CNA vs. BRK-B
Compare and contrast key facts about CNA Financial Corporation (CNA) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CNA or BRK-B.
Key characteristics
CNA | BRK-B | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | 17.49% | 30.74% |
1Y Return | 27.17% | 33.22% |
3Y Return (Ann) | 5.95% | 17.77% |
5Y Return (Ann) | 5.46% | 16.33% |
10Y Return (Ann) | 8.07% | 12.38% |
Sharpe Ratio | 1.41 | 2.30 |
Sortino Ratio | 2.00 | 3.22 |
Omega Ratio | 1.26 | 1.41 |
Calmar Ratio | 1.76 | 4.35 |
Martin Ratio | 6.55 | 11.41 |
Ulcer Index | 4.21% | 2.89% |
Daily Std Dev | 19.51% | 14.38% |
Max Drawdown | -87.19% | -53.86% |
Current Drawdown | -6.97% | -2.57% |
Fundamentals
CNA | BRK-B | |
---|---|---|
Market Cap | $13.11B | $1.01T |
EPS | $4.78 | $49.47 |
PE Ratio | 10.11 | 9.43 |
PEG Ratio | 4.21 | 10.06 |
Total Revenue (TTM) | $14.02B | $315.76B |
Gross Profit (TTM) | $13.28B | $66.19B |
EBITDA (TTM) | $470.00M | $7.45B |
Correlation
The correlation between CNA and BRK-B is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
CNA vs. BRK-B - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, CNA achieves a 17.49% return, which is significantly lower than BRK-B's 30.74% return. Over the past 10 years, CNA has underperformed BRK-B with an annualized return of 8.07%, while BRK-B has yielded a comparatively higher 12.38% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CNA vs. BRK-B - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CNA Financial Corporation (CNA) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CNA vs. BRK-B - Dividend Comparison
CNA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.73%, while BRK-B has not paid dividends to shareholders.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNA Financial Corporation | 2.73% | 3.97% | 3.78% | 3.45% | 3.80% | 7.59% | 7.47% | 5.84% | 7.23% | 8.53% | 5.17% | 1.87% |
Berkshire Hathaway Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CNA vs. BRK-B - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNA drawdown since its inception was -87.19%, which is greater than BRK-B's maximum drawdown of -53.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNA and BRK-B. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CNA vs. BRK-B - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CNA Financial Corporation (CNA) is 6.23%, while Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) has a volatility of 6.64%. This indicates that CNA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BRK-B based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
CNA vs. BRK-B - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CNA Financial Corporation and Berkshire Hathaway Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities