EQT vs. AR
EQT (EQT Corporation) and AR (Antero Resources Corporation) are both stocks. Both operate in the Oil & Gas E&P industry within the Energy sector. Over the past 10 years, EQT returned 2.91%/yr vs 1.99%/yr for AR. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
EQT vs. AR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EQT achieves a -4.07% return, which is significantly lower than AR's -1.63% return. Over the past 10 years, EQT has outperformed AR with an annualized return of 2.91%, while AR has yielded a comparatively lower 1.99% annualized return.
EQT
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- -11.00%
- YTD
- -4.07%
- 6M
- -5.41%
- 1Y
- -12.13%
- 3Y*
- 10.41%
- 5Y*
- 23.13%
- 10Y*
- 2.91%
AR
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- -11.63%
- YTD
- -1.63%
- 6M
- -1.19%
- 1Y
- -20.27%
- 3Y*
- 14.71%
- 5Y*
- 20.74%
- 10Y*
- 1.99%
EQT vs. AR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQT EQT Corporation | -4.07% | 17.64% | 21.41% | 16.20% | 57.64% | 71.60% | 17.27% | -41.82% | -38.82% | -12.80% |
AR Antero Resources Corporation | -1.63% | -1.68% | 54.54% | -26.82% | 77.09% | 221.10% | 91.23% | -69.65% | -50.58% | -19.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between EQT and AR is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2013 | 0.70 |
The correlation between EQT and AR shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (all time) to 0.80 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
EQT:
$31.96B
AR:
$10.56B
EQT:
$5.40
AR:
$3.08
EQT:
9.46
AR:
11.00
EQT:
0.08
AR:
0.04
EQT:
3.16
AR:
1.84
EQT:
1.27
AR:
1.31
EQT:
$10.03B
AR:
$5.76B
EQT:
$6.43B
AR:
$2.60B
EQT:
$7.48B
AR:
$1.82B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EQT vs. AR — Risk / Return Rank
EQT
AR
EQT vs. AR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EQT Corporation (EQT) and Antero Resources Corporation (AR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EQT | AR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 0.94 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.49 | -0.64 | +0.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.03 | -0.97 | -0.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EQT vs. AR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EQT drawdown since its inception was -91.51%, smaller than the maximum AR drawdown of -99.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQT and AR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EQT | AR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.51% | -99.01% | +7.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.08% | -31.77% | +6.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.62% | -33.19% | +1.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.56% | -58.39% | +15.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -88.28% | -97.67% | +9.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.52% | -49.71% | +25.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.34% | -61.31% | +37.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.78% | 20.99% | -9.21% |
Volatility
EQT vs. AR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for EQT Corporation (EQT) is 8.16%, while Antero Resources Corporation (AR) has a volatility of 9.88%. This indicates that EQT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EQT | AR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.16% | 9.88% | -1.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.13% | 27.29% | -6.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.36% | 38.74% | -6.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.74% | 48.17% | -5.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.91% | 60.71% | -11.80% |
Dividends
EQT vs. AR - Dividend Comparison
EQT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, while AR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AR Antero Resources Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EQT EQT Corporation | 1.28% | 1.19% | 1.37% | 1.57% | 1.63% | 0.00% | 0.24% | 1.10% | 0.42% | 0.21% | 0.18% | 0.23% |
Financials
EQT vs. AR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between EQT Corporation and Antero Resources Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
EQT vs. AR - Profitability Comparison
EQT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EQT Corporation reported a gross profit of 3.32B and revenue of 3.38B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 98.4%.
AR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Antero Resources Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.82B and revenue of 1.95B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 93.6%.
EQT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EQT Corporation reported an operating income of 2.04B and revenue of 3.38B, resulting in an operating margin of 60.3%.
AR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Antero Resources Corporation reported an operating income of 729.45M and revenue of 1.95B, resulting in an operating margin of 37.5%.
EQT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EQT Corporation reported a net income of 1.55B and revenue of 3.38B, resulting in a net margin of 46.0%.
AR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Antero Resources Corporation reported a net income of 535.22M and revenue of 1.95B, resulting in a net margin of 27.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
EQT and AR have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AR has higher volatility (9.88%) compared to EQT (8.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EQT dropped -91.51% vs AR's -99.01%.
EQT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.38 vs -0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EQT and AR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer