CRGY vs. ACVA
CRGY (Crescent Energy Company) and ACVA (ACV Auctions Inc.) are both stocks. CRGY operates in Utilities - Diversified (Utilities), while ACVA operates in Software - Application (Technology). Over the past 3 years, CRGY returned 6.43%/yr vs -28.15%/yr for ACVA. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CRGY vs. ACVA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRGY achieves a 27.85% return, which is significantly higher than ACVA's -20.57% return.
CRGY
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- -20.30%
- YTD
- 27.85%
- 6M
- 30.18%
- 1Y
- 16.22%
- 3Y*
- 6.43%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ACVA
- 1D
- -1.70%
- 1M
- 7.06%
- YTD
- -20.57%
- 6M
- -22.41%
- 1Y
- -59.30%
- 3Y*
- -28.15%
- 5Y*
- -23.27%
- 10Y*
- —
CRGY vs. ACVA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRGY Crescent Energy Company | 27.85% | -39.60% | 15.16% | 15.58% | -1.55% | -16.03% |
ACVA ACV Auctions Inc. | -20.57% | -62.87% | 42.57% | 84.53% | -56.42% | -4.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRGY and ACVA is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2021 | 0.21 |
The correlation between CRGY and ACVA shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (1 year) to 0.22 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CRGY:
$3.45B
ACVA:
$1.10B
CRGY:
-$0.98
ACVA:
-$0.36
CRGY:
0.81
ACVA:
1.40
CRGY:
0.74
ACVA:
2.56
CRGY:
$3.81B
ACVA:
$781.10M
CRGY:
$2.68B
ACVA:
$496.54M
CRGY:
$1.21B
ACVA:
-$10.72M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRGY vs. ACVA — Risk / Return Rank
CRGY
ACVA
CRGY vs. ACVA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Crescent Energy Company (CRGY) and ACV Auctions Inc. (ACVA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CRGY | ACVA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 0.84 | +0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.67 | -0.79 | +1.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.58 | -1.13 | +2.71 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CRGY vs. ACVA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRGY drawdown since its inception was -56.21%, smaller than the maximum ACVA drawdown of -88.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRGY and ACVA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRGY | ACVA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.21% | -88.80% | +32.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.30% | -75.05% | +50.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -55.95% | -82.09% | +26.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -83.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.01% | -82.80% | +49.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.16% | -60.08% | +29.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.39% | 52.62% | -42.23% |
Volatility
CRGY vs. ACVA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Crescent Energy Company (CRGY) is 13.20%, while ACV Auctions Inc. (ACVA) has a volatility of 18.69%. This indicates that CRGY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACVA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRGY | ACVA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.20% | 18.69% | -5.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.35% | 49.62% | -15.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.78% | 73.09% | -22.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.69% | 60.91% | -10.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.69% | 60.54% | -9.85% |
Dividends
CRGY vs. ACVA - Dividend Comparison
CRGY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.56%, while ACVA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACVA ACV Auctions Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CRGY Crescent Energy Company | 4.56% | 5.72% | 3.29% | 4.01% | 5.25% |
Financials
CRGY vs. ACVA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Crescent Energy Company and ACV Auctions Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CRGY vs. ACVA - Profitability Comparison
CRGY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Crescent Energy Company reported a gross profit of 1.08B and revenue of 1.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 91.4%.
ACVA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ACV Auctions Inc. reported a gross profit of 124.37M and revenue of 204.19M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.9%.
CRGY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Crescent Energy Company reported an operating income of 327.49M and revenue of 1.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.7%.
ACVA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ACV Auctions Inc. reported an operating income of -9.24M and revenue of 204.19M, resulting in an operating margin of -4.5%.
CRGY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Crescent Energy Company reported a net income of -419.85M and revenue of 1.18B, resulting in a net margin of -35.5%.
ACVA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ACV Auctions Inc. reported a net income of -10.89M and revenue of 204.19M, resulting in a net margin of -5.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CRGY and ACVA have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ACVA has higher volatility (18.69%) compared to CRGY (13.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRGY dropped -56.21% vs ACVA's -88.80%.
CRGY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.32 vs -0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CRGY and ACVA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer