PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CNA vs. BRK-B
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

CNA vs. BRK-B - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CNA Financial Corporation (CNA) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CNA vs. BRK-B - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CNA
CNA Financial Corporation
0.77%6.96%23.96%7.14%3.82%19.07%-5.42%9.47%-11.12%36.94%
BRK-B
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
-4.80%10.89%27.09%15.46%3.31%28.95%2.37%10.93%3.01%21.62%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CNA:

$12.45B

BRK-B:

$1.03T

EPS

CNA:

$4.05

BRK-B:

$31.03

PE Ratio

CNA:

11.28

BRK-B:

15.42

PEG Ratio

CNA:

0.56

BRK-B:

0.60

PS Ratio

CNA:

1.12

BRK-B:

2.78

PB Ratio

CNA:

1.07

BRK-B:

1.44

Total Revenue (TTM)

CNA:

$11.12B

BRK-B:

$371.37B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CNA:

$3.39B

BRK-B:

$116.89B

EBITDA (TTM)

CNA:

$1.49B

BRK-B:

$87.30B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CNA achieves a 0.77% return, which is significantly higher than BRK-B's -4.80% return. Over the past 10 years, CNA has underperformed BRK-B with an annualized return of 11.27%, while BRK-B has yielded a comparatively higher 12.78% annualized return.


CNA

1D
-0.44%
1M
-7.79%
YTD
0.77%
6M
5.70%
1Y
-2.66%
3Y*
14.33%
5Y*
7.95%
10Y*
11.27%

BRK-B

1D
-0.15%
1M
-0.35%
YTD
-4.80%
6M
-3.95%
1Y
-10.22%
3Y*
15.72%
5Y*
13.13%
10Y*
12.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CNA vs. BRK-B — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CNA
CNA Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
CNA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNA Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNA Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
CNA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNA Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

BRK-B
BRK-B Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
BRK-B Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRK-B Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRK-B Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
BRK-B Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRK-B Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CNA vs. BRK-B - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CNA Financial Corporation (CNA) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CNABRK-BDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.13

-0.56

+0.43

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.05

-0.65

+0.60

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

0.91

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.18

-0.68

+0.50

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.35

-1.16

+0.82

CNA vs. BRK-B - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CNA Sharpe Ratio is -0.13, which is higher than the BRK-B Sharpe Ratio of -0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CNA and BRK-B, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CNABRK-BDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.13

-0.56

+0.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

0.77

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

0.66

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

0.48

-0.32

Correlation

The correlation between CNA and BRK-B is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

CNA vs. BRK-B - Dividend Comparison

CNA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.44%, while BRK-B has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CNA
CNA Financial Corporation
8.44%8.04%7.77%6.81%8.51%5.15%8.93%7.59%7.47%5.84%7.23%8.53%
BRK-B
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

CNA vs. BRK-B - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNA drawdown since its inception was -87.48%, which is greater than BRK-B's maximum drawdown of -53.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNA and BRK-B.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CNABRK-BDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.48%

-53.86%

-33.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.91%

-14.95%

+1.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.67%

-26.58%

+0.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.91%

-29.57%

-16.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.79%

-11.36%

+3.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.63%

-11.07%

-14.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.13%

8.72%

-1.59%

Volatility

CNA vs. BRK-B - Volatility Comparison

CNA Financial Corporation (CNA) has a higher volatility of 4.59% compared to Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) at 4.33%. This indicates that CNA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BRK-B based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CNABRK-BDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.59%

4.33%

+0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.87%

11.14%

+0.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.14%

18.30%

+1.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.11%

17.20%

+3.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.79%

19.45%

+5.34%

Financials

CNA vs. BRK-B - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CNA Financial Corporation and Berkshire Hathaway Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B100.00B120.00B140.00BAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
167.00M
94.23B
(CNA) Total Revenue
(BRK-B) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CNA vs. BRK-B - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between CNA Financial Corporation and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober0
23.0%
Portfolio components
CNA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CNA Financial Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 167.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

BRK-B - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. reported a gross profit of 21.68B and revenue of 94.23B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.0%.

CNA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CNA Financial Corporation reported an operating income of 92.00M and revenue of 167.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 55.1%.

BRK-B - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. reported an operating income of 13.65B and revenue of 94.23B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.5%.

CNA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CNA Financial Corporation reported a net income of 128.00M and revenue of 167.00M, resulting in a net margin of 76.7%.

BRK-B - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. reported a net income of 19.20B and revenue of 94.23B, resulting in a net margin of 20.4%.