PortfoliosLab logo
CNA vs. PGR
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CNA and PGR is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

CNA vs. PGR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CNA Financial Corporation (CNA) and The Progressive Corporation (PGR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%10,000.00%20,000.00%30,000.00%40,000.00%50,000.00%60,000.00%70,000.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
403.09%
67,275.42%
CNA
PGR

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CNA:

0.57

PGR:

1.40

Sortino Ratio

CNA:

0.91

PGR:

1.90

Omega Ratio

CNA:

1.12

PGR:

1.27

Calmar Ratio

CNA:

1.10

PGR:

2.80

Martin Ratio

CNA:

2.68

PGR:

6.98

Ulcer Index

CNA:

4.75%

PGR:

4.94%

Daily Std Dev

CNA:

21.57%

PGR:

24.64%

Max Drawdown

CNA:

-87.19%

PGR:

-71.05%

Current Drawdown

CNA:

-5.16%

PGR:

-2.47%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CNA:

$12.85B

PGR:

$165.41B

EPS

CNA:

$3.52

PGR:

$14.82

PE Ratio

CNA:

13.66

PGR:

19.04

PEG Ratio

CNA:

4.21

PGR:

7.31

PS Ratio

CNA:

0.92

PGR:

2.10

PB Ratio

CNA:

1.24

PGR:

5.59

Total Revenue (TTM)

CNA:

$14.38B

PGR:

$78.52B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CNA:

$13.64B

PGR:

$58.11B

EBITDA (TTM)

CNA:

$933.00M

PGR:

$8.20B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CNA achieves a 0.94% return, which is significantly lower than PGR's 20.90% return. Over the past 10 years, CNA has underperformed PGR with an annualized return of 7.57%, while PGR has yielded a comparatively higher 29.70% annualized return.


CNA

YTD

0.94%

1M

5.94%

6M

1.13%

1Y

12.11%

5Y*

14.84%

10Y*

7.57%

PGR

YTD

20.90%

1M

9.04%

6M

13.48%

1Y

34.29%

5Y*

33.54%

10Y*

29.70%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CNA vs. PGR — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CNA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CNA is 7272
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CNA is 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CNA is 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CNA is 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CNA is 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CNA is 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

PGR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PGR is 8989
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PGR is 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PGR is 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PGR is 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PGR is 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PGR is 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CNA vs. PGR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CNA Financial Corporation (CNA) and The Progressive Corporation (PGR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CNA Sharpe Ratio is 0.57, which is lower than the PGR Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CNA and PGR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.002.503.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.57
1.40
CNA
PGR

Dividends

CNA vs. PGR - Dividend Comparison

CNA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.68%, more than PGR's 1.73% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CNA
CNA Financial Corporation
3.68%3.64%3.97%3.78%3.45%3.80%7.59%7.47%5.84%7.23%8.53%5.17%
PGR
The Progressive Corporation
1.73%0.48%0.25%0.31%6.23%2.68%3.89%1.86%1.21%2.50%2.16%5.53%

Drawdowns

CNA vs. PGR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNA drawdown since its inception was -87.19%, which is greater than PGR's maximum drawdown of -71.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNA and PGR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-5.16%
-2.47%
CNA
PGR

Volatility

CNA vs. PGR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CNA Financial Corporation (CNA) is 7.81%, while The Progressive Corporation (PGR) has a volatility of 8.27%. This indicates that CNA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PGR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
7.81%
8.27%
CNA
PGR

Financials

CNA vs. PGR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CNA Financial Corporation and The Progressive Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B20212022202320242025
3.63B
20.41B
(CNA) Total Revenue
(PGR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items