PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CNA vs. MKL
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


CNAMKL
YTD Return17.49%16.52%
1Y Return27.17%22.21%
3Y Return (Ann)5.95%8.69%
5Y Return (Ann)5.46%7.95%
10Y Return (Ann)8.07%9.00%
Sharpe Ratio1.411.20
Sortino Ratio2.001.70
Omega Ratio1.261.24
Calmar Ratio1.761.91
Martin Ratio6.555.30
Ulcer Index4.21%4.44%
Daily Std Dev19.51%19.60%
Max Drawdown-87.19%-61.32%
Current Drawdown-6.97%-0.52%

Fundamentals


CNAMKL
Market Cap$13.11B$21.28B
EPS$4.78$216.70
PE Ratio10.117.64
PEG Ratio4.217.05
Total Revenue (TTM)$14.02B$17.31B
Gross Profit (TTM)$13.28B$17.91B
EBITDA (TTM)$470.00M$1.24B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between CNA and MKL is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

CNA vs. MKL - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CNA achieves a 17.49% return, which is significantly higher than MKL's 16.52% return. Over the past 10 years, CNA has underperformed MKL with an annualized return of 8.07%, while MKL has yielded a comparatively higher 9.00% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
10.32%
0.57%
CNA
MKL

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CNA vs. MKL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CNA Financial Corporation (CNA) and Markel Corporation (MKL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CNA
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CNA, currently valued at 1.41, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.41
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CNA, currently valued at 2.00, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.00
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CNA, currently valued at 1.26, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.26
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CNA, currently valued at 1.76, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.76
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CNA, currently valued at 6.55, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.006.55
MKL
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MKL, currently valued at 1.20, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.20
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for MKL, currently valued at 1.70, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.70
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for MKL, currently valued at 1.24, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.24
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for MKL, currently valued at 1.91, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.91
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for MKL, currently valued at 5.30, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.005.30

CNA vs. MKL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CNA Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is comparable to the MKL Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CNA and MKL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.41
1.20
CNA
MKL

Dividends

CNA vs. MKL - Dividend Comparison

CNA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.73%, while MKL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
CNA
CNA Financial Corporation
2.73%3.97%3.78%3.45%3.80%7.59%7.47%5.84%7.23%8.53%5.17%1.87%
MKL
Markel Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

CNA vs. MKL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNA drawdown since its inception was -87.19%, which is greater than MKL's maximum drawdown of -61.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNA and MKL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-6.97%
-0.52%
CNA
MKL

Volatility

CNA vs. MKL - Volatility Comparison

CNA Financial Corporation (CNA) and Markel Corporation (MKL) have volatilities of 6.23% and 6.43%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
6.23%
6.43%
CNA
MKL

Financials

CNA vs. MKL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CNA Financial Corporation and Markel Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items