CNA vs. LVHD

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

CNA (CNA Financial Corporation) is a stock, while LVHD (Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF) is Dividend fund tracking the Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index. Over the past 10 years, CNA returned 12.73%/yr vs 8.56%/yr for LVHD. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

CNA vs. LVHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CNA Financial Corporation (CNA) and Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CNA achieves a 4.61% return, which is significantly lower than LVHD's 11.74% return. Over the past 10 years, CNA has outperformed LVHD with an annualized return of 12.73%, while LVHD has yielded a comparatively lower 8.56% annualized return.

CNA

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 7.34%
• YTD: 4.61%
• 6M: 4.30%
• 1Y: 12.16%
• 3Y*: 15.20%
• 5Y*: 8.33%
• 10Y*: 12.73%

LVHD

• 1D: 0.50%
• 1M: 2.68%
• YTD: 11.74%
• 6M: 11.10%
• 1Y: 16.26%
• 3Y*: 10.82%
• 5Y*: 7.53%
• 10Y*: 8.56%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CNA vs. LVHD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CNA CNA Financial Corporation	4.61%	6.96%	23.96%	7.14%	3.82%	19.07%	-5.42%	9.47%	-11.12%	36.94%
LVHD Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF	11.74%	7.50%	10.18%	-0.95%	-1.82%	26.90%	-1.28%	22.91%	-5.58%	14.25%

Correlation

The correlation between CNA and LVHD is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.51
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.51
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.56
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.56
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 29, 2015	0.56

The correlation between CNA and LVHD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CNA vs. LVHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CNA

CNA Risk / Return Rank: 60
CNA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
CNA Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
CNA Omega Ratio Rank: 55
CNA Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
CNA Martin Ratio Rank: 62

LVHD

LVHD Risk / Return Rank: 55
LVHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
LVHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
LVHD Omega Ratio Rank: 52
LVHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
LVHD Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CNA vs. LVHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CNA Financial Corporation (CNA) and Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CNA	LVHD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.62	1.66	-1.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.95	2.44	-1.48
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	1.29	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.84	2.65	-1.81
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.88	6.59	-4.70

CNA vs. LVHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CNA Sharpe Ratio is 0.62, which is lower than the LVHD Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CNA and LVHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CNA vs. LVHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNA drawdown since its inception was -87.48%, which is greater than LVHD's maximum drawdown of -37.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNA and LVHD.

Drawdown Indicators

	CNA	LVHD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-87.48%	-37.32%	-50.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.55%	-6.17%	-8.38%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.55%	-14.29%	-0.26%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.67%	-16.75%	-8.92%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.91%	-37.32%	-8.59%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.27%	-0.37%	-3.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.52%	-4.03%	-21.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.47%	2.48%	+3.99%

Volatility

CNA vs. LVHD - Volatility Comparison

CNA Financial Corporation (CNA) has a higher volatility of 6.83% compared to Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHD) at 4.00%. This indicates that CNA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LVHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CNA	LVHD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.83%	4.00%	+2.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.48%	7.24%	+8.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.91%	9.96%	+9.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.47%	12.92%	+8.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.94%	15.53%	+9.41%

Dividends

CNA vs. LVHD - Dividend Comparison

CNA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.27%, more than LVHD's 3.25% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CNA CNA Financial Corporation	8.27%	8.04%	7.77%	6.81%	8.51%	5.15%	8.93%	7.59%	7.47%	5.84%	7.23%	8.53%
LVHD Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF	3.25%	3.35%	4.23%	3.55%	3.30%	2.56%	3.27%	3.30%	3.82%	3.33%	2.48%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CNA and LVHD in my portfolio?

CNA and LVHD have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CNA or LVHD?

CNA has higher volatility (6.83%) compared to LVHD (4.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CNA dropped -87.48% vs LVHD's -37.32%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LVHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.