EQT vs. ET
Compare and contrast key facts about EQT Corporation (EQT) and Energy Transfer LP (ET).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EQT or ET.
Correlation
The correlation between EQT and ET is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
EQT vs. ET - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
EQT:
0.84
ET:
0.54
EQT:
1.27
ET:
0.88
EQT:
1.17
ET:
1.12
EQT:
0.68
ET:
0.58
EQT:
2.75
ET:
2.03
EQT:
11.44%
ET:
6.99%
EQT:
37.39%
ET:
26.14%
EQT:
-91.57%
ET:
-87.81%
EQT:
-7.00%
ET:
-19.64%
Fundamentals
EQT:
$30.15B
ET:
$57.20B
EQT:
$0.61
ET:
$1.28
EQT:
82.56
ET:
13.02
EQT:
0.50
ET:
0.73
EQT:
4.90
ET:
0.69
EQT:
1.43
ET:
1.62
EQT:
$6.34B
ET:
$61.04B
EQT:
$3.11B
ET:
$10.60B
EQT:
$3.35B
ET:
$11.63B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EQT achieves a 12.79% return, which is significantly higher than ET's -13.53% return. Over the past 10 years, EQT has outperformed ET with an annualized return of 1.50%, while ET has yielded a comparatively lower 1.19% annualized return.
EQT
12.79%
12.45%
46.63%
30.88%
30.88%
1.50%
ET
-13.53%
3.16%
5.05%
13.01%
26.15%
1.19%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EQT vs. ET — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
EQT
ET
EQT vs. ET - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EQT Corporation (EQT) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
EQT vs. ET - Dividend Comparison
EQT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, less than ET's 7.71% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQT EQT Corporation | 1.23% | 1.39% | 1.58% | 1.66% | 0.00% | 0.24% | 1.10% | 83.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ET Energy Transfer LP | 7.71% | 6.51% | 8.96% | 7.33% | 7.44% | 17.28% | 9.51% | 9.24% | 6.66% | 5.90% | 7.42% | 2.61% |
Drawdowns
EQT vs. ET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EQT drawdown since its inception was -91.57%, roughly equal to the maximum ET drawdown of -87.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQT and ET. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
EQT vs. ET - Volatility Comparison
EQT Corporation (EQT) has a higher volatility of 18.07% compared to Energy Transfer LP (ET) at 16.44%. This indicates that EQT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
EQT vs. ET - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between EQT Corporation and Energy Transfer LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities