CRGY vs. MPC

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CRGY (Crescent Energy Company) and MPC (Marathon Petroleum Corporation) are both stocks. CRGY operates in Utilities - Diversified (Utilities), while MPC operates in Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing (Energy). Over the past 3 years, CRGY returned 11.93%/yr vs 37.67%/yr for MPC. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

CRGY vs. MPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Crescent Energy Company (CRGY) and Marathon Petroleum Corporation (MPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRGY achieves a 48.27% return, which is significantly lower than MPC's 65.76% return.

CRGY

• 1D: 1.75%
• 1M: -10.19%
• YTD: 48.27%
• 6M: 28.24%
• 1Y: 40.42%
• 3Y*: 11.93%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MPC

• 1D: 1.58%
• 1M: 6.21%
• YTD: 65.76%
• 6M: 42.31%
• 1Y: 68.20%
• 3Y*: 37.67%
• 5Y*: 36.42%
• 10Y*: 26.16%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRGY vs. MPC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CRGY Crescent Energy Company	48.27%	-39.60%	15.16%	15.58%	-1.55%	-24.61%
MPC Marathon Petroleum Corporation	65.76%	19.17%	-4.06%	30.46%	86.62%	-0.11%

Correlation

The correlation between CRGY and MPC is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.52
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.47
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2021	0.51

The correlation between CRGY and MPC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap CRGY : $4.00B MPC : $78.83B
EPS CRGY : -$0.98 MPC : $15.35
PS Ratio CRGY : 0.93 MPC : 0.59
PB Ratio CRGY : 0.85 MPC : 4.71
Total Revenue (TTM) CRGY : $3.81B MPC : $135.75B
Gross Profit (TTM) CRGY : $2.68B MPC : $11.95B
EBITDA (TTM) CRGY : $1.21B MPC : $12.39B

Return for Risk

CRGY vs. MPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRGY

CRGY Risk / Return Rank: 66
CRGY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
CRGY Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
CRGY Omega Ratio Rank: 59
CRGY Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
CRGY Martin Ratio Rank: 72

MPC

MPC Risk / Return Rank: 86
MPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
MPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
MPC Omega Ratio Rank: 85
MPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
MPC Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRGY vs. MPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Crescent Energy Company (CRGY) and Marathon Petroleum Corporation (MPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CRGY	MPC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.81	2.18	-1.37
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.33	2.73	-1.40
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.36	-0.20
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.82	3.74	-1.92
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.12	9.89	-5.76
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CRGY vs. MPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRGY Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is lower than the MPC Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRGY and MPC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CRGY	MPC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81	2.18	-1.37
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.11	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.65	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.05	0.56	-0.62

Drawdowns

CRGY vs. MPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRGY drawdown since its inception was -56.21%, smaller than the maximum MPC drawdown of -79.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRGY and MPC.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRGY	MPC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.21%	-79.67%	+23.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-22.34%	-18.33%	-4.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-55.95%	-44.75%	-11.20%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-44.75%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-79.67%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-22.31%	0.00%	-22.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-30.20%	-17.36%	-12.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.84%	6.93%	+2.91%

Volatility

CRGY vs. MPC - Volatility Comparison

Crescent Energy Company (CRGY) has a higher volatility of 14.61% compared to Marathon Petroleum Corporation (MPC) at 11.31%. This indicates that CRGY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CRGY	MPC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.61%	11.31%	+3.30%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	34.78%	25.81%	+8.97%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	50.62%	31.50%	+19.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	50.50%	33.04%	+17.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	50.50%	40.26%	+10.24%

Dividends

CRGY vs. MPC - Dividend Comparison

CRGY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.93%, more than MPC's 1.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CRGY Crescent Energy Company	3.93%	5.72%	3.29%	4.01%	5.25%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MPC Marathon Petroleum Corporation	1.46%	2.29%	2.43%	2.07%	2.14%	3.63%	5.61%	3.52%	3.12%	2.30%	2.70%	2.20%

Financials

CRGY vs. MPC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Crescent Energy Company and Marathon Petroleum Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

CRGY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Crescent Energy Company reported a gross profit of 1.08B and revenue of 1.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 91.4%.

MPC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Marathon Petroleum Corporation reported a gross profit of 3.31B and revenue of 34.57B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 9.6%.

CRGY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Crescent Energy Company reported an operating income of 327.49M and revenue of 1.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.7%.

MPC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Marathon Petroleum Corporation reported an operating income of 1.40B and revenue of 34.57B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.1%.

CRGY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Crescent Energy Company reported a net income of -419.85M and revenue of 1.18B, resulting in a net margin of -35.5%.

MPC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Marathon Petroleum Corporation reported a net income of 511.00M and revenue of 34.57B, resulting in a net margin of 1.5%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CRGY and MPC in my portfolio?

CRGY and MPC have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CRGY or MPC?

CRGY has higher volatility (14.61%) compared to MPC (11.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRGY dropped -56.21% vs MPC's -79.67%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MPC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.