PortfoliosLab logo
CNA vs. BRK-B
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CNA and BRK-B is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

CNA vs. BRK-B - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CNA Financial Corporation (CNA) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%500.00%1,000.00%1,500.00%2,000.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
213.29%
2,112.28%
CNA
BRK-B

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CNA:

0.57

BRK-B:

1.34

Sortino Ratio

CNA:

0.91

BRK-B:

1.89

Omega Ratio

CNA:

1.12

BRK-B:

1.28

Calmar Ratio

CNA:

1.10

BRK-B:

3.04

Martin Ratio

CNA:

2.68

BRK-B:

7.70

Ulcer Index

CNA:

4.75%

BRK-B:

3.48%

Daily Std Dev

CNA:

21.57%

BRK-B:

19.71%

Max Drawdown

CNA:

-87.19%

BRK-B:

-53.86%

Current Drawdown

CNA:

-5.16%

BRK-B:

-4.92%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CNA:

$12.85B

BRK-B:

$1.11T

EPS

CNA:

$3.52

BRK-B:

$37.54

PE Ratio

CNA:

13.66

BRK-B:

13.64

PEG Ratio

CNA:

4.21

BRK-B:

10.06

PS Ratio

CNA:

0.92

BRK-B:

2.98

PB Ratio

CNA:

1.24

BRK-B:

1.79

Total Revenue (TTM)

CNA:

$14.38B

BRK-B:

$401.70B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CNA:

$13.64B

BRK-B:

$317.24B

EBITDA (TTM)

CNA:

$933.00M

BRK-B:

$105.57B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CNA achieves a 0.94% return, which is significantly lower than BRK-B's 13.23% return. Over the past 10 years, CNA has underperformed BRK-B with an annualized return of 7.57%, while BRK-B has yielded a comparatively higher 13.42% annualized return.


CNA

YTD

0.94%

1M

5.94%

6M

1.13%

1Y

12.11%

5Y*

14.84%

10Y*

7.57%

BRK-B

YTD

13.23%

1M

4.18%

6M

11.54%

1Y

26.30%

5Y*

23.84%

10Y*

13.42%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CNA vs. BRK-B — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CNA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CNA is 7272
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CNA is 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CNA is 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CNA is 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CNA is 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CNA is 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

BRK-B
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BRK-B is 9090
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BRK-B is 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BRK-B is 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BRK-B is 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BRK-B is 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BRK-B is 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CNA vs. BRK-B - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CNA Financial Corporation (CNA) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CNA Sharpe Ratio is 0.57, which is lower than the BRK-B Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CNA and BRK-B, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.57
1.34
CNA
BRK-B

Dividends

CNA vs. BRK-B - Dividend Comparison

CNA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.68%, while BRK-B has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CNA
CNA Financial Corporation
3.68%3.64%3.97%3.78%3.45%3.80%7.59%7.47%5.84%7.23%8.53%5.17%
BRK-B
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

CNA vs. BRK-B - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNA drawdown since its inception was -87.19%, which is greater than BRK-B's maximum drawdown of -53.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNA and BRK-B. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-5.16%
-4.92%
CNA
BRK-B

Volatility

CNA vs. BRK-B - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CNA Financial Corporation (CNA) is 7.81%, while Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) has a volatility of 9.70%. This indicates that CNA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BRK-B based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
7.81%
9.70%
CNA
BRK-B

Financials

CNA vs. BRK-B - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CNA Financial Corporation and Berkshire Hathaway Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00B100.00B150.00B20212022202320242025
3.63B
89.73B
(CNA) Total Revenue
(BRK-B) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items