PortfoliosLab logo
EQT vs. CRK
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between EQT and CRK is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

EQT vs. CRK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in EQT Corporation (EQT) and Comstock Resources, Inc. (CRK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

EQT:

0.97

CRK:

1.79

Sortino Ratio

EQT:

1.42

CRK:

2.39

Omega Ratio

EQT:

1.20

CRK:

1.31

Calmar Ratio

EQT:

0.78

CRK:

1.10

Martin Ratio

EQT:

3.36

CRK:

9.47

Ulcer Index

EQT:

10.63%

CRK:

11.34%

Daily Std Dev

EQT:

37.26%

CRK:

57.13%

Max Drawdown

EQT:

-91.50%

CRK:

-99.32%

Current Drawdown

EQT:

-2.53%

CRK:

-94.00%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

EQT:

$33.15B

CRK:

$6.88B

EPS

EQT:

$0.61

CRK:

-$1.13

PEG Ratio

EQT:

0.54

CRK:

-0.04

PS Ratio

EQT:

5.38

CRK:

4.80

PB Ratio

EQT:

1.59

CRK:

3.22

Total Revenue (TTM)

EQT:

$6.34B

CRK:

$1.43B

Gross Profit (TTM)

EQT:

$3.11B

CRK:

$340.30M

EBITDA (TTM)

EQT:

$3.35B

CRK:

$275.09M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EQT achieves a 20.27% return, which is significantly lower than CRK's 27.88% return. Over the past 10 years, EQT has underperformed CRK with an annualized return of 2.57%, while CRK has yielded a comparatively higher 2.80% annualized return.


EQT

YTD

20.27%

1M

9.80%

6M

22.04%

1Y

36.23%

3Y*

6.60%

5Y*

34.32%

10Y*

2.57%

CRK

YTD

27.88%

1M

23.48%

6M

49.65%

1Y

98.98%

3Y*

8.39%

5Y*

35.61%

10Y*

2.80%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EQT Corporation

Comstock Resources, Inc.

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

EQT vs. CRK — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EQT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of EQT is 7878
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of EQT is 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of EQT is 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of EQT is 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of EQT is 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of EQT is 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

CRK
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CRK is 9090
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CRK is 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CRK is 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CRK is 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CRK is 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CRK is 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

EQT vs. CRK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EQT Corporation (EQT) and Comstock Resources, Inc. (CRK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current EQT Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is lower than the CRK Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EQT and CRK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

EQT vs. CRK - Dividend Comparison

EQT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, while CRK has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
EQT
EQT Corporation
1.14%1.37%1.57%1.63%0.00%0.24%1.10%83.99%0.24%0.21%0.26%0.18%
CRK
Comstock Resources, Inc.
0.00%0.00%5.65%0.91%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%7.34%

Drawdowns

EQT vs. CRK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EQT drawdown since its inception was -91.50%, smaller than the maximum CRK drawdown of -99.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQT and CRK.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

EQT vs. CRK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for EQT Corporation (EQT) is 7.82%, while Comstock Resources, Inc. (CRK) has a volatility of 11.80%. This indicates that EQT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

EQT vs. CRK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between EQT Corporation and Comstock Resources, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B20212022202320242025
2.42B
512.85M
(EQT) Total Revenue
(CRK) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

EQT vs. CRK - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between EQT Corporation and Comstock Resources, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-50.0%0.0%50.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
70.7%
91.0%
(EQT) Gross Margin
(CRK) Gross Margin
EQT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, EQT Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.71B and revenue of 2.42B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 70.7%.

CRK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Comstock Resources, Inc. reported a gross profit of 466.68M and revenue of 512.85M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 91.0%.

EQT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, EQT Corporation reported an operating income of 496.25M and revenue of 2.42B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.5%.

CRK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Comstock Resources, Inc. reported an operating income of 126.17M and revenue of 512.85M, resulting in an operating margin of 24.6%.

EQT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, EQT Corporation reported a net income of 242.14M and revenue of 2.42B, resulting in a net margin of 10.0%.

CRK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Comstock Resources, Inc. reported a net income of -121.28M and revenue of 512.85M, resulting in a net margin of -23.7%.