CNA vs. XLF
Compare and contrast key facts about CNA Financial Corporation (CNA) and Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF).
XLF is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Financial Select Sector Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 1998.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CNA or XLF.
Key characteristics
| CNA | XLF | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 17.49% | 33.79% |
| 1Y Return | 27.17% | 49.31% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 5.95% | 9.45% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 5.46% | 13.15% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 8.07% | 11.95% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.41 | 3.54 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.00 | 4.96 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.26 | 1.65 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.76 | 3.19 |
| Martin Ratio | 6.55 | 25.45 |
| Ulcer Index | 4.21% | 1.93% |
| Daily Std Dev | 19.51% | 13.86% |
| Max Drawdown | -87.19% | -82.69% |
| Current Drawdown | -6.97% | -0.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between CNA and XLF is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
CNA vs. XLF - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, CNA achieves a 17.49% return, which is significantly lower than XLF's 33.79% return. Over the past 10 years, CNA has underperformed XLF with an annualized return of 8.07%, while XLF has yielded a comparatively higher 11.95% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CNA vs. XLF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CNA Financial Corporation (CNA) and Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CNA vs. XLF - Dividend Comparison
CNA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.73%, more than XLF's 1.34% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNA CNA Financial Corporation | 2.73% | 3.97% | 3.78% | 3.45% | 3.80% | 7.59% | 7.47% | 5.84% | 7.23% | 8.53% | 5.17% | 1.87% |
XLF Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund | 1.34% | 1.71% | 2.04% | 1.63% | 2.03% | 1.86% | 2.09% | 1.48% | 1.63% | 1.95% | 1.61% | 1.47% |
Drawdowns
CNA vs. XLF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNA drawdown since its inception was -87.19%, which is greater than XLF's maximum drawdown of -82.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNA and XLF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CNA vs. XLF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CNA Financial Corporation (CNA) is 6.23%, while Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF) has a volatility of 7.08%. This indicates that CNA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.