PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CNA vs. BRK-B
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


CNABRK-B
YTD Return17.49%30.74%
1Y Return27.17%33.22%
3Y Return (Ann)5.95%17.77%
5Y Return (Ann)5.46%16.33%
10Y Return (Ann)8.07%12.38%
Sharpe Ratio1.412.30
Sortino Ratio2.003.22
Omega Ratio1.261.41
Calmar Ratio1.764.35
Martin Ratio6.5511.41
Ulcer Index4.21%2.89%
Daily Std Dev19.51%14.38%
Max Drawdown-87.19%-53.86%
Current Drawdown-6.97%-2.57%

Fundamentals


CNABRK-B
Market Cap$13.11B$1.01T
EPS$4.78$49.47
PE Ratio10.119.43
PEG Ratio4.2110.06
Total Revenue (TTM)$14.02B$315.76B
Gross Profit (TTM)$13.28B$66.19B
EBITDA (TTM)$470.00M$7.45B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between CNA and BRK-B is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

CNA vs. BRK-B - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CNA achieves a 17.49% return, which is significantly lower than BRK-B's 30.74% return. Over the past 10 years, CNA has underperformed BRK-B with an annualized return of 8.07%, while BRK-B has yielded a comparatively higher 12.38% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
10.32%
13.66%
CNA
BRK-B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CNA vs. BRK-B - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CNA Financial Corporation (CNA) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CNA
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CNA, currently valued at 1.41, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.41
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CNA, currently valued at 2.00, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.00
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CNA, currently valued at 1.26, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.26
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CNA, currently valued at 1.76, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.76
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CNA, currently valued at 6.55, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.006.55
BRK-B
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BRK-B, currently valued at 2.30, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.30
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for BRK-B, currently valued at 3.22, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.003.22
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for BRK-B, currently valued at 1.41, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.41
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for BRK-B, currently valued at 4.35, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.004.35
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for BRK-B, currently valued at 11.41, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0011.41

CNA vs. BRK-B - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CNA Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is lower than the BRK-B Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CNA and BRK-B, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.41
2.30
CNA
BRK-B

Dividends

CNA vs. BRK-B - Dividend Comparison

CNA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.73%, while BRK-B has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
CNA
CNA Financial Corporation
2.73%3.97%3.78%3.45%3.80%7.59%7.47%5.84%7.23%8.53%5.17%1.87%
BRK-B
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

CNA vs. BRK-B - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNA drawdown since its inception was -87.19%, which is greater than BRK-B's maximum drawdown of -53.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNA and BRK-B. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-6.97%
-2.57%
CNA
BRK-B

Volatility

CNA vs. BRK-B - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CNA Financial Corporation (CNA) is 6.23%, while Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) has a volatility of 6.64%. This indicates that CNA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BRK-B based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
6.23%
6.64%
CNA
BRK-B

Financials

CNA vs. BRK-B - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CNA Financial Corporation and Berkshire Hathaway Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items