PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CNA vs. XLF
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


CNAXLF
YTD Return7.43%12.60%
1Y Return17.81%34.75%
3Y Return (Ann)1.74%5.62%
5Y Return (Ann)3.39%11.71%
10Y Return (Ann)7.01%13.71%
Sharpe Ratio0.872.73
Daily Std Dev20.45%12.28%
Max Drawdown-87.19%-82.43%
Current Drawdown-3.66%0.00%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.6

The correlation between CNA and XLF is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

CNA vs. XLF - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CNA achieves a 7.43% return, which is significantly lower than XLF's 12.60% return. Over the past 10 years, CNA has underperformed XLF with an annualized return of 7.01%, while XLF has yielded a comparatively higher 13.71% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


100.00%150.00%200.00%250.00%300.00%350.00%400.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
138.18%
389.86%
CNA
XLF

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CNA Financial Corporation

Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CNA vs. XLF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CNA Financial Corporation (CNA) and Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CNA
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CNA, currently valued at 0.87, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.87
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CNA, currently valued at 1.44, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.44
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CNA, currently valued at 1.17, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.17
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CNA, currently valued at 0.80, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.80
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CNA, currently valued at 3.46, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.003.46
XLF
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for XLF, currently valued at 2.66, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.002.66
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for XLF, currently valued at 3.67, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.003.67
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for XLF, currently valued at 1.46, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.46
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for XLF, currently valued at 1.50, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.50
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for XLF, currently valued at 9.82, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.009.82

CNA vs. XLF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CNA Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is lower than the XLF Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of CNA and XLF.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.502.002.503.00December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.87
2.66
CNA
XLF

Dividends

CNA vs. XLF - Dividend Comparison

CNA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.82%, more than XLF's 1.52% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
CNA
CNA Financial Corporation
3.82%3.97%3.78%3.45%3.80%7.59%7.47%5.84%7.23%8.53%5.17%1.87%
XLF
Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund
1.52%1.71%2.04%1.63%2.03%1.87%2.08%1.48%1.63%2.40%1.98%1.81%

Drawdowns

CNA vs. XLF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNA drawdown since its inception was -87.19%, which is greater than XLF's maximum drawdown of -82.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNA and XLF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-3.66%
0
CNA
XLF

Volatility

CNA vs. XLF - Volatility Comparison

CNA Financial Corporation (CNA) has a higher volatility of 4.18% compared to Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF) at 2.75%. This indicates that CNA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
4.18%
2.75%
CNA
XLF