPS EQT : $3.30 EXE : $11.34
PE Ratio EQT : 19.30 EXE : 9.68
PS Ratio EQT : 4.55 EXE : 1.45
PB Ratio EQT : 1.67 EXE : 0.00
Total Revenue (TTM) EQT : $8.64B EXE : $12.12B
Gross Profit (TTM) EQT : $8.42B EXE : $9.75B
EBITDA (TTM) EQT : $5.89B EXE : $5.38B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EQT achieves a 19.07% return, which is significantly higher than EXE's 0.02% return.

EQT

• 1D: -1.24%
• 1M: 3.61%
• YTD: 19.07%
• 6M: 17.60%
• 1Y: 20.52%
• 3Y*: 27.75%
• 5Y*: 29.08%
• 10Y*: 6.68%

EXE

• 1D: -1.50%
• 1M: 2.28%
• YTD: 0.02%
• 6M: 4.40%
• 1Y: 1.69%
• 3Y*: 16.63%
• 5Y*: 25.31%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

EQT vs. EXE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EQT

EQT Risk / Return Rank: 61
EQT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
EQT Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
EQT Omega Ratio Rank: 56
EQT Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
EQT Martin Ratio Rank: 64

EXE

EXE Risk / Return Rank: 41
EXE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
EXE Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
EXE Omega Ratio Rank: 37
EXE Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
EXE Martin Ratio Rank: 44

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EQT vs. EXE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EQT Corporation (EQT) and Expand Energy Corp (EXE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EQT	EXE	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.57	0.05	+0.52
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.95	0.30	+0.65
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	1.04	+0.09
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.17	0.09	+1.08
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.31	0.16	+2.15
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EQT vs. EXE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EQT Sharpe Ratio is 0.57, which is higher than the EXE Sharpe Ratio of 0.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EQT and EXE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EQT	EXE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.57	0.05	+0.52
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.67	0.73	-0.06
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.14	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.32	0.70	-0.39

Correlation

The correlation between EQT and EXE is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

EQT vs. EXE - Dividend Comparison

EQT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than EXE's 2.91% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EQT EQT Corporation	1.01%	1.19%	1.37%	1.57%	1.63%	0.00%	0.24%	1.10%	0.42%	0.21%	0.18%	0.23%
EXE Expand Energy Corp	2.91%	2.89%	2.45%	4.70%	10.16%	1.74%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

EQT vs. EXE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EQT drawdown since its inception was -91.51%, which is greater than EXE's maximum drawdown of -29.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQT and EXE.

Drawdown Indicators

	EQT	EXE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-91.51%	-29.69%	-61.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.39%	-22.90%	+4.51%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-42.56%	-29.69%	-12.87%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-88.28%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.32%	-10.18%	+3.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.38%	-10.60%	-12.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.29%	12.54%	-3.25%

Volatility

EQT vs. EXE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for EQT Corporation (EQT) is 8.04%, while Expand Energy Corp (EXE) has a volatility of 8.76%. This indicates that EQT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EXE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EQT	EXE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.04%	8.76%	-0.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.63%	24.93%	-1.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	35.89%	33.58%	+2.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	43.78%	35.10%	+8.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	48.95%	35.03%	+13.92%

Financials